Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
2022 ballot measure polls
From Ballotpedia
| 2022 U.S. state ballot measures | |
|---|---|
2023 »
« 2021
| |
 | |
| Overview | |
| Scorecard | |
| Tuesday Count | |
| Deadlines | |
| Requirements | |
| Lawsuits | |
| Readability | |
| Voter guides | |
| Election results | |
| Year-end analysis | |
| Campaigns | |
| Polls | |
| Media editorials | |
| Filed initiatives | |
| Finances | |
| Contributions | |
| Signature costs | |
| State Ballot Measure Monthly | |
Have you subscribed yet?
Join the hundreds of thousands of readers trusting Ballotpedia to keep them up to date with the latest political news. Sign up for the Daily Brew.
| |
In 2022, voters in 38 states decided on 140 statewide ballot measures. You can view ballot measure election results here. Voters approved 96 (68.6%) and rejected 44 (31.4%).
- On November 8, voters in 37 states decided on 132 statewide ballot measures. Voters approved 90 and rejected 42 ballot measures.
- On December 10, voters in one state, Louisiana, decided on three ballot measures, all of which were approved.
- Earlier in 2022, voters in four states decided on five ballot measures. Voters approved three and rejected two of these measures.
This page aggregates the polls released for statewide ballot measures that were on the ballot in 2022. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.
Click the tabs below to see available polls for statewide ballot measures in each state.
Alaska
- See also: Alaska 2022 ballot measures
Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Alabama
- See also: Alabama 2022 ballot measures
Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Arizona
- See also: Arizona 2022 ballot measures
Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Arkansas
- See also: Arkansas 2022 ballot measures
- See also: 2022 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
| Arkansas Issue 1, Legislative Authority to Call a Special Session Amendment (2022) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Talk Business & Politics-Hendrix College | 10/17/2022-10/18/2022 | 974 LV | ± 3.9% | 44.5% | 33.5% | 22% |
| Question: "Issue 1, would give the legislature the authority to convene in extraordinary session (special session) by joint proclamation of House and Senate leadership or by written proclamation containing the signatures of at least two-thirds of the members of both the House and Senate. If the election were held today, would you vote for or against Issue 1?" | ||||||
| Talk Business & Politics-Hendrix College | 09/12/2022 | 835 LV | ± 3.8% | 41% | 24% | 35% |
| Question: "Issue 1, would give the legislature the authority to convene in extraordinary session (special session) by joint proclamation of House and Senate leadership or by written proclamation containing the signatures of at least two-thirds of the members of both the House and Senate. If the election were held today, would you vote for or against Issue 1?" | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
- See also: 2022 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
| Arkansas Issue 2, 60% Supermajority Vote Requirement for Constitutional Amendments and Ballot Initiatives Measure (2022) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Talk Business & Politics-Hendrix College | 10/17/2022-10/18/2022 | 974 LV | ± 3.9% | 38.5% | 38.5% | 23% |
| Question: "Issue 2, the “Constitutional Amendment and Ballot Initiative Reform Amendment”, would change the number of votes required for approval of initiated acts and constitutional amendments (both proposed by the people and referred by the legislature) to at least 60 percent of the votes cast. If the election were held today, would you vote for or against Issue 2?" | ||||||
| Talk Business & Politics-Hendrix College | 09/12/2022 | 835 LV | ± 3.8% | 34% | 32% | 36% |
| Question: "Issue 2, the “Constitutional Amendment and Ballot Initiative Reform Amendment”, would change the number of votes required for approval of initiated acts and constitutional amendments (both proposed by the people and referred by the legislature) to at least 60 percent of the votes cast. If the election were held today, would you vote for or against Issue 2?" | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
- See also: 2022 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
| Arkansas Issue 3, Government Burden of Free Exercise of Religion Amendment (2022) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Talk Business & Politics-Hendrix College | 10/17/2022-10/18/2022 | 974 LV | ± 3.9% | 36% | 39% | 25% |
| Question: "Issue 3, known as the “Arkansas Religious Freedom Amendment”, states that state government may never burden a person’s freedom of religion except in the rare circumstance that the government demonstrates that application of the burden to the person is in furtherance of a compelling government interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling government interest. If the election were held today, would you vote for or against Issue 3?" | ||||||
| Talk Business & Politics-Hendrix College | 09/12/2022 | 835 LV | ± 3.8% | 32.5% | 34.5% | 33% |
| Question: "Issue 3, known as the “Arkansas Religious Freedom Amendment”, states that state government may never burden a person’s freedom of religion except in the rare circumstance that the government demonstrates that application of the burden to the person is in furtherance of a compelling government interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling government interest. If the election were held today, would you vote for or against Issue 3?" | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
California
- See also: California 2022 ballot measures
- See also: Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls and 2022 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
| California Proposition 1, Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment (2022) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public Policy Institute of California | 9/2/22-9/11/22 | 1,060 LV | ± 5.4% | 69% | 25% | 6% |
| Question: "Proposition 1 is called the Constitutional Right to Reproductive Freedom. Legislative Constitutional Amendment. It amends the California Constitution to include the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion and the fundamental right to choose or refuse contraceptives. This amendment does not narrow or limit the existing rights to privacy and equal protection under California’s Constitution. There is no direct fiscal effect because reproductive rights are already protected by state law. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on Proposition 1?" | ||||||
| Rasmussen Reports | 8/10/22-8/11/22 | 1,006 LV | ± 3.0% | 66% | 27% | 7% |
| Question: "Do you support or oppose California’s Proposition 1 which states: “The state shall not deny or interfere with an individual’s reproductive freedom in their most intimate decisions, which includes their fundamental right to choose to have an abortion and their fundamental right to choose or refuse contraceptives.”" | ||||||
| U.S. Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies | 8/9/22-8/15/22 | 9,254 RV | ± 2.0% | 71% | 18% | 11% |
| Question: "In the November election, California voters will be asked to vote on Proposition One, a statewide constitutional amendment having to do with abortion rights. It reads as follows: “The state shall not deny or interfere with an individual’s reproductive freedom in their most intimate decisions, which includes their fundamental right to choose to have an abortion and their fundamental right to choose or refuse contraceptives.” If you were voting today, would you vote YES or NO on Proposition One?" | ||||||
| Public Policy Institute of California | 7/8/22 - 7/15/22 | 1,132 LV | ± 4.1% | 73% | 27% | 1% |
| Question: "Recently, the California legislature placed a constitutional amendment for voter approval on the November ballot that would prohibit the state from denying or interfering with an individual's reproductive freedom, including their right to choose to have an abortion and their right to choose or refuse contraceptives. Do you favor or oppose this constitutional amendment on abortion rights?" | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
- See also: Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls and 2022 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
| California Proposition 26, Legalize Sports Betting on American Indian Lands Initiative (2022) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public Policy Institute of California | 10/14/2022-10/23/2022 | 1,111 LV | ± 5.1% | 34% | 57% | 9% |
| Question: "Proposition 26 is called Allows In-Person Roulette, Dice Game, Sports Wagering on Tribal Lands. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute. It allows in-person sports betting at racetracks and tribal casinos, and requires that racetracks and casinos that offer sports betting to make certain payments to the state—such as to support state regulatory costs. The fiscal impact is increased state revenues, possibly reaching tens of millions of dollars annually. Some of these revenues would support increased state regulatory and enforcement costs that could reach the low tens of millions of dollars annually. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on Proposition 26?" | ||||||
| Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies (IGS) | 9/22/22 - 9/27/22 | 6,939 LV | ± 2.5% | 31% | 42% | 27% |
| Question: "PROPOSITION 26: ALLOWS IN-PERSON ROULETTE, DICE GAMES, SPORTS WAGERING ON TRIBAL LANDS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND STATUTE. Also allows sports wagering at certain horse racing tracks; private lawsuits to enforce certain gambling laws. Directs revenues to General Fund, problem-gambling programs, and enforcement. Fiscal Impact: Increased state revenues, possibly reaching tens of millions of dollars annually. Some of these revenues would support increased state regulatory and enforcement costs that could reach the low tens of millions of dollars annually. If the election were held today how would you vote on Proposition 26?" | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
- See also: 2022 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
| California Proposition 27, Legalize Sports Betting and Revenue for Homelessness Prevention Fund Initiative (2022) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public Policy Institute of California | 10/14/2022-10/23/2022 | 1,111 LV | ± 5.1% | 26% | 67% | 8% |
| Question: "Proposition 27 is called Allows Online and Mobile Sports Wagering Outside Tribal Lands. Initiative Constitutional Amendment. It allows Indian tribes and affiliated businesses to operate online and mobile sports wagering outside tribal lands. It directs revenues to regulatory costs, homelessness programs, and nonparticipating tribes. The fiscal impact is increased state revenues, possibly in the hundreds of millions of dollars but not likely to exceed $500 million annually. Some revenues would support state regulatory costs, possibly reaching the mid-tens of millions of dollars annually. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on Proposition 27?" | ||||||
| Public Policy Institute of California | 9/22/2022-9/27/2022 | 6,939 LV | ± 2.5% | 27% | 53% | 20% |
| Question: "PROPOSITION 27: ALLOWS ONLINE AND MOBILE SPORTS WAGERING OUTSIDE TRIBAL LANDS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND STATUTE. Allows Indian tribes and affiliated businesses to operate online/mobile sports wagering outside tribal lands. Directs revenues to regulatory costs, homelessness programs, nonparticipating tribes. Fiscal Impact: Increased state revenues, possibly in the hundreds of millions of dollars but not likely to exceed $500 million annually. Some revenues would support state regulatory costs, possibly reaching the mid-tens of millions of dollars annually. If the election were held today, how would you vote on Proposition 27?" | ||||||
| Public Policy Institute of California | 9/2/2022-9/11/2022 | 1,060 LV | ± 5.4% | 34% | 54% | 12% |
| Question: "Proposition 27 is called Allows Online and Mobile Sports Wagering Outside Tribal Lands. Initiative Constitutional Amendment. It allows Indian tribes and affiliated businesses to operate online and mobile sports wagering outside tribal lands. It directs revenues to regulatory costs, homelessness programs, and nonparticipating tribes. The fiscal impact is increased state revenues, possibly in the hundreds of millions of dollars but not likely to exceed $500 million annually. Some revenues would support state regulatory costs, possibly reaching the mid-tens of millions of dollars annually. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on Proposition 27?" | ||||||
| FM3 Research | 7/30/2022-8/1/2022 | 900 LV | ± 3.5% | 33% | 58% | 9% |
| Question: "Allows Online and Mobile Sports Wagering. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute. Allows Indian tribes and affiliated businesses to operate online/mobile sports wagering outside tribal lands. Directs revenues to regulatory costs, homelessness programs, nonparticipating tribes. Fiscal impact: Increased state revenues, possibly in the hundreds of millions of dollars but not likely to exceed $500 million annually. Some revenues would support state regulatory costs, possibly eaching the mid-tens of millions of dollars annually." | ||||||
| FM3 Research | 4/6/2022-4/13/2022 | 1094 LV | ± 3.1% | 36% | 53% | 10% |
| Question: "Allows Online and Mobile Sports Wagering. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute. Legalizes online and mobile sports wagering, which currently is prohibited, for persons 21 years and older. Such wagering may be offered only by federally recognized Indian tribes and eligible businesses that contract with them. Individuals placing bets must be in California and not located on Indian lands. Imposes 10% tax on sports-wagering revenues and licensing fees. Directs tax and licensing revenues first to regulatory costs, then remainder to: 85% to homelessness programs; 15% to nonparticipating tribes. Specifies licensing, regulatory, consumer-protection, and betting-integrity standards for sports wagering." | ||||||
| David Binder Research | 3/29/2022-4/4/2022 | 1,600 RV | ± 2.5% | 59% | 28% | 13% |
| Question: "Allows Online and Mobile Sports Wagering. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute. Legalizes online and mobile sports wagering, which currently is prohibited, for persons 21 years and older. Such wagering may be offered only by federally recognized Indian tribes and eligible businesses that contract with them. Individuals placing bets must be in California and not located on Indian lands. Imposes 10% tax on sports-wagering revenues and licensing fees. Directs tax and licensing revenues first to regulatory costs, then remainder to: 85% to homelessness programs; 15% to nonparticipating tribes. Specifies licensing, regulatory, consumer-protection, and betting-integrity standards for sports wagering." | ||||||
| University of California Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies | 2/3/2022-2/10/2022 | 4,477 RV | ± 3.0% | 45% | 33% | 22% |
| Question: "Various groups have proposed allowing sports betting in California, either online or in places such as in Indian casinos, racetracks, and other gaming venues, and have the state tax a portion of the proceeds. If you were voting on a constitutional amendment to allow sports betting in California would you be inclined to vote Yes or No?" | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
- See also: Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls and 2022 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
| California Proposition 31, Flavored Tobacco Products Ban Referendum (2022) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies (IGS) | 9/22/22 - 9/27/22 | 6,939 LV | ± 2.5% | 57% | 31% | 12% |
| Question: "PROPOSITION 31: REFERENDUM ON 2020 LAW THAT WOULD PROHIBIT THE RETAIL SALE OF CERTAIN FLAVORED TOBACCO PRODUCTS. A “Yes” vote approves, and a “No” vote rejects, a 2020 law prohibiting retail sale of certain flavored tobacco products. Fiscal Impact: Decreased state tobacco tax revenues ranging from tens of millions of dollars annually to around $100 million annually. If the election were held today, how would you vote on Proposition 31?" | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
Colorado
- See also: Colorado 2022 ballot measures
- See also: 2022 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
| Colorado Proposition 122, Decriminalization and Regulated Access Program for Certain Psychedelic Plants and Fungi Initiative (2022) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOX31, Channel 2, Emerson College Polling and The Hill | 9/18/2022-09/19/2022 | 1,000 LV | ± 3% | 36.2% | 40.9% | 22.8% |
| Question: "If the election were held today, would you support or oppose Proposition 122, which would decriminalize and regulate distribution for psychedelic plants and fungi such as DMT and psilocybin ("magic mushrooms")?" | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
Florida
- See also: Florida 2022 ballot measures
Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Georgia
- See also: Georgia 2022 ballot measures
Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Idaho
- See also: Idaho 2022 ballot measures
Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Illinois
- See also: Illinois 2022 ballot measures
Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Iowa
- See also: Iowa 2022 ballot measures
Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Kentucky
- See also: Kentucky 2022 ballot measures
Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Louisiana
- See also: Louisiana 2022 ballot measures
Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Maine
- See also: Maine 2022 ballot measures
Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Maryland
- See also: Maryland 2022 ballot measures
- See also: 2022 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
| Maryland Question 4, Marijuana Legalization Amendment (2022) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Washington Post-University of Maryland | 9/22/2022-9/27/2022 | 810 RV | ± 4.0% | 73% | 23% | 4% |
| Question: "Do you favor the legalization of the use of cannabis by an individual who is at least 21 years of age on or after July 1, 2023, in the state of Maryland?" | ||||||
| Goucher College Poll | 9/8/2022-9/12/2022 | 748 LV | ± 3.6% | 59% | 34% | 7% |
| Question: "Along with the various statewide and local races, a referendum on whether to legalize recreational marijuana for individuals aged 21 and older will appear on the ballot this November. Will you [vote for or vote against] the legalization of recreational marijuana?" | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
Massachusetts
- See also: Massachusetts 2022 ballot measures
- See also: Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls and 2022 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
| Massachusetts Question 3, Changes to Alcohol Retail Licensing Initiative (2022) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMass Amherst/WCVB | 10/20/22 - 10/26/22 | 700 RV | ± 4.3% | 39% | 38% | 23% |
| Question: "Question 3 - Would increase the statewide limit on the combined number of licenses for the sale of alcoholic beverages for off premises consumption that any one retailer could own or control." | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
- See also: Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls and 2022 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
| Massachusetts Question 1, Tax on Income Above $1 Million for Education and Transportation Amendment (2022) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMass Amherst/WCVB | 10/20/22 - 10/26/22 | 700 RV | ± 4.3% | 59% | 33% | 8% |
| Question: "Question 1 - Would establish an additional 4% state income tax on individuals with taxable incomes in excess of $1 million. Revenues from this tax would be used for public education, public colleges, and universities as well as for the repair and maintenance of roads, bridges, and public transportation." | ||||||
| Suffolk University/ Boston Globe/ NBC10 Boston/ Telemundo | 10/13/22 - 10/16/22 | 500 LV | ± 4.4% | 58.4% | 37.4% | 4.2% |
| Question: "A yes vote on a ballot question would amend the state Constitution to impose an additional 4% tax on that portion of incomes over one million dollars to be used on education and transportation. A no vote would make no change in the state Constitution relative to income tax. At this point, will you vote yes or no?" | ||||||
| MassINC Polling Group | 12/20/21 - 12/26/21 | 1,026 RV | N/A | 69.0% | 21.0% | 10.0% |
| Question: "There will be a question on the ballot in November 2022 that would create an additional 4% tax on the portion of someone’s income over $1 million a year. The minimum amount to trigger the tax would go up with inflation every year. The money collected would be dedicated to transportation and public education. Based on this description, would you support or oppose this additional 4% tax on the portion of someone’s income over $1 million a year?" | ||||||
| MassINC Polling Group | 12/8/20 - 12/20/20 | 1,522 RV | N/A | 72.0% | 20.0% | 7.0% |
| Question: "In 2022, there may be a ballot question that would create an additional 4% tax on income over $1 million a year. The minimum amount to trigger the tax would go up with inflation every year. The funds collected by the tax would be dedicated to public K-12 and higher education and transportation, including roads, bridges, and public transportation. Based on this description, would you support or oppose this additional 4% tax on income over $1 million a year?" | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
- See also: Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls and 2022 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
| Massachusetts Question 4, Remove Proof of Citizenship or Immigration Status for Driver's License Applications Referendum (2022) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMass Amherst/WCVB | 10/20/22 - 10/26/22 | 700 RV | ± 4.3% | 51% | 39% | 10% |
| Question: "Question 4 – Would keep in place a law that allows Massachusetts residents who cannot provide proof of lawful presence in the United States to obtain a standard driver’s license or learner’s permit if they meet all the other qualifications for a standard license or learner’s permit, including a road test and insurance, and provide proof of their identity, date of birth, and residency" | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
Michigan
- See also: Michigan 2022 ballot measures
- See also: 2022 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
| Michigan Proposal 3, Right to Reproductive Freedom Initiative (2022) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPIC-MRA | 10/28/22-11/1/22 | 600 LV | ± 4.0% | 57% | 40% | 4% |
| Question: "Proposal 3 is a proposed constitutional amendment that would: • Establish a new individual right to reproductive freedom, including right to make and carry out all decisions about pregnancy, such as prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, contraception, sterilization, abortion, miscarriage management, and infertility; • Allow the state to prohibit abortion after fetal viability unless needed to protect a patient’s life or physical or mental health; • Forbid state discrimination in enforcement of this right; prohibit prosecution of an individual, or a person helping a pregnant individual, for exercising rights established by this amendment; and invalidate all state laws that conflict with this amendment. After hearing this description of the proposal, if the election were held today, would you vote “yes” to adopt the proposal, or would you vote to NOT adopt it?" | ||||||
| WDIV/Detroit News | 10/26/22-10/28/22 | 600 LV | ± 4.0% | 55% | 41% | 4% |
| Question: "Proposal 3 would amend the state constitution to establish a new individual right to reproductive freedom, including right to make all decisions about pregnancy and abortion, allow state to regulate abortion in some cases, and forbid prosecution of individual exercising established right. This amendment would establish a new individual right to reproductive freedom, including right to make and carry out all decisions about pregnancy, such as prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, contraception, sterilization, abortion, miscarriage management and infertility. Allow state to regulate abortion after fetal viability, but not prohibit if medically needed to protect a patient’s life or physical or mental health. Forbid state discrimination in enforcement of this right, prohibit prosecution of an individual or a personal helping a pregnant individual for exercising rights established by this amendment. Invalidate state laws conflicting with this amendment. (This is the exact wording of the ballot proposal.)" | ||||||
| CNN | 10/13/22-10/18/22 | 651 LV | ± 4.9% | 54% | 45% | 2% |
| Question: "In the upcoming election, Michigan voters will consider Proposal 3, which would amend the Michigan state constitution to establish a new individual right to reproductive freedom, including the right to have an abortion. If the election were held today, would you be more likely to vote:" | ||||||
| Emerson College Polling | 10/12/22-10/14/22 | 580 LV | ± 4.0% | 52% | 38% | 10% |
| Question: "How do you plan to vote on Michigan Proposal 3, which would amend the State Constitution to establish the individual right to abortion, allowing the state to regulate abortion in some cases and forbid prosecution of individuals exercising the right to abortion." | ||||||
| EPIC-MRA | 10/6/22-10/12/22 | 600 LV | ± 4.0% | 60% | 33% | 7% |
| Question: "Proposal 3 is a proposed constitutional amendment that would: • Establish a new individual right to reproductive freedom, including right to make and carry out all decisions about pregnancy, such as prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, contraception, sterilization, abortion, miscarriage management, and infertility; • Allow the state to prohibit abortion after fetal viability unless needed to protect a patient’s life or physical or mental health; • Forbid state discrimination in enforcement of this right; prohibit prosecution of an individual, or a person helping a pregnant individual, for exercising rights established by this amendment; and invalidate all state laws that conflict with this amendment. After hearing this description of the proposal, if the election were held today, would you vote “yes” to adopt the proposal, or would you vote to NOT adopt it?" | ||||||
| The Glengariff Group, Inc. | 9/26/22-9/29/22 | 600 LV | ± 4.0% | 61.6% | 23.6% | 14% |
| Question: "Proposal 3 would amend the state constitution to establish a new individual right to reproductive freedom, including right to make all decisions about pregnancy and abortion, allow state to regulate abortion in some cases, and forbid prosecution of individual exercising established right. This amendment would establish a new individual right to reproductive freedom, including right to make and carry out all decisions about pregnancy, such as prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, contraception, sterilization, abortion, miscarriage management and infertility. Allow state to regulate abortion after fetal viability, but not prohibit if medically needed to protect a patient’s life or physical or mental health. Forbid state discrimination in enforcement of this right, prohibit prosecution of an individual or a personal helping a pregnant individual for exercising rights established by this amendment. Invalidate state laws conflicting with this amendment." | ||||||
| EPIC-MRA | 9/15/22-9/19/22 | 600 LV | ± 4.0% | 64% | 27% | 9% |
Question: "Proposal 3 is a proposed constitutional amendment that would:
|
||||||
| EPIC-MRA | 8/18/22-8/23/22 | 600 LV | ± 4.0% | 67% | 24% | 9% |
| Question: "On another topic, there will be a proposal on the November election ballot that if approved by voters, would establish a constitutional amendment that would protect a woman’s right to have an abortion in Michigan. If the election were held today, would you vote “yes” to support that proposal, or would you vote “no” to oppose it?" | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
- See also: 2022 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
| Michigan Proposal 1, Legislative Term Limits and Financial Disclosure Amendment (2022) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPIC-MRA | 10/28/22-11/1/22 | 600 LV | ± 4.0% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
| Question: "Proposal 1 would amend the state constitution to: • Require members of the legislature, governor, lieutenant governor, secretary of state, and attorney general to file annual public financial disclosure reports after 2023, including assets, liabilities, income sources, future employment agreements, gifts, travel reimbursements, and positions held in organizations except religious, social, and political organizations. • Replace current term limits for state representatives and state senators with a 12-year total limit in any combination between the house and senate. Current term limits restrict House members to 6 years and Senate members to 8 years. After hearing this description of the proposal, if the election were held today, would you vote “yes” to adopt the proposal, or would you vote “no” to NOT adopt it?" | ||||||
| WDIV/Detroit News | 10/26/22-10/28/22 | 600 LV | ± 4.0% | 71% | 26% | 3% |
| Question: "A proposal to amend the state constitution to require annual public financial disclosure reports by legislators and other state officers and change state legislator term limit to 12 total years in the legislature. This proposed constitutional amendment would require members of the legislature, the governor, lieutenant government, secretary of state, and attorney general to file annual public financial disclosure reports after 2023 including assets, liabilities, income sources, future employment agreements, gifts, travel reimbursements and positions held in organizations except religious, social and political organizations. Require the legislature to implement but not limit or restrict reporting requirements. Replace current term limits for state representatives and state senators to a 12-year total limit in any combination between the house of representatives and the senate, with the exception that a person elected in the senate in 2022 may be elected the number of times allowed when that person became a candidate. (This is the exact wording of the ballot proposal.)" | ||||||
| EPIC-MRA | 10/6/22-10/12/22 | 600 LV | ± 4.0% | 68% | 24% | 8% |
| Question: "Proposal 1 would amend the state constitution to: • Require members of the legislature, governor, lieutenant governor, secretary of state, and attorney general to file annual public financial disclosure reports after 2023, including assets, liabilities, income sources, future employment agreements, gifts, travel reimbursements, and positions held in organizations except religious, social, and political organizations. • Replace current term limits for state representatives and state senators with a 12-year total limit in any combination between the house and senate. Current term limits restrict House members to 6 years and Senate members to 8 years. After hearing this description of the proposal, if the election were held today, would you vote “yes” to adopt the proposal, or would you vote “no” to NOT adopt it?" | ||||||
| The Glengariff Group, Inc. | 9/26/22-9/29/22 | 600 LV | ± 4.0% | 66.3% | 15.4% | 17.8% |
| Question: "Proposal one would amend the state constitution to require annual public financial disclosure reports by legislators and other state officers and change the state legislator term limit to 12 total years in the legislature." | ||||||
| The Detroit News | 07/05/2022-07/08/2022 | 600 LV | ± 4% | 81% | 9% | 10% |
| Question: "A proposal to amend the state constitution to require annual public financial disclosure reports by legislators and other state officers and limit service of a legislator to 12 years. The proposed constitutional amendment would require members of the legislature, the governor, the lieutenant government, the secretary of state, and the attorney general to file annual public financial disclosure reports reporting assets, liabilities, income, positions held, future employment agreements, gifts, travel reimbursements and other payments. Require the legislation to implement but not limit or restrict the reporting requirements. Reduce current term limits for state representatives and state senators to a 12-year total limit in any combination between the house of representatives and the senate, with the exception that a person elected in the senate in 2022 may be elected the number of times allowed when that person became a candidate. Will you vote yes or no on this proposal?" | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
- See also: 2022 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
| Michigan Proposal 2, Voting Policies in Constitution Amendment (2022) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPIC-MRA | 10/28/22 - 11/01/22 | 600 LV | ± 4.0% | 68.0% | 29.0% | 3.0% |
| Question: "Proposal 2 would amend the constitution to: • Recognize fundamental right to vote without
harassing conduct; • Require military or overseas ballots be counted if postmarked by election day; •
Provide voter right to verify identity with photo ID or signed statement; • Provide voter right to single
application to vote absentee in all elections; • Require state-funded absentee-ballot drop boxes, and
postage for absentee applications and ballots; • Provide that only election officials may conduct postelection audits; • Require 9 days of early in-person voting; • Allow donations to fund elections, which
must be disclosed; • and require canvass boards certify election results based only on the official records
of votes cast. |
||||||
| The Glengariff Group, Inc. | 10/26/22-10/28/22 | 600 LV | ± 4.0% | 63.7% | 32.9% | 2.6% |
| Question: "Proposal 2 would amend the state constitution to add provisions regarding elections. This amendment would recognize the fundamental right to vote without harassing conduct. Require military or overseas ballots be counted if postmarked by election day. Provide voters right to verify identity with photo ID or signed statement. Provide voter right to single application to vote absentee ballot in all election. Require state funded absentee ballot drop boxes and postage for absentee applications and ballots. Provide that only election officials may conduct post-election audits. Require nine days of early in person voting. Allow donations to fund elections, which must be disclosed. Require canvass boards certify elections based only on the official records of votes cast." | ||||||
| EPIC-MRA | 10/06/22-10/12/22 | 600 LV | ± 4.0% | 67.0% | 23.0% | 10.0% |
| Question: "Proposal 2 would amend the constitution to: • Recognize fundamental right to vote without
harassing conduct; • Require military or overseas ballots be counted if postmarked by election day; • Provide voter right to verify identity with photo ID or signed statement; • Provide voter right to single application to vote absentee in all elections; • Require state-funded absentee-ballot drop boxes, and postage for absentee applications and ballots; • Provide that only election officials may conduct postelection audits; • Require 9 days of early in-person voting; • Allow donations to fund elections, which must be disclosed; • and require canvass boards certify election results based only on the official records of votes cast. After hearing this description of the proposal, if the election were held today, would you vote “yes” to adopt the proposal, or would you vote “no” to NOT adopt it?" |
||||||
| The Glengariff Group, Inc. | 9/26/22-9/29/22 | 600 LV | ± 4.0% | 70.3% | 14.3% | 15.3% |
| Question: "Proposal 2 would amend the state constitution to add provisions regarding elections. This amendment would recognize the fundamental right to vote without harassing conduct. Require military or overseas ballots be counted if postmarked by election day. Provide voters right to verify identity with photo ID or signed statement. Provide voter right to single application to vote absentee ballot in all election. Require state funded absentee ballot drop boxes and postage for absentee applications and ballots. Provide that only election officials may conduct post-election audits. Require nine days of early in person voting. Allow donations to fund elections, which must be disclosed. Require canvass boards certify elections based only on the official records of votes cast." | ||||||
| EPIC-MRA | 9/15/22-9/19/22 | 600 LV | ± 4.0% | 70.0% | 20.0% | 10.0% |
Question: ""Now I will ask how you would vote on two proposals that will appear on the November ballot. Proposal 2: This proposed constitutional amendment would:
|
||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
Mississippi
- See also: Mississippi 2022 ballot measures
Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Missouri
- See also: Missouri 2022 ballot measures
- See also: 2022 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
| Missouri Amendment 4, Allow Legislature to Require a City to Increase Funding without State Reimbursement for a Police Force Established by State Board Amendment (2022) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emerson College Polling/The Hill | 10/26/22-10/28/22 | 1,000 LV | ± 3.0% | 44% | 22% | 33% |
| Question: "Amendment 4 would increase the amount of police force funding to 25% of a municipality’s general revenue. How do you plan to vote on Amendment 4?" | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
Montana
- See also: Montana 2022 ballot measures
Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Nebraska
- See also: Nebraska 2022 ballot measures
Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Nevada
- See also: Nevada 2022 ballot measures
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
| Nevada Equal Rights Amendment (2022) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NV Indy Fest | 7/20/22-7/29/22 | 741 LV | ± 3.6% | 63% | 29% | 7% |
| Question: "Do you support raising the minimum wage for all workers in Nevada to $12.00 an hour by July 1st 2024." | ||||||
| Suffolk University | 8/14/22-8/17/22 | 500 LV | ± 4.4% | 70.8% | 20.2% | 7.8% |
| Question: "Another ballot initiative would change how Nevada’s minimum wage is handled. It closely mirrors existing state law but would allow the State Legislature to increase the minimum wage and would never let the state’s minimum wage fall below the federal minimum wage. At this point, do you strongly support, somewhat support, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose this ballot initiative?" | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
- See also: 2022 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
| Nevada Top-Five Ranked Choice Voting Initiative (2022) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suffolk University | 8/14/22-8/17/22 | 500 LV | ± 4.4% | 51.6% | 44% | 13.8% |
| Question: "There is a ballot initiative to open up Nevada’s top party primary races to all voters regardless of party, and to allow the ranking of your five top choices instead of voting for one. At this point, do you strongly support, somewhat support, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose this ballot initiative?" | ||||||
| OH Predictive Insights | 7/20/22-7/29/22 | 741 LV | ± 3.6% | 38% | 42% | 20% |
| Question: "Changing the current method of elections so that anyone can vote in a party's primary and where choices for general elections will use ranked-choice voting, whereby voters rank their preferences." | ||||||
| OH Predictive Insights | 7/8/22-7/19/22 | 924 RV | ± 3.22% | 42% | 27% | 32% |
| Question: "There will be a question on the ballot in November to change elections so that anyone can vote in a party's primary and where choices for general elections will use ranked-choice voting, whereby voters rank their preferences. Do you support this change to Nevada's elections?" | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
New Jersey
- See also: New Jersey 2022 ballot measures
Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
New Mexico
- See also: New Mexico 2022 ballot measures
- See also: 2022 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
| New Mexico Constitutional Amendment 1, Land Grant Permanent Fund Distribution for Early Childhood Education Amendment (2022) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research & Polling Inc. | 8/19/2022-8/25/2022 | 518 LV | ± 4.3% | 69% | 15% | 16% |
| Question: "Do you support or oppose the proposed constitutional amendment that would distribute more money from New Mexico’s Land Grant Permanent School Fund to be used for early childhood education, teacher compensation and K-12 education programs?" | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
North Dakota
- See also: North Dakota 2022 ballot measures
Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Oklahoma
- See also: Oklahoma 2022 ballot measures
Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Oregon
- See also: Oregon 2022 ballot measures
- See also: 2022 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
| Oregon Measure 114, Changes to Firearm Ownership and Purchase Requirements Initiative (2022) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OregonLive and The Oregonian | 9/23/2022-9/24/2022 | 600 LV | ± 4% | 51% | 39% | 10% |
| Question: "Will you vote for Measure 114, which would require a background check, safety training and a permit to acquire a firearm, would require that police maintain a firearm database and would criminally prohibit ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds?" | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
Rhode Island
- See also: Rhode Island 2022 ballot measures
Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
South Dakota
- See also: South Dakota 2022 ballot measures
- See also: 2022 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
| South Dakota Constitutional Amendment D, Medicaid Expansion Initiative (2022) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emerson College Polling | 10/19/22-10/21/22 | 1,500 LV | ± 2.4% | 50.9% | 21.5% | 27.5% |
| Question: "How do you plan to vote on Constitutional Amendment D, an amendment to the South Dakota Constitution which would expand Medicaid eligibility?" | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
- See also: 2022 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
| South Dakota Initiated Measure 27, Marijuana Legalization Initiative (2022) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emerson College Polling | 10/19/22-10/21/22 | 1500 | ± 2.4% | 39.7% | 50.5% | 9.8% |
| Question: "How do you plan to vote on Measure 27, which would legalize the possession, use, and distribution of marijuana for recreational purposes in South Dakota?" | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.
Utah
- See also: Utah 2022 ballot measures
Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Virginia
- See also: Virginia 2022 ballot measures
Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Washington
- See also: Washington 2022 ballot measures
Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Wisconsin
- See also: Wisconsin 2022 ballot measures
Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
Wyoming
- See also: Wyoming 2022 ballot measures
Ballotpedia does not have data on polls for certified ballot measures in this state. If you know of polls that should be posted here, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
See also
Footnotes
