Difference between revisions of "Weston Village Bus Service Question (June 2012)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with 'A '''Weston Village Bus Service Question''' will be on the June 5, 2012 ballot in the village of Weston which is in [[Marathon Count…')
 
m (Additional reading)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
==Additional reading==
 
==Additional reading==
 +
* [http://centralwisconsinhub.wausaudailyherald.com/article/20120502/WDH06/205020330/Our-View-On-transit-Weston-sees-input-as-nuisance?odyssey=tab%7Cmostpopular%7Ctext%7CFRONTPAGE Our View: On transit, Weston sees input as nuisance]
 
* [http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/article/20120423/WDH0101/120423065/Judge-orders-Weston-bus-referendum-June-5-ballot- ''Wausau Daily Herald'', "Judge orders Weston bus referendum on June 5 ballot," April 23, 2012]
 
* [http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/article/20120423/WDH0101/120423065/Judge-orders-Weston-bus-referendum-June-5-ballot- ''Wausau Daily Herald'', "Judge orders Weston bus referendum on June 5 ballot," April 23, 2012]
 
* [http://wsau.com/news/articles/2011/nov/02/weston-bus-service-petitions-ratified/ ''WSAU News'', "Weston bus service petitions ratified," November 2, 2011]
 
* [http://wsau.com/news/articles/2011/nov/02/weston-bus-service-petitions-ratified/ ''WSAU News'', "Weston bus service petitions ratified," November 2, 2011]

Revision as of 13:03, 2 May 2012

A Weston Village Bus Service Question will be on the June 5, 2012 ballot in the village of Weston which is in Marathon County.

This measure seeks to implement bus services in the village for at least five days a week starting in 2013. A judge ordered this measure on to the ballot after the village officials would not validate a citizen led petition to re institute services. As a way to cut expenditures in the village, officials cut bus service as a result of low customer usage of the buses. A group then started a petition to start the services back up but even though there were enough valid signatures officials ruled that a referendum on canceling their contract with bus service providers was not valid. The group who initiated the petition then took the issue to court, in which the judge made the ruling that the petition was valid and the issue must be put to a vote. The June date was chosen for the measure as the judge ruled that the village was allowed at least six weeks to prepare for the vote.[1]

Additional reading

References