Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
ARIZONANS FOR OFFICIAL ENGLISH AND ROBERT D. PARK v. ARIZONA et al. (1997)

![]() |
ARIZONANS FOR OFFICIAL ENGLISH AND ROBERT D. PARK v. ARIZONA et al. |
---|
Term: 1996 |
Important Dates |
Argued: December 4, 1996 |
Decided: March 3, 1997 |
Outcome |
Vacated and remanded |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • John Paul Stevens • Clarence Thomas |
ARIZONANS FOR OFFICIAL ENGLISH AND ROBERT D. PARK v. ARIZONA et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 3, 1997. The case was argued before the court on December 4, 1996.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Arizona U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Judicial Power - Mootness (cf. standing to sue: live dispute)
- Petitioner: Governmental employee or job applicant
- Petitioner state: Arizona
- Respondent type: State
- Respondent state: Arizona
- Citation: 520 U.S. 43
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Ruth Bader Ginsburg
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes