Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you. Check it out!

ARCADIA, OHIO, et al. v. OHIO POWER COMPANY, et al. (1990)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
ARCADIA, OHIO, et al. v. OHIO POWER COMPANY, et al.
Term: 1990
Important Dates
Argued: October 1, 1990
Decided: November 27, 1990
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
8-0
Majority
Harry BlackmunAnthony KennedySandra Day O'ConnorWilliam RehnquistAntonin ScaliaByron White
Concurring
Thurgood MarshallJohn Paul Stevens

ARCADIA, OHIO, et al. v. OHIO POWER COMPANY, et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on November 27, 1990. The case was argued before the court on October 1, 1990.

In an 8-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit (includes the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia but not the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which has local jurisdiction).

For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Economic Activity - Federal and some few state regulation of public utilities regulation: electric power
  • Petitioner: City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit
  • Petitioner state: Ohio
  • Respondent type: Electric or hydroelectric power utility, power cooperative, or gas and electric company
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 498 U.S. 73
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Antonin Scalia

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes