Difference between revisions of "Whitehall School District Bond Measure (May 2010)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
This measure seeks to create a bond in the amount of $11,760,000 in order to help with furnishing and equip various buildings in the school district as well as purchasing new buses.<ref>[https://treas-secure.state.mi.us/apps/findschoolbondelectinfo.asp?countyname=All&SelectYear=2010&electionresult=All&sortorder=ByElectionDate&Submit1=%A0Go%A0 ''Michigan State Treasure'' Qualified School Bond Elections]</ref> School officials have emphasized the need of this bond, a reduced bond from the failed measure voted on May, 2009. The school district had gone out to ask resident what they wanted and are hoping the scaled down version will be able to pass more easily with resident support behind it. Upgrades are noted to be greatly needed at many school buildings and officials are hoping that with support the schools will be able to upgrade as needed.<ref>[http://www.mlive.com/opinion/muskegon/index.ssf/2010/04/make_or_break_time_in_whitehal.html ''The Muskegon Chronicle'', "Make or break time in Whitehall;Failure in May 4 bond vote will be ‘devastating’," April 23, 2010]</ref>
 
This measure seeks to create a bond in the amount of $11,760,000 in order to help with furnishing and equip various buildings in the school district as well as purchasing new buses.<ref>[https://treas-secure.state.mi.us/apps/findschoolbondelectinfo.asp?countyname=All&SelectYear=2010&electionresult=All&sortorder=ByElectionDate&Submit1=%A0Go%A0 ''Michigan State Treasure'' Qualified School Bond Elections]</ref> School officials have emphasized the need of this bond, a reduced bond from the failed measure voted on May, 2009. The school district had gone out to ask resident what they wanted and are hoping the scaled down version will be able to pass more easily with resident support behind it. Upgrades are noted to be greatly needed at many school buildings and officials are hoping that with support the schools will be able to upgrade as needed.<ref>[http://www.mlive.com/opinion/muskegon/index.ssf/2010/04/make_or_break_time_in_whitehal.html ''The Muskegon Chronicle'', "Make or break time in Whitehall;Failure in May 4 bond vote will be ‘devastating’," April 23, 2010]</ref>
 +
 +
Opponents state that misuse of funds and stating that property taxes would not increase, when continuing them in fact keeps them raised, is strong reason to vote against this bond measure. They also note that asking for continued tax increases hurts residents more in the hard economic times.<ref>[http://www.mlive.com/opinion/muskegon/index.ssf/2010/04/letters_vote_no_on_whitehall_b_1.html ''Muskegon Chronicle'', "Letters: Vote 'No' on Whitehall bond issue," April 29, 2010]</ref>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 08:18, 29 April 2010

There will be a Whitehall School District Bond Measure on the May 4 ballot in Muskegon County for voters in the Whitehall school district.

This measure seeks to create a bond in the amount of $11,760,000 in order to help with furnishing and equip various buildings in the school district as well as purchasing new buses.[1] School officials have emphasized the need of this bond, a reduced bond from the failed measure voted on May, 2009. The school district had gone out to ask resident what they wanted and are hoping the scaled down version will be able to pass more easily with resident support behind it. Upgrades are noted to be greatly needed at many school buildings and officials are hoping that with support the schools will be able to upgrade as needed.[2]

Opponents state that misuse of funds and stating that property taxes would not increase, when continuing them in fact keeps them raised, is strong reason to vote against this bond measure. They also note that asking for continued tax increases hurts residents more in the hard economic times.[3]

References