Note: Ballotpedia will be read-only from 9pm CST on February 25-March 2 while Judgepedia is merged into Ballotpedia.
For status updates, visit

Difference between revisions of "Washington Term Limits, Initiative 573 (1992)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Path to the ballot)
Line 38: Line 38:
*[[1991 ballot measures]]
*[[1991 ballot measures]]
*[[List of Washington ballot measures]]
*[[List of Washington ballot measures]]
*[[List of ballot measures by year]]
*[[List of ballot measures by state]]
==External links==
==External links==

Revision as of 08:54, 23 September 2013

Voting on
Term Limits
Term limits.jpg
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot

State legislative
term limits

term limits
Lieutenant Governors
term limits
Secretaries of State
term limits
Attorneys General
term limits
State executive
term limits
Ballot measures
in Washington State
Seal of Washington.jpg
Constitutional amendments
Initiatives to the People
Initiatives to the Legislature
Statutes referred by Legislature
Veto referendums
Political topics on the ballot

The Washington Term Limits Initiative, also known as Initiative 573, was on the November 3, 1992 ballot in Washington as an Initiative to the People, where it was approved. The measure limited the term lengths for certain political offices.[1]

Election results

Washington Initiative 573 (1992)
Approveda Yes 1,119,985 52.38%

Election results via: Washington Secretary of State

Text of measure

The language that appeared on the ballot:[1]

Shall candidates for certain offices, who have already served for specified time periods in those offices, be denied ballot access?[2]

Path to the ballot

206,685 signatures were filed to qualify the measure for the ballot to be sent to the legislature. When the legislature did not take action on the proposed legislation, the measure was placed on the ballot as provided by the state constitution.[3]

Signatures collection controversy

The majority of the initiative’s signatures were collected by workers who were paid forty cents per signature. Sponsor Bockwinkel defended the method as being “the most cost-effective way to gather signatures.” The campaign was criticized by outside groups, but the pay-per-signature method is not illegal in the state of Washington.[4]

See also

Suggest a link

External links