ARTHUR CALDERON, WARDEN, et al. v. TROY ASHMUS, ETC. (1998)
- Justices
- CASES BY TERM
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2025-2026
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2024-2025
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2023-2024
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2022-2023
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2021-2022
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2020-2021
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2019-2020
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2018-2019
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2017-2018
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2016-2017
- Supreme Court cases, October term 2015-2016
- All earlier cases
- HISTORY OF THE COURT
- Recent vacancies
 |
| ARTHUR CALDERON, WARDEN, et al. v. TROY ASHMUS, ETC. |
|---|
| Term: 1997 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: March 24, 1998 |
| Decided: May 26, 1998 |
| Outcome |
| Reversed and remanded |
| Vote |
| 9-0 |
| Majority |
| Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • John Paul Stevens • Clarence Thomas |
| Concurring |
| Stephen Breyer • David Souter |
ARTHUR CALDERON, WARDEN, et al. v. TROY ASHMUS, ETC. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 26, 1998. The case was argued before the court on March 24, 1998.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the California Northern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Judicial Power - Standing to sue: justiciable question
- Petitioner: State
- Petitioner state: California
- Respondent type: Prisoner, inmate of penal institution
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 523 U.S. 740
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: William Rehnquist
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes
