ANGEL JAIME MONGE v. CALIFORNIA (1998)

![]() |
ANGEL JAIME MONGE v. CALIFORNIA |
---|
Term: 1997 |
Important Dates |
Argued: April 28, 1998 |
Decided: June 26, 1998 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
5-4 |
Majority |
Stephen Breyer • Anthony Kennedy • Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Clarence Thomas |
Dissenting |
Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • John Paul Stevens |
ANGEL JAIME MONGE v. CALIFORNIA is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 26, 1998. The case was argued before the court on April 28, 1998.
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the California State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Double jeopardy
- Petitioner: Person convicted of crime
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: State
- Respondent state: California
- Citation: 524 U.S. 721
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Sandra Day O'Connor
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes