Aftermath of the January 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol
On January 6, 2021, during a joint session of Congress to count electoral votes, several pro-Donald Trump (R) demonstrations took place in Washington, D.C., to protest the 2020 presidential election results. Thousands of Trump supporters went to the Capitol Building as Congress was in its joint session. Around 2:15 p.m. ET, both chambers recessed as the group breached the Capitol and the building went into lockdown. To read more about the January 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol, click here.
In the immediate aftermath of the Capitol breach, the House of Representatives voted to impeach Trump in a 232-197 vote on January 13, 2021. One month later, on February 13, 2021, the Senate voted to acquit Trump. Fifty-seven senators voted to convict, and 43 voted to acquit. Conviction required a two-thirds vote of senators present. Following the impeachment vote, six Republican senators and representatives were censured by their state parties, four were rebuked, and in May 2021 House Republicans voted to remove Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) from party leadership.
There were several other noteworthy legislative and political responses to the Capitol breach throughout 2021 and 2022. In Congress, both chambers tasked committees to review the event. In the Senate, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Committee on Rules and Administration released a report on June 8, 2021, reviewing the security, planning, and response failures to the breach.
Some recommendations from the Senate report were made law. On December 22, 2021, President Joe Biden (D) signed the Capitol Police Emergency Assistance Act of 2021 (SB 3377). The bill allowed "the chief of the United States Capitol Police to unilaterally request the assistance of the DC National Guard or Federal law enforcement agencies in emergencies without prior approval of the Capitol Police Board." The bill was passed by unanimous consent by both chambers of Congress, with the Senate passage taking place on December 13 and the House passage on December 14.
In the House, the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol conducted an investigation that ran from June 30, 2021, through the end of the 117th Congress. The House committee conducted hearings throughout the process, and released its final report on December 22, 2022. The Republican National Committee voted to censure the two Republicans, Reps. Cheney and Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.), who served on the House Select Committee in February 2022.
On August 1, 2023, U.S. Department of Justice special counsel Jack Smith announced the indictment of former President Donald Trump (R) on criminal charges related to interference in the certification of the 2020 presidential election.
Click the links below to read more about:
- Federal indictment of Donald Trump
- Inquiries and investigations conducted by government entities;
- Laws passed in response to the event;
- The second impeachment and acquittal of President Donald Trump (R) for incitement of insurrection;
- Party censures of Republicans in response to the impeachment vote;
- Suspensions from social media platforms related to the event; and
- The effect on the counting of electoral votes.
Federal indictment of Donald Trump (2020 election certification case)
A federal grand jury charged former President Donald Trump (R) with four criminal counts related to the certification of the 2020 presidential election in August 2023. Trump pleaded not guilty.[1] Judge Tanya S. Chutkan oversaw the proceedings.[2]
Special counsel Jack Smith moved to dismiss the case without prejudice on November 25, 2024. The U.S. Constitution prohibits the criminal prosecution of a sitting president, and Donald Trump (R) won the 2024 presidential election on November 5. In his filing, Smith wrote "That prohibition is categorical and does not turn on the gravity of the crimes charged, the strength of the Government’s proof, or the merits of the prosecution, which the Government stands fully behind."[3]
In July 2024, the Supreme Court ruled on Trump's claim of presidential immunity in the case, saying in a 6-3 decision written by Chief Justice John Roberts that presidents have absolute immunity for core constitutional powers and no immunity for unofficial actions. The case was remanded to a lower court to determine which charges in the indictment could proceed.[4] Smith released a superseding indictment on August 27, 2024, which maintained the same charges against Trump with an adjusted presentation to adhere to the Supreme Court's ruling.[5]
The original indictment was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. It included the following charges alleged against Trump:
- conspiracy to defraud the United States "by using dishonesty, fraud and deceit to obstruct the nation’s process of collecting, counting, and certifying the results of the presidential election;"
- conspiracy to obstruct the certification of the electoral vote on January 6, 2021;
- obstruction of the certification of the electoral vote on January 6, 2021; and
- conspiracy "to injure, oppress, threaten, and intimidate one or more persons in the free exercise and enjoyment of" the right to vote and have one's vote counted.[6]
In November 2022, U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Smith to investigate whether any individual or entity "unlawfully interfered with the transfer of power following the 2020 presidential election or the certification of the Electoral College vote held on or about January 6, 2021."[7] Before this appointment, Smith served as a chief prosecutor for the special court in The Hague, Netherlands, where he investigated war crimes in Kosovo.[8]
Inquiries and investigations
House Select Committee
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) announced on June 24, 2021, that the House would establish a select committee to investigate the root causes of the breach of the U.S. Capitol and general security issues related to the incident. She said its leadership and members would be announced later.[9]
The House passed the resolution to form the committee on June 30, 2021, by a vote of 222-190. All Democrats and two Republicans—Reps. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) and Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.)—voted to support the measure.[10]
Membership
The following representatives are members of the committee:[11]
- Chairman: Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.)
- Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.)
- Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.)
- Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.)
- Rep. Stephanie Murphy (D-Fla.)
- Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.)
- Rep. Elaine Luria (D-Va.)
- Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.)
- Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.)
To read more about the formation of the committee, click here.
Hearings
The committee held its first hearing on July 27, 2021. Click the links below to view videos, transcripts, and witness lists for each hearing held by the committee:
- December 19, 2022
- October 13, 2022
- July 21, 2022
- July 12, 2022
- June 28, 2022
- June 23, 2022
- June 21, 2022
- June 16, 2022
- June 13, 2022
- June 9, 2022
- July 27, 2021
Final report
The committee issued a final report on its findings on December 22, 2022.[12] In his foreword to the report, Thompson wrote, "This report will provide greater detail about the multistep effort devised and driven by Donald Trump to overturn the 2020 election and block the transfer of power. Building on the information presented in our hearings earlier this year, we will present new findings about Trump’s pressure campaign on officials from the local level all the way up to his Vice President, orchestrated and designed solely to throw out the will of the voters and keep him in office past the end of his elected term." See the full report below.
Criminal referrals
During its final meeting on December 19, 2022, the committee announced criminal referrals to the U.S. Department of Justice against Donald Trump, Mark Meadows, Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Jeffrey Clark, and Kenneth Chesebro. The charges referred were inciting insurrection, conspiracy to defraud the United States, obstruction of an act of Congress, and one charge not specified at the time of the committee hearing.[13]
Noteworthy subpoenas
Donald Trump
On October 21, 2022, the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol formally issued a subpoena to Trump.[14] The committee voted unanimously to subpoena Trump during a public hearing on October 13. Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) offered the resolution, saying, "Our duty today is to our country, and our children, and our Constitution. We are obligated to seek answers directly from the man who set this all in motion. And every American is entitled to those answers so we can act now to protect our republic. [...] I am offering this resolution: that the committee direct the chairman to issue a subpoena for relevant documents and testimony under oath from Donald John Trump in connection with the January 6 attack on the United States Capitol."[15]
On October 13, Trump responded to the subpoena on social media, saying, "Why didn’t the Unselect Committee ask me to testify months ago? Why did they wait until the very end, the final moments of their last meeting? Because the Committee is a total 'BUST' that has only served to further divide our Country" and "The Unselect Committee knowingly failed to examine the massive voter fraud which took place during the 2020 Presidential Election - The reason for what took place on January 6th."[16][17]
Steve Bannon
On July 22, 2022, a federal jury convicted Bannon on two counts of contempt of Congress for his refusal to comply with a subpoena from the House Select Committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol. Bannon was sentenced to serve four months in prison.[18][19] The charges stemmed from his refusal to appear for a deposition or provide documents to the committee. Bannon was indicted on these charges on Nov. 12, 2021.[20] Judge Carl Nichols presided over the trial.[21]
In November 2022, Bannon appealed the verdict. While the appeal was ongoing, Bannon's sentence was stayed. A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit unanimously upheld the lower court's ruling in May 2024.[22] On June 6, 2024, Nichols ruled that Bannon had to report to prison on July 1, 2024.[23]
The committee issued a subpoena to Bannon on Sept. 23. After his refusal to comply, the committee unanimously voted to hold Bannon in contempt on Oct. 19.[24] The U.S. House of Representatives voted to approve the charge 229-202 on Oct. 21.[25]
Peter Navarro
On September 7, 2023, a federal jury convicted Navarro on two counts of contempt of Congress by a federal grand jury for his refusal to comply with a subpoena from the House Select Committee investigating the January 6, breach of the U.S. Capitol. The charges carried a minimum sentence of 30 days and a maximum sentence of one year in jail, and a maximum fine of $100,000.[26] On January 26, 2024, Navarro was sentenced to four months in jail.[27]
Navarro was indicted on June 3, 2022. He was charged with one contempt count for refusing to appear for a deposition and another for refusing to produce documents. The committee issued a subpoena to Navarro on February 9, 2022.[28] After his refusal to comply, the committee unanimously voted to hold Navarro in contempt on March 28.[29] The U.S. House of Representatives voted 220-203 to approve the charge on April 6.[30] On June 17, Judge Amit Priyavadan Mehta said the trial would begin on November 17.[31] The trial was delayed to January 2023.[32] The trial was delayed again on January 27, 2023.[33] The trial began on September 6, 2023.[34]
Senate Committees on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and Rules and Administration
The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration released a joint report on June 8, 2021, reviewing the security, planning, and response failures to the breach of the U.S. Capitol.[35]
The executive summary of the report listed the following findings regarding the event, United States Capitol Police (USCP), and other intelligence agencies:[35]
- The federal Intelligence Community—led by FBI and DHS—did not issue a threat assessment warning of potential violence targeting the Capitol on January 6.
- USCP’s intelligence components failed to convey the full scope of threat information they possessed.
- USCP was not adequately prepared to prevent or respond to the January 6 security threats, which contributed to the breach of the Capitol.
- Opaque processes and a lack of emergency authority delayed requests for National Guard assistance.
- The intelligence failures, coupled with the Capitol Police Board’s failure to request National Guard assistance prior to January 6, meant DCNG was not activated, staged, and prepared to quickly respond to an attack on the Capitol. As the attack unfolded, DOD required time to approve the request and gather, equip, and instruct its personnel on the mission, which resulted in additional delays.
The report made the following recommendations:
“ |
Based on the findings of the investigation, the Committees identified a number of recommendations to address the intelligence and security failures leading up to and on January 6. Recommendations specific to the Capitol Complex include empowering the USCP Chief to request assistance from the DCNG in emergency situations and passing legislation to clarify the statutes governing requests for assistance from executive agencies and departments in nonemergency situations. To address the preparedness of the USCP, the Committees recommend improvements to training, equipment, intelligence collection, and operational planning. The Committees further recommend intelligence agencies review and evaluate criteria for issuing and communicating intelligence assessments and the establishment of standing 'concept of operation' scenarios and contingency plans to improve DOD and DCNG response to civil disturbance and terrorism incidents. These scenarios and plans should detail what level of DOD or DCNG assistance may be required, what equipment would be needed for responding personnel, and the plan for command-and-control during the response.[36] |
” |
—Senate Report (Examining the U.S. Capitol Attack)[35] |
Legislative responses
Capitol Police Emergency Assistance Act of 2021
On December 22, 2021, President Joe Biden (D) signed the Capitol Police Emergency Assistance Act of 2021 SB 3377 into law. The bill allows "the chief of the United States Capitol Police to unilaterally request the assistance of the DC National Guard or Federal law enforcement agencies in emergencies without prior approval of the Capitol Police Board." The bill was passed by unanimous consent by both chambers of Congress, with the Senate passage taking place on December 13 and the House passage on December 14.[37] Unanimous consent is when a chamber expedites a proceeding by forgoing a vote on a measure or rule and instead opens the floor to objections by lawmakers. If no member objects, then the measure is passed by unanimous consent.[38]
This policy change was among the recommendations in the joint report of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration addressing the events of January 6, 2021. Prior to this bill becoming law, the chief of the United States Capitol Police had to request approval from the Capitol Police Board, a three-member board consisting of the chief architect of the Capitol and the House and Senate sergeants at arms, to request assistance from the D.C. National Guard, regardless of emergency status. The report said that process "constrain[ed] USCP’s ability to act quickly in an emergency and delay[ed] the provision of assistance."[35]
Second impeachment of President Donald Trump
- See also: Impeachment of Donald Trump, 2021
On February 13, 2021, former President Donald Trump (R) was acquitted of incitement of insurrection. Fifty-seven senators voted to convict and 43 voted to acquit. Conviction requires a two-thirds vote of senators present.[39]
On January 13, 2021, the House of Representatives voted to impeach Trump by a vote of 232-197 for incitement of insurrection. The resolution followed the January 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol, which disrupted a joint session of Congress convened to count the electoral votes from the 2020 presidential election. Ten Republicans supported the impeachment.[40][41]
The resolution alleged that Trump attempted to subvert and obstruct the certification of the election results and incited a crowd to breach the Capitol, leading to vandalism, threats to members of the government and congressional personnel, the death of law enforcement, and other seditious acts.[40] Click here to read the resolution.
On January 12, 2021, Trump called the impeachment resolution the "continuation of the greatest witch hunt in the history of politics." He added, "For Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer to continue on this path, I think it's causing tremendous danger to our country and it's causing tremendous anger."[42]
Republican censures following impeachment
- See also: State party censures and Republican primary challenges in response to Trump impeachment, 2021
State party censures
The following table lists whether each Republican member of Congress who voted to impeach or convict Trump was rebuked or censured by his or her state party. It does not include censures from county parties.
As of April 16, 2021, five of the Republicans had been censured by their state parties and four had been rebuked. Nine of the 10 House members had Republican primary challengers.
Overview of party response to Republicans who voted to impeach or convict Trump, 2021 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Official | State | Chamber of Congress | State party censure or rebuke | ||||
Richard Burr | North Carolina | Senate | Censure | ||||
Bill Cassidy | Louisiana | Senate | Censure | ||||
Susan Collins | Maine | Senate | None | ||||
Lisa Murkowski | Alaska | Senate | Censure | ||||
Mitt Romney | Utah | Senate | None | ||||
Ben Sasse | Nebraska | Senate | Rebuke | ||||
Pat Toomey | Pennsylvania | Senate | Rebuke | ||||
Liz Cheney | Wyoming | House | Censure | ||||
Anthony Gonzalez | Ohio | House | Censure | ||||
Jaime Herrera Beutler | Washington | House | Rebuke | ||||
John Katko | New York | House | None | ||||
Adam Kinzinger | Illlinois | House | None | ||||
Dan Newhouse | Washington | House | Rebuke | ||||
Peter Meijer | Michigan | House | None | ||||
Tom Rice | South Carolina | House | Censure | ||||
Fred Upton | Michigan | House | None | ||||
David Valadao | California | House | None |
Removal of Liz Cheney from House leadership
- See also: U.S. House leadership elections, 2021
Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), the third highest-ranking Republican in the House, was one of 10 House Republicans to support the second impeachment of President Donald Trump (R) following the January 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol.
House Republicans held a vote by secret ballot on February 3, 2021, regarding whether Cheney should be removed from leadership because of her vote to impeach Trump. Cheney retained her position with 145 votes to keep her in place, 61 to remove her, and one present vote.[43]
Beginning in late April 2021, several Republicans began to publicly criticize Cheney again for her comments against Trump and his allegations of voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election.[44][45] On May 12, 2021, Cheney was voted out of leadership by a voice vote in a private meeting.[46][47]
National party censures
On February 4, 2022, during the Republican National Committee's Winter Meeting, party officials voted to approve a resolution censuring Reps. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) and Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.).[48] Both lawmakers were appointees to the House select committee to investigate the root causes of the breach of the U.S. Capitol and general security issues related to the incident. The resolution said, in part, that "Representatives Cheney and Kinzinger are participating in a Democrat-led persecution of ordinary citizens engaged in legitimate political discourse, and they are both utilizing their past professed political affiliation to mask Democrat abuse of prosecutorial power for partisan purposes."[49]
In a tweet before the approval of the censure, Cheney said: "The leaders of the Republican Party have made themselves willing hostages to a man who admits he tried to overturn a presidential election and suggests he would pardon Jan. 6 defendants, some of whom have been charged with seditious conspiracy. I’m a constitutional conservative and I do not recognize those in my party who have abandoned the Constitution to embrace Donald Trump."[50]
In a statement on the censure, Kinzinger said: "Rather than focus their efforts on how to help the American people, my fellow Republicans have chosen to censure two lifelong Members of their party for simply upholding their oaths of office. [...] My efforts will continue to be focused on standing up for the truth and working to fight the political matrix that's led us to this point."[51]
Response from social media platforms
President Donald Trump (R) was suspended from Twitter for 12 hours on January 6, 2021, after tweeting about alleged 2020 election fraud and posting a video in response to the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.[52] Trump was also suspended from Facebook for 24 hours for two policy violations. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said, "His decision to use his platform to condone rather than condemn the actions of his supporters at the Capitol building has rightly disturbed people in the US and around the world. We removed these statements yesterday because we judged that their effect — and likely their intent — would be to provoke further violence."
Twitter lifted its permanent suspension of Trump on November 19, 2022. Elon Musk, who purchased Twitter on October 27, tweeted out a poll on November 18 asking whether to reinstate Trump.[53] The poll showed 51.8% voting yes and 48.2% voting no. Musk tweeted the following day, saying, "The people have spoken. Trump will be reinstated. Vox Populi, Vox Dei."[54]
Twitter permanently suspended Trump from the platform on January 8, 2021. The company said in a statement, "After close review of recent Tweets from the @realDonaldTrump account and the context around them — specifically how they are being received and interpreted on and off Twitter — we have permanently suspended the account due to the risk of further incitement of violence."[55]
The company said it evaluated two tweets Trump made on January 8, 2021, against its glorification of violence policy.
- "The 75,000,000 great American Patriots who voted for me, AMERICA FIRST, and MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, will have a GIANT VOICE long into the future. They will not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape or form!!!”
- "To all of those who have asked, I will not be going to the Inauguration on January 20th.”
Twitter said Trump's decision to not attend Joe Biden's (D) inauguration was being interpreted by supporters as delegitimizing the 2020 election results and could be interpreted as providing a target for violence. Twitter also said that the tweets were interpreted by some as supportive of those involved in the January 6 attack or future armed protests.[55]
Trump said, in tweets from the official presidential Twitter account, "As I have been saying for a long time, Twitter has gone further and further in banning free speech, and tonight, Twitter employees have coordinated with the Democrats and Radical Left in removing my account from their platform, to silence me — and YOU, the 75,000,000 great patriots who voted for me.” Twitter temporarily limited the use of this account to prevent the evasion of Trump's initial suspension.[56]
On January 7, 2021, Facebook extended the suspension to an indefinite period of time longer than two weeks. "We believe the risks of allowing President Trump to continue to use our service during this period are simply too great," Facebook officials said in a statement.[57] On January 21, 2021, Facebook referred the decision to uphold or overturn the suspension to an independent body with binding decision-making rights called the Oversight Board.[58]
On May 5, 2021, the Facebook Oversight Board upheld the suspension of Trump's Facebook and Instagram accounts. It also called the indefinite suspension an "indeterminate and standardless penalty" and requested that Facebook review this policy. Nick Clegg, vice president of global affairs and communications at Facebook, said, "We will now consider the board’s decision and determine an action that is clear and proportionate. In the meantime, Mr. Trump’s accounts remain suspended."[59]
Trump responded to the decision in a statement on the same day:
“ | What Facebook, Twitter, and Google have done is a total disgrace and an embarrassment to our Country. Free Speech has been taken away from the President of the United States because the Radical Left Lunatics are afraid of the truth, but the truth will come out anyway, bigger and stronger than ever before. The People of our Country will not stand for it! These corrupt social media companies must pay a political price, and must never again be allowed to destroy and decimate our Electoral Process.[36] | ” |
—President Donald Trump (R)[60] |
Facebook announced on June 4, 2021, that Trump would remain suspended until at least January 2023. Facebook said it would then review if there was continued serious risk to public safety, which could trigger an extension of the suspension.[61]
Clegg said, "In establishing the two year sanction for severe violations, we considered the need for it to be long enough to allow a safe period of time after the acts of incitement, to be significant enough to be a deterrent to Mr. Trump and others from committing such severe violations in future, and to be proportionate to the gravity of the violation itself."[61]
Effect on counting of electoral votes
Several Republican senators and representatives announced prior to January 6, 2021, that they planned to object to certain electoral votes due to allegations of voter fraud and irregularities. On December 30, 2020, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) became the first senator to do so.[62] Eleven other senators announced on January 2, 2021, that they would also object to the electoral votes from certain states:
- Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.)
- Mike Braun (R-Ind.)
- Ted Cruz (R-Texas)
- Steve Daines (R-Mont.)
- Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.)
- Ron Johnson (R-Wis.)
- John Kennedy (R-La.)
- James Lankford (R-Okla.)
- Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.)
- Roger Marshall (R-Kan.)
- Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.)
At least 140 House Republicans also planned to oppose counting the electoral votes, according to CNN.[63]
Following the breach of the Capitol, several Republicans withdrew their objections. No senators joined objections to the electoral votes from Georgia, Michigan, and Nevada, as had been planned.[64]
Sen. Kelly Loeffler (R-Ga.) said on the Senate floor, "When I arrived in Washington this morning, I fully intended to object to the certification of the electoral votes. However, the events that have transpired today have forced me to reconsider and I cannot now, in good conscience, object."[65]
See also
- Presidential election, 2020
- Breach of U.S. Capitol during electoral vote count (January 6, 2021)
- Reactions to U.S. Capitol breach during electoral vote count (January 6, 2021)
- Events in state capitals during electoral vote count (January 6, 2021)
Footnotes
- ↑ NBC News, "Trump indictment live updates: Effort to overturn 2020 election at center of charges," August 3, 2023
- ↑ NBC News, "Trump indictment live updates: Effort to overturn 2020 election at center of charges," August 3, 2023
- ↑ CourtListener, "Government's Motion to Dismiss," accessed November 25, 2024
- ↑ SCOTUSblog, "Announcement of opinions for Monday, July 1," July 1, 2024
- ↑ ABC News, "Trump charged in superseding indictment in election interference case following SCOTUS ruling," August 27, 2024
- ↑ United States District Court for the District of Columbia, "Indictment," accessed August 1, 2023
- ↑ Department of Justice, "Appointment of a Special Counsel," November 18, 2022
- ↑ CNN, " Who is Jack Smith, the special counsel behind the Trump classified documents indictment?" June 9, 2023
- ↑ Politico, "Pelosi announces select committee will investigate Jan. 6 attack," June 24, 2021
- ↑ CBS News, "House votes to create select committee to investigate January 6 attack," June 30, 2021
- ↑ House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, "Membership," accessed June 29, 2022
- ↑ CNN, "House Jan. 6 committee report delayed and anticipated to be released Thursday," December 21, 2022
- ↑ The New York Times, "Accusing Trump of insurrection, the Jan. 6 committee refers him to the Justice Dept." December 19, 2022
- ↑ January 6th Committee Website, "Subpoena," October 21, 2022
- ↑ C-SPAN, "Ninth Hearing on Capitol Attack," October 13, 2022
- ↑ Truth Social, "Donald Trump on October 13, 2022," accessed October 13, 2022
- ↑ Truth Social, "Donald Trump on October 13, 2022," accessed October 13, 2022
- ↑ The Hill, "Jury convicts Bannon of contempt of Congress," July 22, 2022
- ↑ The New York Times, "Bannon Sentenced to 4 Months in Prison for Contempt of Congress," October 21, 2022
- ↑ Department of Justice, "Two Charges Filed for Failing to Honor House Subpoena From Select Committee Investigating Jan. 6 Capitol Breach," November 12, 2021
- ↑ Politico, "Judge sets July 18 for Bannon ‘contempt of Congress’ trial," December 7, 2021
- ↑ Politico, "Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia," accessed June 6, 2024
- ↑ Associated Press, "Trump ally Steve Bannon must surrender to prison by July 1 to start contempt sentence, judge says," June 6, 2024
- ↑ Reuters, "U.S. House committee backs contempt charge against Trump aide Bannon," October 20, 2021
- ↑ The Wall Street Journal, "House Votes to Hold Steve Bannon in Criminal Contempt of Congress," October 21, 2021
- ↑ NBC News, "Former Trump adviser Peter Navarro is convicted of contempt of Congress in Jan. 6 investigation," September 7, 2023
- ↑ CNN, "Former Trump adviser Peter Navarro sentenced to 4 months in jail for defying congressional subpoena," January 25, 2024
- ↑ United States Department of Justice, "Peter Navarro Indicted for Contempt of Congress," June 3, 2022
- ↑ Roll Call, "Jan. 6 panel: Scavino, Navarro should be held in contempt," March 28, 2022
- ↑ Roll Call, "House votes to hold Navarro, Scavino in contempt of Congress," April 6, 2022
- ↑ The Washington Post, "Former Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro pleads not guilty to contempt," June 17, 2022
- ↑ The Hill, "Peter Navarro contempt trial postponed," November 11, 2022
- ↑ Roll Call, "Judge delays Peter Navarro trial on contempt of Congress charges," January 27, 2023
- ↑ CourtListener, "United States v. NAVARRO (1:22-cr-00200)," accessed September 6, 2023
- ↑ 35.0 35.1 35.2 35.3 U.S. Senate, "Examining the U.S. Capitol Attack: A Review of the Security, Planning, and Response Failures on January 6," June 8, 2021
- ↑ 36.0 36.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Congress.gov, "All Information (Except Text) for S.3377 - Capitol Police Emergency Assistance Act of 2021," accessed January 5, 2022
- ↑ Senate.gov, "Glossary," accessed January 5, 2022
- ↑ The New York Times, "Live Senate Vote Results: Impeachment Charge Against Trump," February 13, 2021
- ↑ 40.0 40.1 Associated Press, "Republicans block measure calling for quick removal of Trump," January 11, 2021
- ↑ CNN, "House Democrats introduce impeachment resolution, charging Trump with 'incitement of insurrection,'" January 11, 2021
- ↑ NBC New York, "Latest Updates: Trump Calls Impeachment Push ‘Continuation of Greatest Witch Hunt,'" January 12, 2021
- ↑ CNN, "House Republicans vote to keep Liz Cheney in leadership after she defends her impeachment vote," February 3, 2021
- ↑ Politico, "McCarthy and Cheney worlds apart after Florida retreat," April 27, 2021
- ↑ The New York Times, "Tensions among House G.O.P. leaders rise as a possible Cheney ouster looms," May 4, 2021
- ↑ Politico, "Cheney booted from Republican leadership spot," May 12, 2021
- ↑ The New York Times, "House Republicans Oust Liz Cheney From Leadership," May 12, 2021
- ↑ Independent, "GOP censures Cheney, Kinzinger, moves to pull out of debates," February 4, 2022
- ↑ Twitter, "Allan Smith on February 4, 2022," accessed February 4, 2022
- ↑ Twitter, "Liz Cheney on February 3, 2022," accessed February 4, 2022
- ↑ Twitter, "Adam Kinzinger on February 3, 2022," accessed Ferbuary 4, 2022
- ↑ NBC News, "Facebook and Twitter lock Trump's accounts after posting video praising rioters," January 6, 2021
- ↑ The New York Times, "Elon Musk Completes $44 Billion Deal to Own Twitter," October 27, 2022
- ↑ Twitter, "Elon Musk on November 19, 2022," accessed November 21, 2022
- ↑ 55.0 55.1 Twitter, "Permanent suspension of @realDonaldTrump," January 8, 2021
- ↑ TechCrunch, "President Trump responds to Twitter account ban in tweet storm from @POTUS account," January 8, 2021
- ↑ Facebook, "Our Response to the Violence in Washington," January 7, 2021
- ↑ Facebook, "Referring Former President Trump’s Suspension From Facebook to the Oversight Board," January 21, 2021
- ↑ Facebook, "Oversight Board Upholds Facebook’s Decision to Suspend Donald Trump’s Accounts," May 5, 2021
- ↑ ABC News, "Trump responds after Facebook ban extended pending additional review," May 5, 2021
- ↑ 61.0 61.1 Facebook Newsroom, "In Response to Oversight Board, Trump Suspended for Two Years; Will Only Be Reinstated if Conditions Permit," June 4, 2021
- ↑ The Washington Post, "Hawley’s plan to contest electoral college vote certification ensures drawn-out process," December 31, 2020
- ↑ CNN, "At least 140 House Republicans to vote against counting electoral votes, two GOP lawmakers say," December 31, 2020
- ↑ CBS News, "Key Republican senators withdraw objections to Electoral College count after Capitol siege," January 7, 2021
- ↑ ABC News, "Some GOP senators reverse objections to Electoral College certification after protesters storm Capitol," January 6, 2021