Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
ASHTON et al. v. CAMERON COUNTY WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. ONE (1936)

![]() |
ASHTON et al. v. CAMERON COUNTY WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. ONE |
---|
Term: 1935 |
Important Dates |
Argued: April 29, 1936 |
Decided: May 25, 1936 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
5-4 |
Majority |
Pierce Butler • James Clark McReynolds • Owen Josephus Roberts • George Sutherland • Willis Van Devanter |
Dissenting |
Louis Dembitz Brandeis • Benjamin Nathan Cardozo • Charles Evans Hughes • Harlan Fiske Stone |
ASHTON et al. v. CAMERON COUNTY WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. ONE is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 25, 1936. The case was argued before the court on April 29, 1936.
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Texas Southern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1930s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Hughes Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Federalism - national supremacy: miscellaneous
- Petitioner: Stockholder, shareholder, or bondholder
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Bankrupt person or business, or business in reorganization
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 298 U.S. 513
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Charles Evans Hughes
- Who wrote the majority opinion: James Clark McReynolds
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes