Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL v. MICHELLE THOMAS et al. (2006)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL v. MICHELLE THOMAS et al.
Term: 2005
Important Dates
Decided: April 17, 2006
Outcome
Vacated and remanded
Vote
9-0
Majority
Samuel AlitoStephen BreyerRuth Bader GinsburgAnthony KennedyJohn RobertsAntonin ScaliaDavid SouterJohn Paul StevensClarence Thomas

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL v. MICHELLE THOMAS et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 17, 2006.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Civil Rights - immigration and naturalization: permanent residence
  • Petitioner: attorney general of the United States, or his office
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Alien, person subject to a denaturalization proceeding, or one whose citizenship is revoked
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 547 U.S. 183
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Per curiam (no oral argument)
  • Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Unknown

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes