Wisconsin Marriage Amendment, Question 1 (2006)
- The amendment created Section 13 of Article XIII of the Wisconsin Constitution to define marriage in the state as between one man and one woman.
|Wisconsin Question 1 (2006)|
Official results via: The Wisconsin Blue Book 2007-2008
Text of measure
The ballot question read:
|“||Marriage. Shall section 13 of article XIII of the constitution be created to provide that only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in this state and that a legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized in this state?" ||”|
Article XIII, §13
Under present Wisconsin law, only a marriage between a husband and a wife is recognized as valid in this state. A husband is commonly defined as a man who is married to a woman, and a wife is commonly defined as a woman who is married to a man.
A "yes" vote would make the existing restriction on marriage as a union between a man and a woman part of the state constitution, and would prohibit any recognition of the validity of a marriage between persons other than one man and one woman.
A "yes" vote would also prohibit recognition of any legal status which is identical or substantially similar to marriage for unmarried persons of either the same sex or different sexes. The constitution would not further specify what is, or what is not, a legal status identical or substantially similar to marriage. Whether any particular type of domestic relationship, partnership or agreement between unmarried persons would be prohibited by this amendment would be left to further legislative or judicial determination.
Donors to the campaign for the measure:
- Vote Yes for Marriage: $627,227
- Focus on Family Marriage Amedment: $35,134
- Highland Community Church: $2,697
- Marriage Amendment Committee: $2,140
- Marriage is 1 Man and 1 Woman: $1,584
- Marinette/Oconto Co Churches: $400
- WI Catholic Conf-AFFM Marriage: $69
- Total: $669,251
Donors to the campaign against the measure:
- Fair Wisconsin: $4,285,746
- Good For Wisconsin: $12,535
- ACLU of Wisconsin Against the Ban: $7,033
- Catholic Families Basic Rights:$3,950
- Attorneys Against the Ban: $1,849
- Wisconsin Coalition Against Sex Assault: $1,173
- Wisconsin Coalition Against Sex Assault: $916
- UW Oshkosh Coalition Against AMD: $292
- Total: $4,313,493
- Overall Total: $4,982,745
A variety of lawsuits have been filed in the wake of the victory of Question One.
- In 2009, Wisconsin Family Action and others who supported Question One filed a lawsuit against the State of Wisconsin to prevent it from implementing a domestic-partnership registry. According to Julaine Appling, president of Wisconsin Family Action, "Elected officials should never pass laws that violate the will of Wisconsin voters who legitimately amended the state constitution in a fair election. This new domestic-partnership scheme is a sneaky assault on marriage from those who are determined to redefine marriage in Wisconsin." This lawsuit was brought directly to the state Supreme Court and was dismissed in November 2009.
- In August 2010, Wisconsin Family Action and others filed a lawsuit in Dane County Circuit Court on the same basis.
Path to the ballot
First approval: 2003 AJR 66 (JR 29) Second approval: 2005 SJR 53 (JR 30)
- Wisconsin ballot measures
- Wisconsin 2006 ballot measures
- 2006 ballot measures
- Wisconsin State Senate
- Wisconsin State Assembly
- Kenosha County Clerk, "Sample Ballot", November 7, 2006 - General Election
- Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.
- The Wisconsin Blue Book 2007-2008, p.887
- Follow the Money, "Donors"
- Advocate, "Antigay Groups Sue Over Wisconsin DPs", July 24, 2009
- AP/Wisconsin State Journal, "Lawsuit challenges Wisconsin's domestic partner registry",August 18, 2010
State of Wisconsin
|State executive officers||
Governor | Lieutenant Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Treasurer | State Auditor | Superintendent of Public Instruction | Commissioner of Insurance | Secretary of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection| Secretary of Natural Resources | Secretary of Workforce Development | Public Service Commission |