AMERICAN RAILROAD COMPANY OF PORTO RICO v. DIDRICKSEN (1913)

![]() |
AMERICAN RAILROAD COMPANY OF PORTO RICO v. DIDRICKSEN |
---|
Term: 1912 |
Important Dates |
Decided: January 27, 1913 |
Outcome |
Reversed and remanded |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
William Rufus Day • Charles Evans Hughes • Joseph Rucker Lamar • Horace Harmon Lurton • Joseph McKenna • Mahlon Pitney • Willis Van Devanter • Edward Douglass White |
Concurring |
Oliver Wendell Holmes |
AMERICAN RAILROAD COMPANY OF PORTO RICO v. DIDRICKSEN is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 27, 1913.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Puerto Rico U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1910s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the White Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Liability, other than as in sufficiency of evidence, election of remedies, punitive damages
- Petitioner: Railroad
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 227 U.S. 145
- How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Edward Douglass White
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Horace Harmon Lurton
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes