Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey

ANTHONY HEDGPETH, WARDEN v. MICHAEL ROBERT PULIDO (2008)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
ANTHONY HEDGPETH, WARDEN v. MICHAEL ROBERT PULIDO
Term: 2008
Important Dates
Argued: October 15, 2008
Decided: December 2, 2008
Outcome
Vacated and remanded
Vote
6-3
Majority
Samuel AlitoStephen BreyerAnthony KennedyJohn RobertsAntonin ScaliaClarence Thomas
Dissenting
Ruth Bader GinsburgDavid SouterJohn Paul Stevens

ANTHONY HEDGPETH, WARDEN v. MICHAEL ROBERT PULIDO is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on December 2, 2008. The case was argued before the court on October 15, 2008.

In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the California Northern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Extra-legal jury influences: jury instructions (not necessarily in criminal cases)
  • Petitioner: State
  • Petitioner state: California
  • Respondent type: Prisoner, inmate of penal institution
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 555 U.S. 57
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Per curiam (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Unknown

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes