Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

ARIZONANS FOR OFFICIAL ENGLISH AND ROBERT D. PARK v. ARIZONA et al. (1997)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
ARIZONANS FOR OFFICIAL ENGLISH AND ROBERT D. PARK v. ARIZONA et al.
Term: 1996
Important Dates
Argued: December 4, 1996
Decided: March 3, 1997
Outcome
Vacated and remanded
Vote
9-0
Majority
Stephen BreyerRuth Bader GinsburgAnthony KennedySandra Day O'ConnorWilliam RehnquistAntonin ScaliaDavid SouterJohn Paul StevensClarence Thomas

ARIZONANS FOR OFFICIAL ENGLISH AND ROBERT D. PARK v. ARIZONA et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 3, 1997. The case was argued before the court on December 4, 1996.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Arizona U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Judicial Power - Mootness (cf. standing to sue: live dispute)
  • Petitioner: Governmental employee or job applicant
  • Petitioner state: Arizona
  • Respondent type: State
  • Respondent state: Arizona
  • Citation: 520 U.S. 43
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Ruth Bader Ginsburg

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes