It’s the 12 Days of Ballotpedia! Your gift powers the trusted, unbiased information voters need heading into 2026. Donate now!
2014 ballot measure campaign expenditure recipients
Elections are boons in revenue for some businesses. In 2014, 37 companies and organizations made over $1 million by working for statewide ballot measure campaigns. While some of the biggest recipients of campaign expenditures were advertising agencies, like Greenstripe Media, GCW Media Services and Target Enterprises, LLC in California, consulting and petition drive companies were also amongst the top earners.
Expenditure recipients were reported for ballot measures in the following 20 states:
Note: Campaign expenditure reports in several states are still not finalized. Additional expenditures will be added when final reports are released for California, Maine, Montana and Nevada.
While South Dakota ballot measure campaigns expended money, they were not required to report to whom the money was expended.
All data was compiled from expenditures data made available through each state's respective campaign finance website.
By amount
Table 1 shows the 37 companies and organizations received over $1 million through statewide ballot measure campaign expenditures.
Purpose of expenditures
Campaign expenditures received by the top recipients were made for roughly five different purposes, including for "advertising," "consulting," "signatures," "research" and as "contributions."
- Firms specializing in advertising develop and produce advertisements, provide media placement for advertisements or both.
- Firms specializing in consulting provide legal services or aid in developing campaign strategies and communication.
- Firms specializing in signatures means they are petition drive companies.
- Firms specializing in research produce data for campaigns, including in the form of polls and interviews.
- One organization, the California Republican Party, received contributions over $1 million from ballot measure campaigns.
Overview
- Greenstripe Media made a total of $38,950,000, which was the most money of any company receiving ballot measure campaign expenditures. All of the firm's ballot measure revenue came from the opposition to California Proposition 46.
- GCW Media Services, which also played a role in California in 2014, received $30,530,296 from the opposition to CA Proposition 45.
- Target Enterprises, LLC received significant contributions from ballot measure campaigns in Arkansas, Colorado, Nevada and Oregon. In all, the company received $27,444,723 in 2014 from ballot measure campaigns.
- Compared to the highest contribution to a ballot measure campaign of 2014 -- Mile High USA's $19,316,254 in support of Colorado Amendment 68 -- three companies made more money than that off of ballot measure campaigns.
| Table 1: Recipients earning $1 million or more | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Firm or organization | Type | Amount | State(s) of operation | Measure(s) |
| 1 | Greenstripe Media | Advertising | $38,950,000 | California | CA Proposition 46 |
| 2 | GCW Media Services | Advertising | $30,530,296 | California | CA Proposition 45 |
| 3 | Target Enterprises, LLC | Advertising | $27,444,723 | Arkansas, Colorado, Nevada and Oregon | AR Issue 3, CO Amendment 68, CO Proposition 105, NV Question 3 and OR Measure 92 |
| 4 | Colorado Media & Mail | Advertising | $13,571,554 | Colorado | CO Amendment 68 |
| 5 | Porcaro Communications | Advertising | $11,107,891 | Alaska | AK Measure 1 |
| 6 | SDKnickerbocker, LLC | Advertising and Consulting | $9,705,710 | Oregon and Washington | OR Measure 92 and WA Initiative 594 |
| 7 | JPM&M, Inc. | Advertising and Consulting | $9,548,739 | California | CA Proposition 41, CA Proposition 45 and CA Proposition 46 |
| 8 | Goddard Gunster, Inc. | Advertising | $9,015,262 | Massachusetts | MA Question 2 |
| 9 | PCI Consultants, Inc. | Consulting and Signatures | $8,625,466 | California, Florida, Michigan and Washington | CA Proposition 47, FL Amendment 1, FL Amendment 2, MI Nov. Proposal 1, MI Proposal 2 and WA Initiative 1351 |
| 10 | Screen Strategies Media | Advertising | $8,310,177 | Colorado, North Dakota, Tennessee and Washington | CO Amendment 67, ND Nov. Measure 1, ND Measure 5, ND Measure 7, TN Amendment 1 and WA Initiative 1351 |
| 11 | Sadler Strategic Media, Inc. | Advertising | $8,197,185 | California | CA Proposition 1, CA Proposition 2 and CA Proposition 47 |
| 12 | GMMB Inc. | Advertising | $8,065,461 | Massachusetts | MA Question 3 |
| 13 | Joe Slade White Communications | Advertising | $5,738,218 | Michigan | MI Aug. Proposal 1 |
| 14 | Shallman Communications | Advertising and Consulting | $5,475,838 | California | CA Proposition 48 |
| 15 | Jamestown Associates, LLC | Advertising | $5,346,717 | Florida | FL Amendment 2 |
| 16 | Talbot Digital | Advertising | $3,960,957 | California | CA Proposition 46 |
| 17 | Amplified Strategies | Consulting and Signatures | $3,960,297 | North Dakota and Oregon | ND Measure 7 and OR Measure 92 |
| 18 | Buying Time, LLC | Advertising | $3,864,020 | Alaska and California | AK Measure 2, CA Proposition 46 and CA Proposition 48 |
| 19 | California Republican Party | Contribution | $2,897,000 | California | CA Proposition 45 and CA Proposition 46 |
| 20 | Arno Petition Consultants | Signatures | $2,488,138 | California | CA Proposition 48 |
| 21 | Media Analysis, Inc. | Advertising | $2,348,082 | Oregon | OR Measure 88, OR Measure 90 and OR Measure 91 |
| 22 | DCI Group, LLC | Consulting | $2,313,098 | Massachusetts | MA Question 3 |
| 23 | FieldWorks | Signatures | $2,246,321 | Nebraska, Oregon and Washington | NE Initiative 425, OR Measure 90, OR Measure 92 and WA Initiative 594 |
| 24 | Petta Ryan Consulting | Consulting | $2,120,938 | Massachusetts | MA Question 1 |
| 25 | Joe Trippi & Associates | Advertising | $1,835,709 | Maine, Michigan and Missouri | ME Question 1, MI Nov. Proposal 1, MI Proposal 2 and MO Amendment 1 |
| 26 | Kimball Petition Management | Signatures | $1,692,673 | California | CA Proposition 46 |
| 27 | Odney Advertising | Advertising | $1,617,016 | North Dakota | ND Measure 2, ND Measure 5 and ND Measure 7 |
| 28 | Mundy Katowitz Media, Inc. | Advertising | $1,538,586 | Florida | FL Amendment 1 |
| 29 | Pathfinder Communications | Advertising | $1,525,000 | Oregon | OR Measure 90 |
| 30 | NCC Media | Advertising | $1,356,896 | Michigan and Maine | MI Aug. Proposal 1 and ME Question 1 |
| 31 | Winner & Mandabach Campaigns | Consulting | $1,242,485 | Nevada and Oregon | NV Question 3 and OR Measure 92 |
| 32 | National Petition Management | Signatures | $1,188,729 | Missouri and North Dakota | MO Amendment 3 and ND Measure 7 |
| 33 | Public Opinion Strategies | Consulting and Research | $1,162,960 | Arizona, California, Oregon and Tennessee | AZ Proposition 122, CA Proposition 45, OR Measure 92, TN Amendment 1 and TN Amendment 2 |
| 34 | Heathcott Associates | Advertising | $1,139,281 | Arkansas | AR Issue 4 |
| 35 | Adelstein Liston | Advertising and Consulting | $1,116,908 | Missouri | MO Amendment 7 |
| 36 | Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Gross & Leoni, LLP | Consulting | $1,022,368 | California | CA Proposition 1, CA Proposition 2 and CA Proposition 46 |
| 37 | Arena Communications | Advertising and Fundraising | $1,002,928 | Michigan | MI Aug. Proposal 1 |
By state
Table 2 illustrates the expenditure recipients who received the most money in each state where ballot measure campaigns spent money.
Overview
- Target Enterprises, LLC was the largest recipient of ballot measure campaign expenditures in three states -- Colorado, Nevada and Oregon.
- California had the largest campaign expenditure to a single company. Greenstripe Media, Inc. received $38,950,000 from the opposition to Proposition 46.
- Wisconsin had the lowest earning top recipient of expenditures out of all ballot measure campaigns reporting expenditures. Madison-based Putnam Roby Williamson Communication was employed by supporters of Question 1 for $172,138.
| Table 2: Recipients ranked by state | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| State | Recipient | Amount | Measure(s) | ||
| Arizona | Spectrum Printing | $280,992 | Prop. 122 | ||
| Alaska | Porcaro Communications | $11,107,891 | Measure 1 | ||
| Arkansas | Heathcott Associates | $1,139,281 | Issue 4 | ||
| California | Greenstripe Media, Inc. | $38,950,000 | Prop. 46 | ||
| Colorado | Target Enterprises, LLC | $25,277,887 | Amend. 68 and Prop. 105 | ||
| Florida | Jamestown Associates, LLC | $5,346,717 | Amend. 2 | ||
| Hawaii | Anthology Marketing Group, Inc. | $442,324 | Amend. 2 | ||
| Maine | Joe Trippi & Associates | $903,041 | Question 1 | ||
| Massachusetts | Goddard Gunster, Inc. | $9,015,262 | Question 2 | ||
| Michigan | Joe Slade White Communications | $5,738,218 | Prop. 1 | ||
| Missouri | Adelstein Liston | $1,116,908 | Amend. 7 | ||
| Nebraska | FieldWorks | $515,375 | Initiative 425 | ||
| Nevada | Target Enterprises, LLC | $3,228,356 | Question 3 | ||
| New York | Shorr Johnson Magnus | $200,000 | Prop. 3 | ||
| North Dakota | Odney Advertising | $1,617,016 | Measures 2, 5 and 7 | ||
| Oregon | Target Enterprises, LLC | $12,453,172 | Measure 92 | ||
| Rhode Island | Advocacy Solutions | $399,089 | Question 4 | ||
| Tennessee | Screen Strategies Media | $2,901,606 | Amend. 1 | ||
| Washington | SKDKnickerbocker LLC | $5,468,499 | Initiative 594 | ||
| Wisconsin | Putnam Roby Williamson Communication | $172,138 | Question 1 | ||
See also
- 2014 ballot measures
- 2014 ballot measure petition signature costs
- 2014 post-election ballot measure campaign contributions
| |||||||||||||||||||