Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




Difference between revisions of "Weston Village Bus Service Question (June 2012)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m (Text replace - "ategory:City ordinance,(.*)]]" to "ategory:City governance,$1]]")
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''Weston Village Bus Service Question''' will be on the [[June 5, 2012 ballot measures in Wisconsin|June 5, 2012]] ballot in the village of Weston, which is in [[Marathon County, Wisconsin ballot measures|Marathon County]].
+
{{tnr}}A '''Weston Village Bus Service Question''' was on the [[June 5, 2012 ballot measures in Wisconsin|June 5, 2012]] ballot in the village of Weston, which is in [[Marathon County, Wisconsin ballot measures|Marathon County]].
  
This measure seeks to implement bus services in the village for at least five days a week starting in 2013. A judge ordered this measure on to the ballot after village officials would not validate a petition to re initialize bus services in the village. As a way to cut expenditures in the village, officials cut bus service as a result of low customer usage of the buses. A group then started a petition to restart the services. Even though there were enough valid signatures, village officials ruled that a referendum on canceling their contract with bus service providers was not valid. The group who initiated the petition then took the issue to court, where the judge ruled that the petition was valid and the issue must be put to a vote. The June date was chosen for the measure as the judge ruled that the village was allowed at least six weeks to prepare for the vote.<ref>[http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/article/20120317/WDH0101/203170471/Judge-Put-bus-question-voters-Weston ''Wausau Daily Herald'', "Judge: Put bus question to voters in Weston," March 17, 2012]</ref>
+
This measure sought to implement bus services in the village for at least five days a week starting in 2013. A judge ordered this measure on to the ballot after village officials would not validate a petition to resume bus services in the village. As a way to cut expenditures in the village, officials had cut bus service as a result of low customer usage of the buses. A group then started a petition to restart the services. Even though there were enough valid signatures, village officials ruled that a referendum on canceling their contract with bus service providers was not valid. The group who initiated the petition then took the issue to court, where the judge ruled that the petition was valid and the issue must be put to a vote. The June date was chosen for the measure as the judge ruled that the village was allowed at least six weeks to prepare for the vote.<ref>[http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/article/20120317/WDH0101/203170471/Judge-Put-bus-question-voters-Weston ''Wausau Daily Herald'', "Judge: Put bus question to voters in Weston," March 17, 2012]</ref>
  
The first draft of the wording for the referendum was struck down by a state order because it contained a fiscal note, which was not necessary. The order noted that the fiscal statement is not authorized under Wisconsin law. The fiscal note gave an estimate of how much the bus services would cost the village if they are reinstated. The village then had to confer with an attorney to ensure that the right language was submitted and printed on the ballots. Officials noted that this measure will likely be appealed if it does get approved.<ref>[http://wsau.com/news/articles/2012/may/15/weston-bus-referendum-fiscal-note-struck-down/ ''WSAU News Talk'', "Weston bus referendum fiscal note struck down," May 15, 2012]</ref>
+
==Election results==
 +
This measure was '''approved'''.
 +
{{Short outcome
 +
| title = Weston Village Bus Service Question
 +
| yes = 3,605
 +
| yespct = 63.74
 +
| no = 2,051
 +
| nopct = 36.26
 +
| image = {{approved}}
 +
}}<ref>[http://www.co.marathon.wi.us/Departments/CountyClerk/Elections/Results.aspx ''Marathon County Clerk'', Current Election Results]</ref>
  
The village had also filed a motion with the judge who ruled on the measure to stop or stay his order of putting this measure to vote in June. The attorneys for the village had continued to stress their point of view that in their opinion the measure as illegal, and that direct legislation cannot overturn the village's decision. A suggestion was to push the measure to November.<ref>[http://wsau.com/news/articles/2012/may/21/weston-wants-june-5th-bus-referendum-put-off/ ''WSAU News Talk'', "Weston wants June 5th bus referendum put off," May 21, 2012]</ref>
+
==Ballot issues==
 +
The first draft of the wording for the referendum was struck down by a state order because it contained a [[fiscal impact statement|fiscal note]], which was not necessary. The order noted that the fiscal statement is not authorized under Wisconsin law. The [[fiscal impact statement|fiscal note]] gave an estimate of how much the bus services would cost the village if the services were resumed. The village then had to confer with an attorney to ensure that the right language was submitted and printed on the ballots. Officials noted that this measure will likely be appealed if it does get approved.<ref>[http://wsau.com/news/articles/2012/may/15/weston-bus-referendum-fiscal-note-struck-down/ ''WSAU News Talk'', "Weston bus referendum [[fiscal impact statement|fiscal note]] struck down," May 15, 2012]</ref>
 +
 
 +
The village had also filed a motion with the judge who ruled on the measure to stop or stay his order of putting this measure to vote in June. The attorneys for the village had continued to stress their point of view that in their opinion the measure was illegal, and that direct legislation cannot overturn the village's decision. A suggestion was to push the measure to November.<ref>[http://wsau.com/news/articles/2012/may/21/weston-wants-june-5th-bus-referendum-put-off/ ''WSAU News Talk'', "Weston wants June 5th bus referendum put off," May 21, 2012]</ref>
  
 
==Additional reading==
 
==Additional reading==
* [http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/article/20120525/WDH06/205250387/Mentzer-column-How-Weston-thinks-about-transit-referendum?odyssey=mod%7Cnewswell%7Ctext%7CFRONTPAGE%7Cs ''Wausau Dail Herald'', "Robert Mentzer column: How Weston officials think about transit referendum," May 24, 2012]
+
* [http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/article/20120602/WDH06/206020353/Mark-Timken-column-Weston-residents-rely-transportation?odyssey=mod%7Cnewswell%7Ctext%7CFRONTPAGE%7Cs ''Wausau Daily Herald'', "Mark Timken column: Weston residents rely on transportation," June 1, 2012]
 +
* [http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/article/20120525/WDH06/205250387/Mentzer-column-How-Weston-thinks-about-transit-referendum?odyssey=mod%7Cnewswell%7Ctext%7CFRONTPAGE%7Cs ''Wausau Daily Herald'', "Robert Mentzer column: How Weston officials think about transit referendum," May 24, 2012]
 
* [http://centralwisconsinhub.wausaudailyherald.com/article/20120502/WDH06/205020330/Our-View-On-transit-Weston-sees-input-as-nuisance?odyssey=tab%7Cmostpopular%7Ctext%7CFRONTPAGE Our View: On transit, Weston sees input as nuisance]
 
* [http://centralwisconsinhub.wausaudailyherald.com/article/20120502/WDH06/205020330/Our-View-On-transit-Weston-sees-input-as-nuisance?odyssey=tab%7Cmostpopular%7Ctext%7CFRONTPAGE Our View: On transit, Weston sees input as nuisance]
 
* [http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/article/20120423/WDH0101/120423065/Judge-orders-Weston-bus-referendum-June-5-ballot- ''Wausau Daily Herald'', "Judge orders Weston bus referendum on June 5 ballot," April 23, 2012]
 
* [http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/article/20120423/WDH0101/120423065/Judge-orders-Weston-bus-referendum-June-5-ballot- ''Wausau Daily Herald'', "Judge orders Weston bus referendum on June 5 ballot," April 23, 2012]
Line 19: Line 32:
 
{{Wisconsin}}
 
{{Wisconsin}}
 
[[Category:Wisconsin 2012 local ballot measures]]
 
[[Category:Wisconsin 2012 local ballot measures]]
[[Category:City ordinance, Wisconsin, 2012]]
+
[[Category:City governance, Wisconsin, 2012]]

Latest revision as of 19:06, 22 September 2012

A Weston Village Bus Service Question was on the June 5, 2012 ballot in the village of Weston, which is in Marathon County.

This measure sought to implement bus services in the village for at least five days a week starting in 2013. A judge ordered this measure on to the ballot after village officials would not validate a petition to resume bus services in the village. As a way to cut expenditures in the village, officials had cut bus service as a result of low customer usage of the buses. A group then started a petition to restart the services. Even though there were enough valid signatures, village officials ruled that a referendum on canceling their contract with bus service providers was not valid. The group who initiated the petition then took the issue to court, where the judge ruled that the petition was valid and the issue must be put to a vote. The June date was chosen for the measure as the judge ruled that the village was allowed at least six weeks to prepare for the vote.[1]

Election results

This measure was approved.

Weston Village Bus Service Question
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 3,605 63.74%
No2,05136.26%
[2]

Ballot issues

The first draft of the wording for the referendum was struck down by a state order because it contained a fiscal note, which was not necessary. The order noted that the fiscal statement is not authorized under Wisconsin law. The fiscal note gave an estimate of how much the bus services would cost the village if the services were resumed. The village then had to confer with an attorney to ensure that the right language was submitted and printed on the ballots. Officials noted that this measure will likely be appealed if it does get approved.[3]

The village had also filed a motion with the judge who ruled on the measure to stop or stay his order of putting this measure to vote in June. The attorneys for the village had continued to stress their point of view that in their opinion the measure was illegal, and that direct legislation cannot overturn the village's decision. A suggestion was to push the measure to November.[4]

Additional reading

References