Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

AMERICAN STEEL FOUNDRIES v. TRI-CITY CENTRAL TRADES COUNCIL et al. (1921)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
AMERICAN STEEL FOUNDRIES v. TRI-CITY CENTRAL TRADES COUNCIL et al.
Term: 1921
Important Dates
Argued: January 17, 1919
Decided: December 5, 1921
Outcome
Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part
Vote
8-1
Majority
William Rufus DayOliver Wendell HolmesJoseph McKennaJames Clark McReynoldsMahlon PitneyWilliam Howard TaftWillis Van Devanter
Concurring
Louis Dembitz Brandeis
Dissenting
John Hessin Clarke

AMERICAN STEEL FOUNDRIES v. TRI-CITY CENTRAL TRADES COUNCIL et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on December 5, 1921. The case was argued before the court on January 17, 1919.

In an 8-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Illinois Southern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1920s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taft Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Unions - Labor-management disputes: antistrike injunction
  • Petitioner: employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer.
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Union, labor organization, or official of
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 257 U.S. 184
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Howard Taft
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: William Howard Taft

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes