Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK v. SOTO-LOPEZ et al. (1986)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK v. SOTO-LOPEZ et al.
Term: 1985
Important Dates
Argued: January 15, 1986
Decided: June 16, 1986
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
6-3
Judgment of the court
William Brennan
Majority
Harry BlackmunThurgood MarshallLewis Powell
Concurring
Warren BurgerByron White
Dissenting
Sandra Day O'ConnorWilliam RehnquistJohn Paul Stevens

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK v. SOTO-LOPEZ et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 16, 1986. The case was argued before the court on January 15, 1986.

In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the New York Southern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Burger Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Civil Rights - Residency requirements: durational, plus discrimination against nonresidents
  • Petitioner: State
  • Petitioner state: New York
  • Respondent type: Veteran
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 476 U.S. 898
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
  • What type of decision was made: Judgment of the Court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Warren Burger
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: William Brennan

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes