Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey

ANDRE WALLACE v. KRISTEN KATO et al. (2007)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
ANDRE WALLACE v. KRISTEN KATO et al.
Term: 2006
Important Dates
Argued: November 6, 2006
Decided: February 20, 2007
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
7-2
Majority
Samuel AlitoAnthony KennedyJohn RobertsAntonin ScaliaClarence Thomas
Concurring
David SouterJohn Paul Stevens
Dissenting
Stephen BreyerRuth Bader Ginsburg

ANDRE WALLACE v. KRISTEN KATO et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 20, 2007. The case was argued before the court on November 6, 2006.

In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Illinois Northern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Civil Rights - liability, civil rights acts (cf. liability, governmental and liability, nongovernmental; cruel and unusual punishment, non-death penalty)
  • Petitioner: Injured person or legal entity, nonphysically and non-employment related
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit
  • Respondent state: Illinois
  • Citation: 549 U.S. 384
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Antonin Scalia

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes