ANDREW ALDRIDGE AND OTHERS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. NATHANIEL F. WILLIAMS (1844)

![]() |
ANDREW ALDRIDGE AND OTHERS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. NATHANIEL F. WILLIAMS |
---|
Term: 1845 |
Important Dates |
Argued: December 4, 1844 |
Decided: December 20, 1844 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
6-1 |
Majority |
John Catron • Peter Vivian Daniel • John McKinley • Joseph Story • Roger Brooke Taney • James Moore Wayne |
Dissenting |
John McLean |
ANDREW ALDRIDGE AND OTHERS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. NATHANIEL F. WILLIAMS is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on December 20, 1844. The case was argued before the court on December 4, 1844.
In a 6-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Maryland U.S. Circuit for the District of Maryland.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1840s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taney Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Federal Taxation - federal taxation, typically under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code
- Petitioner: Shipper, including importer and exporter
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact
- Respondent state: United States
- Citation: 44 U.S. 9
- How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Roger Brooke Taney
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Roger Brooke Taney
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes