Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

2023 Michigan legislative session

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
2022
2024


2023 Michigan legislative session
Seal of Michigan.png
General information
Session start:    January 11, 2023

Session end:    December 31, 2023

Leadership
Senate President
Garlin Gilchrist II (D)

House Speaker
Joe Tate (D)
Majority Leader
Senate: Winnie Brinks (D)
House: Abraham Aiyash (D)
Minority Leader
Senate: Aric Nesbitt (R)
House: Matt Hall (R)

Elections
Next Election:    November 5, 2024

Last Election:    November 8, 2022

Previous legislative sessions
20222021202020192018
Other 2023 legislative sessions


In 2023, the Michigan State Legislature was scheduled to convene on January 11, 2023, and adjourn on December 31, 2023.

The legislators serving in this session took office following the 2022 elections. Democrats won a 20-18 majority in the Senate and a 56-54 majority in the House. Democrats controlled the governorship, creating a Democratic state government trifecta. At the start of the 2023 session, Michigan was one of 23 state legislatures where neither party had a veto-proof supermajority in both chambers.

At the beginning of the 2023 legislative session:
  • Democrats held a majority in the Michigan state House and state Senate.
  • Michigan was one of 17 Democratic state government trifectas.
  • Michigan governor was Democrat Gretchen Whitmer
  • Leadership in 2023

    Michigan State Senate

    Michigan House of Representatives

    Partisan control in 2023

    See also: State government trifectas

    Michigan was one of 17 Democratic state government trifectas at the start of 2023 legislative sessions. A state government trifecta occurs when one political party holds the governor's office, a majority in the state Senate, and a majority in the state House. For more information about state government trifectas, click here.

    Michigan was also one of 23 state legislatures where neither party had a veto-proof supermajority in both chambers. Veto overrides occur when a legislature votes to reverse a veto issued by an executive such as a governor or the president. If one party has a majority in a state legislature that is large enough to override a gubernatorial veto without any votes from members of the minority party, it is called a veto-proof majority or, sometimes, a supermajority. To read more about veto-proof supermajorities in state legislatures, click here.

    The following tables show the partisan breakdown of the Michigan State Legislature in the 2023 legislative session.

    Michigan State Senate

    Party As of January 2023
         Democratic Party 20
         Republican Party 18
    Total 38

    Michigan House of Representatives

    Party As of January 2023
         Democratic Party 56
         Republican Party 54
    Total 110

    Regular session

    The list below shows up to 25 pieces of legislation in the 2023 legislative session that most recently passed both chambers of the legislature, were signed by the governor, or were approved by the legislature in a veto override. If no bills are displayed below, no legislation met these criteria in 2023. This information is provided by BillTrack50.

    Standing legislative committees

    See also: Standing committee and List of committees in Michigan state government


    A standing committee of a state legislature is a committee that exists on a more-or-less permanent basis, from legislative session to session, that considers and refines legislative bills that fall under the committee's subject matter.

    At the beginning of the 2023 legislative session, there were 42 standing committees in Michigan's state government, including 1 joint committees, 19 state Senate committees, and 22 state House committees.

    Joint committees

    • Joint Committee on Administrative Rules

    Senate committees

    • Advice and Consent Committee
    • Economic and Small Business Development Committee
    • Education and Career Readiness Committee
    • Elections Committee
    • Energy and Technology Committee
    • Environmental Quality Committee
    • Families, Seniors, and Veterans Committee
    • Finance Committee
    • Health Policy and Human Services
    • Insurance and Banking Committee
    • Judiciary and Public Safety Committee
    • Local Government Committee
    • Natural Resources Committee
    • Senate Agriculture Committee
    • Senate Appropriations Committee
    • Senate Government Operations Committee
    • Senate Oversight Committee
    • Senate Regulatory Reform Committee
    • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee

    House committees

    • Commerce and Tourism Committee
    • Communications and Technology Committee
    • Education Committee
    • Elections and Ethics Committee
    • Energy Committee
    • Families, Children, and Seniors Committee
    • Financial Services Committee
    • Health Policy Committee
    • House Agriculture Committee
    • House Appropriations Committee
    • House Government Operations Committee
    • House Oversight Committee
    • House Regulatory Reform Committee
    • Insurance Committee
    • Judiciary Committee
    • Local Government and Municipal Finance Committee
    • Military, Veterans and Homeland Security Committee
    • Natural Resources and Outdoor Recreation Committee
    • Rules and Competitiveness Committee
    • Tax Policy Committee
    • Transportation Committee
    • Workforce, Trades, and Talent Committee

    Legislatively referred constitutional amendments

    In every state but Delaware, voter approval is required to enact a constitutional amendment. In each state, the legislature has a process for referring constitutional amendments before voters. In 18 states, initiated constitutional amendments can be put on the ballot through a signature petition drive. There are also many other types of statewide measures.

    The methods by which the Michigan Constitution can be amended:

    See also: Article XII of the Michigan Constitution and Laws governing ballot measures in Michigan

    The Michigan Constitution can be amended in three different ways—a citizen-initiated process, a legislative process, and a state constitutional convention.

    Initiative

    See also: Initiated constitutional amendment

    An initiated constitutional amendment is a citizen-initiated ballot measure that amends a state's constitution. Eighteen (18) states allow citizens to initiate constitutional amendments.

    In Michigan, the number of signatures required for an initiated constitutional amendment is equal to 10% of the votes cast in the last gubernatorial election. A simple majority vote is required for voter approval.

    Legislature

    See also: Legislatively referred constitutional amendment

    A two-thirds vote is required during one legislative session for the Michigan State Legislature to place a constitutional amendment on the ballot. That amounts to a minimum of 74 votes in the Michigan House of Representatives and 26 votes in the Michigan State Senate, assuming no vacancies. Amendments do not require the governor's signature to be referred to the ballot.

    Convention

    See also: Convention-referred constitutional amendment

    According to Section 3 of Article XII of the Michigan Constitution, a question about whether to hold a state constitutional convention is to automatically appear on the state's ballot every 16 years starting in 1978. Michigan is one of 14 states that provides for an automatic constitutional convention question.

    The table below shows the last and next constitutional convention question election years:

    State Interval Last question on the ballot Next question on the ballot
    Michigan 16 years 2010 2026


    Historical partisan control

    The table below depicts the historical trifecta status of Michigan.

    Michigan Party Control: 1992-2025
    Two years of Democratic trifectas  •  Fourteen years of Republican trifectas
    Scroll left and right on the table below to view more years.

    Year 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    Governor R R R R R R R R R R R D D D D D D D D R R R R R R R R D D D D D D D
    Senate R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R D D D
    House D S S R R D D R R R R R R R R D D D D R R R R R R R R R R R R D D R

    Historical Senate control

    From 1990 to 2022, the Michigan State Senate was controlled by the Republican Party. Democrats won majority control in 2022. The table below shows the partisan history of the Michigan State Senate following every general election from 1990 to 2022. All data from 2006 or earlier comes from Michael Dubin's Party Affiliations in the State Legislatures (McFarland Press, 2007). Data after 2006 was compiled by Ballotpedia staff.

    Michigan State Senate election results: 1990-2022

    Year '90 '94 '98 '02 '06 '10 '14 '18 '22
    Democrats 18 16 15 16 17 12 11 16 20
    Republicans 20 22 23 22 21 26 27 22 18

    Republicans maintained control of the Michigan State Senate from 1990 until Democrats won a majority in 2022. Throughout the period, Democrats usually controlled between 11 and 20 seats, while Republicans controlled between 18 and 27 seats. From the 2010 elections through the 2014 elections, Republicans held more than the 26 seats required to override a gubernatorial veto. The Republican gains from 2010 to 2014 were in line with a national trend toward Republican state legislatures during the presidency of Barack Obama (D). From 2009 to 2017, Democrats experienced losses in state legislative elections, totaling 968 seats all together.

    Historical House control

    Between 1992 and 2022, partisan control of the Michigan House of Representatives switched six times. The table below shows the partisan history of the Michigan House of Representatives following every general election from 1992 to 2022. All data from 2006 or earlier comes from Michael Dubin's Party Affiliations in the State Legislatures (McFarland Press, 2007). Data after 2006 was compiled by Ballotpedia staff.

    Michigan House of Representatives election results: 1992-2022

    Year '92* '94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04 '06 '08 '10 '12 '14 '16 '18 '20 '22
    Democrats 55 54 58 52 51 47 52 58 67 47 51 47 47 52 52 56
    Republicans 55 56 52 58 59 63 58 52 43 63 59 63 63 58 58 54

    *Chamber controlled by power-sharing agreement

    Between 1992 and 2022, majority control of the state House changed six times. As a result of the 1992 elections, the chamber was tied at 55-55. A power-sharing agreement was reached between Democrats and Republicans where leadership of the chamber switched every month.[1] Republicans gained an outright majority in the 1994 elections when the party gained one seat. Republicans held the chamber until the 1996 elections when Democrats gained four seats and held a 58-52 majority. Republicans regained control of the chamber in the 1998 elections and held the chamber until the 2006 elections. During that period of time, the Republican majority spiked following the 2002 elections when the party held a 63-47 majority. Republicans lost five seats in the 2004 elections but maintained control of the chamber.

    Democrats took control of the House in the 2006 elections and held the chamber until the 2010 elections. In the 2008 elections, Democrats increased their majority from 58-52 to 67-43. In the 2010 elections, Republicans took control of the legislature after they flipped both chambers.[2] The Republican gains in 2010 were in line with a national trend toward Republican state legislatures during the presidency of Barack Obama (D). From 2009 to 2017, Democrats experienced losses in state legislative elections, totaling 968 seats altogether. Democrats regained majority control of the chamber in 2022.

    Ballotpedia's Election Administration Legislation Tracker

    Election tracker site ad.png


    State election laws are changing. Keeping track of the latest developments in all 50 states can seem like an impossible job.

    Here's the solution: Ballotpedia's Election Administration Legislation Tracker.

    Ballotpedia's Election Administration Tracker sets the industry standard for ease of use, flexibility, and raw power. But that's just the beginning of what it can do:

    • Ballotpedia's election experts provide daily updates on bills and other relevant political developments
    • We translate complex bill text into easy-to-understand summaries written in everyday language
    • And because it's from Ballotpedia, our Tracker is guaranteed to be neutral, unbiased, and nonpartisan

    Noteworthy event

    Michigan Senate files lawsuit againt Michigan House of Representatives

    On Feb. 3, 2025, the Michigan Senate and Majority Leader Sen. Winnie Brinks (D) filed a lawsuit in the Michigan Court of Claims against the Michigan House of Representatives, House Speaker Matt Hall (R), and House Clerk Scott Starr.[3] According to Brinks, she and the House filed the lawsuit because Hall, at the time, did not send nine bills that passed both legislative chambers to Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D) for potential signatures.[3]

    Both legislative chambers passed the nine bills at the center of the lawsuit during the 2023-2024 legislative sessions when Democrats had a 20-18 majority in the Senate and a 56-54 majority in the House. After their passage, then-House Speaker Joseph Tate (D) enrolled the bills.[4] However, they were not presented to Whitmer for potential signatures before the start of the 2025 legislative session.[4]

    When the Michigan Legislature convened for the 2025 legislative session on Jan. 8, 2025, Republicans assumed control of the House after winning a 58-52 majority in the 2024 general elections. Since there were no regularly scheduled elections for the Senate that year, Democrats maintained their 20-18 control of the chamber. Following the start of the session, the House elected Hall to serve as speaker.[5] According to The Detroit News' Beth LaBlanc, Hall then "ordered House Clerk Scott Starr to hold off on sending the last bills until a legal review could be conducted to determine what House Republicans' options were."[6]

    On Feb. 25, 2025, Michigan Court of Claims Judge Sima Patel heard arguments regarding the case.[7] Brinks and the Senate claimed it was Hall's responsibility to present the bills to Whitmer for potential signatures.[7] However, Hall and the House claimed that it was Tate's responsibility to ensure Whitmer received the bills.[7]

    On Feb. 27, 2025, Patel ruled that Hall should have sent the bills to Whitmer once Republicans took control of the House.[8] However, Patel said she would not force the House to send the bills, writing, "The procedures through which this takes place is a legislative function in which the Court will not interfere."[8]

    See also

    Elections Michigan State Government State Legislatures State Politics
    Ballotpedia Elections Badge-VOTE-no shadow-Square.jpg
    Michigan State Flag-Close Up.jpg
    State Houses-Tile image.png
    State Courts-Tile image.png

    External links

    Footnotes