ARMOUR & COMPANY v. STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA (1916)

![]() |
ARMOUR & COMPANY v. STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA |
---|
Term: 1915 |
Important Dates |
Argued: March 3, 1916 |
Decided: April 3, 1916 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
7-0 |
Majority |
Oliver Wendell Holmes • Charles Evans Hughes • Joseph McKenna • James Clark McReynolds • Mahlon Pitney • Willis Van Devanter • Edward Douglass White |
ARMOUR & COMPANY v. STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 3, 1916. The case was argued before the court on March 3, 1916.
In a 7-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the North Dakota State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1910s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the White Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - federal or state consumer protection: typically under the Truth in Lending; Food, Drug and Cosmetic; and Consumer Protection Credit Acts
- Petitioner: Person convicted of crime
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: State
- Respondent state: North Dakota
- Citation: 240 U.S. 510
- How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Edward Douglass White
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Joseph McKenna
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes