ANTHONY PALAZZOLO v. RHODE ISLAND, et al. (2001)

![]() |
ANTHONY PALAZZOLO v. RHODE ISLAND, et al. |
---|
Term: 2000 |
Important Dates |
Argued: February 26, 2001 |
Decided: June 28, 2001 |
Outcome |
Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded |
Vote |
5-4 |
Majority |
Anthony Kennedy • William Rehnquist • Clarence Thomas |
Concurring |
Sandra Day O'Connor • Antonin Scalia |
Dissenting |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • David Souter • John Paul Stevens |
ANTHONY PALAZZOLO v. RHODE ISLAND, et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 28, 2001. The case was argued before the court on February 26, 2001.
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Rhode Island State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Due Process - Due process: takings clause, or other non-constitutional governmental taking of property
- Petitioner: Real estate developer
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: State
- Respondent state: Rhode Island
- Citation: 533 U.S. 606
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Anthony Kennedy
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes