Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




Wisconsin Marriage Amendment, Question 1 (2006)

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 23:00, 24 July 2013 by JWilliams (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
Voting on
Marriage and Family
Wedding rings.jpg
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot
Wisconsin Constitution
Flag of Wisconsin.png
Preamble
Articles
IIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIIIIXXXIXIIXIIIXIV

The Wisconsin Marriage Amendment, also known as Question 1, was a legislatively-referred constitutional amendment on the November 7, 2006 general election ballot in Wisconsin, where it was approved. The amendment created Section 13 of Article XIII of the Wisconsin Constitution to define marriage in the state as between one man and one woman.

Election results

Wisconsin Question 1 (2006)
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 1,264,310 59.4%
No862,92440.6%

Official results via: The Wisconsin Blue Book 2007-2008

Text of measure

The ballot question read:

This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.

Marriage. Shall section 13 of article XIII of the constitution be created to provide that only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in this state and that a legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized in this state?" [1]

Constitutional changes

Article XIII, §13
Marriage. Section 13. Only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in this state. A legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized in this state.[2]

Official summary

Under present Wisconsin law, only a marriage between a husband and a wife is recognized as valid in this state. A husband is commonly defined as a man who is married to a woman, and a wife is commonly defined as a woman who is married to a man.

A "yes" vote would make the existing restriction on marriage as a union between a man and a woman part of the state constitution, and would prohibit any recognition of the validity of a marriage between persons other than one man and one woman.

A "yes" vote would also prohibit recognition of any legal status which is identical or substantially similar to marriage for unmarried persons of either the same sex or different sexes. The constitution would not further specify what is, or what is not, a legal status identical or substantially similar to marriage. Whether any particular type of domestic relationship, partnership or agreement between unmarried persons would be prohibited by this amendment would be left to further legislative or judicial determination.

Campaign contribitions

Donors to the campaign for the measure:[3]

  • Vote Yes for Marriage: $627,227
  • Focus on Family Marriage Amedment: $35,134
  • Highland Community Church: $2,697
  • Marriage Amendment Committee: $2,140
  • Marriage is 1 Man and 1 Woman: $1,584
  • Marinette/Oconto Co Churches: $400
  • WI Catholic Conf-AFFM Marriage: $69
  • Total: $669,251

Donors to the campaign against the measure:

  • Fair Wisconsin: $4,285,746
  • Good For Wisconsin: $12,535
  • ACLU of Wisconsin Against the Ban: $7,033
  • Catholic Families Basic Rights:$3,950
  • Attorneys Against the Ban: $1,849
  • Wisconsin Coalition Against Sex Assault: $1,173
  • Wisconsin Coalition Against Sex Assault: $916
  • UW Oshkosh Coalition Against AMD: $292
  • Total: $4,313,493
  • Overall Total: $4,982,745

Lawsuits

A variety of lawsuits have been filed in the wake of the victory of Question One.

  • In 2009, Wisconsin Family Action and others who supported Question One filed a lawsuit against the State of Wisconsin to prevent it from implementing a domestic-partnership registry.[4] According to Julaine Appling, president of Wisconsin Family Action, "Elected officials should never pass laws that violate the will of Wisconsin voters who legitimately amended the state constitution in a fair election. This new domestic-partnership scheme is a sneaky assault on marriage from those who are determined to redefine marriage in Wisconsin."[4] This lawsuit was brought directly to the state Supreme Court and was dismissed in November 2009.
  • In August 2010, Wisconsin Family Action and others filed a lawsuit in Dane County Circuit Court on the same basis.[5]

Path to the ballot

First approval: 2003 AJR 66 (JR 29) Second approval: 2005 SJR 53 (JR 30)[2]

See also

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link

External links

References