Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
A. MAGNANO CO. v. HAMILTON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON, et al. (1934)

![]() |
A. MAGNANO CO. v. HAMILTON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON, et al. |
---|
Term: 1933 |
Important Dates |
Argued: March 7, 1934 |
Decided: April 2, 1934 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Louis Dembitz Brandeis • Pierce Butler • Benjamin Nathan Cardozo • Charles Evans Hughes • James Clark McReynolds • Owen Josephus Roberts • Harlan Fiske Stone • George Sutherland • Willis Van Devanter |
A. MAGNANO CO. v. HAMILTON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON, et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 2, 1934. The case was argued before the court on March 7, 1934.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Washington Western U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1930s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Hughes Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - state or local government tax
- Petitioner: Business, corporation
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact
- Respondent state: Washington
- Citation: 292 U.S. 40
- How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Charles Evans Hughes
- Who wrote the majority opinion: George Sutherland
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes