This Giving Tuesday, help ensure voters have the information they need to make confident, informed decisions. Donate now!
2025 ballot measure polls
For 2025, 30 statewide ballot measures were certified for the ballot in nine states: California, Colorado, Louisiana, Maine, New York, Ohio, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin. Voters approved 25 (83%) and rejected five (17%) ballot measures.
- On November 4, voters in six states decided on 24 statewide ballot measures, approving 23 and rejecting one.
- Earlier in 2025, voters in three states—Louisiana, Ohio, and Wisconsin—decided on six ballot measures. Two were approved, and four were defeated.
This page aggregates the polls released for ballot measures that were on the ballot in 2025. You can share ballot measure polls with Ballotpedia at editor@ballotpedia.org.
Click the tabs below to see available polls for ballot measures in each state.
Contents
- 1 California Proposition 50, Use of Legislative Congressional Redistricting Map Amendment (2025)
- 2 Maine Question 1, Require Voter Photo ID and Change Absentee Ballot and Drop Box Rules Initiative (2025)
- 3 Maine Question 2, Extreme Risk Protection Orders to Restrict Firearms and Weapons Access Initiative (2025)
- 4 Texas Proposition 4, Allocate Portion of Sales Tax Revenue to Water Fund Amendment (2025)
- 5 Local
- 6 Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls
- 7 See also
- 8 Footnotes
California Proposition 50, Use of Legislative Congressional Redistricting Map Amendment (2025)
| Poll | Dates | Sample size | Margin of error | Support | Oppose | Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Berkeley IGS Poll Question"The special election (included) (includes) a statewide ballot measure about redistricting, Proposition 50. The following is a summary of Proposition 50 exactly as it (appeared) (will appear) on the election ballot. PROPOSITION 50: AUTHORIZES TEMPORARY CHANGES TO CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT MAPS IN RESPONSE TO TEXAS' PARTISAN REDISTRICTING. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Requires temporary use of new congressional district maps through 2030. Directs independent Citizens Redistricting Commission to resume enacting congressional district maps in 2031. Establishes policy supporting nonpartisan redistricting commissions nationwide. Fiscal Impact: One-time costs to counties of up to a few million dollars statewide to update election materials to reflect new congressional district maps. If have not yet voted: If you were voting today, how would you vote on Proposition 50? If already voted: How did you vote on Proposition 50?" | – | 8,141 RV | ± 2.00% | 60.0% | 38.0% | 2.0% |
CBS News/YouGov Question"If the election were held today, how would you vote on Proposition 50, which 'authorizes temporary changes to congressional district maps in response to Texas’ partisan redistricting'?" | – | 1,497 LV | ± 3.60% | 62.0% | 38.0% | – |
Emerson College Question"On November 4, 2025, there will be an election for Proposition 50, which Authorizes Temporary Changes to Congressional District Maps in Response to Texas' Partisan Redistricting. If the election for Proposition 50 were held today, would you vote yes or no?" | – | 900 LV | ± 3.19% | 57.4% | 36.8% | 5.7% |
Public Policy Institute of California Question"If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on Proposition 50?" | – | 943 LV | ± 4.10% | 56.0% | 43.0% | 1.0% |
co/efficient Question"Proposition 50 authorizes temporary changes to congressional district maps in response to Texas' partisan redistricting. This constitutional amendment requires temporary use of new congressional district maps through 2030, directs the independent Citizens Redistricting Commission to resume enacting congressional district maps in 2031, establishes policy supporting nonpartisan redistricting commissions nationwide; and has a one-time cost to counties of up to a few million dollars statewide. If the special election were held today, would you vote yes or no on Proposition 50?" | – | 976 LV | ± 3.14% | 56.0% | 39.0% | 5.0% |
Emerson College Question"In November 2025, there will be an election for Proposition 50, which authorizes temporary changes to California's congressional district maps in response to Texas' partisan redistricting. If the election for Proposition 50 were held today, would you vote yes or no?" | – | 1,000 RV | ± 3.00% | 50.6% | 34.1% | 15.3% |
Berkeley IGS Poll Question"Suppose a statewide ballot measure to change the way California Congressional District lines are drawn was put before voters in a special election later this year. The measure would ask voters to allow the state to temporarily replace the Congressional district lines drawn by the state’s independent citizens commission after the last census in 2020 for use in next year’s elections, if Texas goes forward with its own partisan mid-term redistricting plan. The measure would also return the authority to redraw California’s Congressional district lines to the state’s independent citizens commission for the next census in 2030. If you were voting today, would you vote YES or NO on this proposed ballot measure?" | – | 4,950 RV | ± 1.50% | 48.0% | 32.0% | 20.0% |
Emerson College Question"Do you support or oppose the proposal to redraw California's congressional map ahead of the 2026 Midterm Elections?" | – | 1,000 LV | ± 3.00% | 33.2% | 24.9% | 42.0% |
| Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters. | ||||||
- See also: Colorado 2025 ballot measures
- See also: Louisiana 2025 ballot measures
Maine Question 1, Require Voter Photo ID and Change Absentee Ballot and Drop Box Rules Initiative (2025)
| Poll | Dates | Sample size | Margin of error | Support | Oppose | Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
University of New Hampshire, The Survey Center Question"If the 2025 Maine Referendum Election were held today, how would you vote on the following ballot questions? Voter ID & Electoral Reform" | – | 995 LV | ± 3.10% | 48.0% | 49.0% | 3.0% |
| Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters. | ||||||
Maine Question 2, Extreme Risk Protection Orders to Restrict Firearms and Weapons Access Initiative (2025)
| Poll | Dates | Sample size | Margin of error | Support | Oppose | Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
University of New Hampshire, The Survey Center Question"If the 2025 Maine Referendum Election were held today, how would you vote on the following ballot questions? Red Flag Law" | – | 980 LV | ± 3.10% | 38.0% | 40.0% | 22.0% |
| Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters. | ||||||
- See also: Ohio 2025 ballot measures
Texas Proposition 4, Allocate Portion of Sales Tax Revenue to Water Fund Amendment (2025)
| Poll | Dates | Sample size | Margin of error | Support | Oppose | Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas 2036 Question"Last year, voters approved the creation of the Texas Water Fund to develop new water supplies and address aging infrastructure such as water pipes, with $1 billion invested in that fund. Do you favor or oppose the Texas Legislature dedicating an additional $1 billion per year to this fund over upcoming decades to meet our growing water needs?" | – | 802 LV | ± 3.50% | 68.0% | 15.0% | 16.0% |
| Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters. | ||||||
Local
Bexar County, Texas, Proposition A, Increase Hotel Occupancy Tax to Fund Coliseum Complex Venue Project Measure (November 2025)
| Poll | Dates | Sample size | Margin of error | Support | Oppose | Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UT San Antonio Question"Next, we are going to show you the text of two propositions that will be on the November ballot. Please tell us if you plan to vote For or Against each proposition. BEXAR COUNTY PROPOSITION - A THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. 'Authorizing Bexar County, Texas to provide for the planning, acquisition, establishment, development, construction, renovation, and financing of the Freeman Coliseum, Frost Bank Center, and other San Antonio Stock Show & Rodeo facilities (together, the 'Coliseum Complex Venue Project'), and related infrastructure, a venue project of the type described in and as authorized by Chapter 334, Texas Local Government Code, as amended (the 'Act') and as designated and described by the County's resolution dated June 10, 2025 (the 'Resolution'); and (i) to increase the County hotel occupancy tax to a maximum rate of two percent (2%) for the purpose of financing the Coliseum Complex Venue Project, pursuant to Subchapter H of the Act, and if approved, the maximum hotel occupancy tax rate imposed from all sources in Bexar County would be 17.00% of the price paid for a room in a hotel; and (ii) to authorize the use of the existing County short-term motor vehicle rental tax at a maximum rate of five percent (5%) on the gross rental receipts from the rental of motor vehicles in Bexar County, pursuant to Subchapter E of the Act, for the purpose of financing the Coliseum Complex Venue Project and approving the Resolution.'" | – | 660 LV | ± 3.80% | 44.0% | 41.0% | 15.0% |
| Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters. | ||||||
Bexar County, Texas, Proposition B, Increase Hotel Occupancy Tax to Fund San Antonio Spurs Arena Venue Project Measure (November 2025)
| Poll | Dates | Sample size | Margin of error | Support | Oppose | Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UT San Antonio Question"Next, we are going to show you the text of two propositions that will be on the November ballot. Please tell us if you plan to vote For or Against each proposition. BEXAR COUNTY PROPOSITION - B THIS IS A TAX INCREASE. 'Authorizing Bexar County, Texas to provide for the planning, acquisition, establishment, development, construction, or renovation of a new multipurpose arena designed primarily as the home venue for the San Antonio Spurs basketball team, and to be used for other purposes including, but not limited to, facilities for semi-professional, collegiate, and amateur basketball games, concerts, entertainment events, community events, and conventions (the 'Arena Venue Project'), and related infrastructure, a venue project of the type described in and as authorized by Chapter 334, Texas Local Government Code, as amended (the 'Act') and as designated and described by the County's resolution dated June 10, 2025 (the 'Resolution'); and (i) to increase the County hotel occupancy tax to a maximum rate of two percent (2%), for the purpose of financing the Arena Venue Project and approving the Resolution, pursuant to Subchapter H of the Act, and if approved, the maximum hotel occupancy tax rate imposed from all sources in Bexar County would be 17.00% of the price paid for a room in a hotel; and (ii) to authorize the use of the existing County short-term motor vehicle rental tax at a maximum rate of five percent (5%) on the gross rental receipts from the rental of motor vehicles in Bexar County, pursuant to Subchapter E of the Act, for the purpose of financing the Arena Venue Project, and approving the Resolution.'" | – | 660 LV | ± 3.80% | 40.0% | 46.0% | 14.0% |
| Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters. | ||||||
- See also: Washington 2025 ballot measures
- See also: Wisconsin 2025 ballot measures
Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls
- See also: Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls
For a ballot measure poll to be included on this page, the following information must be provided:
- the pollster (source);
- the questions asked;
- the dates of the survey;
- the number of respondents, specifying whether respondents were eligible voters, registered voters, or likely voters;
- the margin of error; and
- the poll results, including support and opposition.
See also
Footnotes
Topics: Absentee and mail voting • Administrative organization • Agriculture policy • Athletics and sports • Bail policy • Bond issues • Budget stabilization funds • Business taxes • Citizenship voting requirements • Civil trials • Constitutional rights • Criminal sentencing • Drinking water systems • Election administration and governance • Family-related policy • Firearms policy • Food policy • Healthcare governance • Higher education funding • Highways and bridges • Homestead tax exemptions • Income taxes • Juvenile criminal justice • Local government finance and taxes • Parks, land, and natural area conservation • Pollution, waste, and recycling policy • Property tax exemptions • Property taxes • Public assistance programs • Public education funding • Public employee retirement funds • Public school teachers and staff • Redistricting policy • Restricted-use funds • Revenue allocation • Revenue and spending limits • Sales taxes • Severance taxes • Sewage and stormwater • State judicial authority • State judicial selection • State judiciary oversight • State judiciary structure • State legislative authority • State legislative vote requirements • Vaccinations and disease policy • Veterans policy • Voter ID policy • Water storage
