Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

Alabama oversight of federal grants

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Federalism Banner-Blue.png
Federalism
Federalism Icon 200x200.png

Key terms
Court cases
Major arguments
State responses to federal mandates
Federalism by the numbers
Index of articles about federalism

Federal grants make up a significant portion of state budgets, providing funding for programs in health care, education, infrastructure, and public assistance.[1][2] These funds are typically accompanied by policy conditions or reporting requirements that shape how states implement federally funded programs. In response, states have developed varying oversight systems to review, approve, and monitor federal funding.

This page summarizes federal grant funding and oversight in Alabama. It includes data on how federal dollars contribute to the state budget, highlights Alabama’s position relative to other states, and analyzes key laws related to grant coordination, transparency, and accountability. This research was last updated in September 2025.

HIGHLIGHTS
  • In fiscal year 2023, 39.8% of Alabama’s total state revenue came from intergovernmental sources—primarily federal grants—the 17-highest share among the 50 states. The state received approximately $17.9 billion in federal funds, the 23rd-highest total nationwide.[1]
  • Alabama law placed federal grant oversight under the Governor of Alabama through the Office of State Planning and Federal Programs and the Executive Budget Office, which coordinate, report, and evaluate federal funding, with legislative review provided by the Legislative Council.
  • This article includes information about the following topics:

    Background

    Federal grants are a major source of funding for state governments, supporting programs in areas such as health care, education, transportation, and public assistance.[2] These funds are distributed through a variety of mechanisms—including block grants, categorical grants, and formula-based programs—and are typically accompanied by policy conditions, reporting requirements, or other administrative mandates.

    Federal grants are reported as part of a state’s intergovernmental revenue, a category tracked annually by the United States Census Bureau. Intergovernmental revenue includes funds transferred from both federal and local governments, but federal sources account for the vast majority. In 2022, approximately 98% of intergovernmental revenue received by states came from the federal government.[3] In 2023—the most recent year for which data is available—states collectively received about $1.12 trillion in intergovernmental revenue, representing 36.7% of all general revenue.[1]

    Because of the scale and conditional nature of federal funding, many states have adopted statutory and administrative frameworks to oversee how agencies apply for, accept, and manage federal grants. These frameworks reflect broader federalism concerns—such as how states balance fiscal dependence with administrative autonomy, and how they respond to federal mandates that may influence state policy priorities.

    This research was last updated in July 2025.

    Top federal funding programs to states

    In fiscal year 2023, the federal government distributed over $1 trillion in grants to states. The largest programs included Medicaid, highway funding, rental assistance, and child nutrition. Medicaid alone accounted for 56.8% of federal grants to states, and the top 20 programs combined made up approximately 87.8% of total federal grant outlays to states.[4]


    Federal funding to Alabama

    Amount of federal grants to Alabama

    In 2023, Alabama received approximately $17.9 billion in intergovernmental revenue out of a total $44.9 billion in state revenue, the 23rd-highest amount among the 50 states.[1] The national average was approximately $22.3 billion per state. Across all states, intergovernmental revenue totaled about $1.12 trillion out of $3.04 trillion in general revenue.[1] In 2022, approximately 98% of intergovernmental revenue states received came from the federal government.[3]


    Percentage of Alabama budget funded by the federal government

    In fiscal year 2023, 39.8% of Alabama’s total state revenue came from intergovernmental sources—primarily federal grants—compared to 36.7% for state governments nationwide.[1] Alabama had the 17th-highest percentage of state revenue funded by the federal government.


    Intergovernmental revenue by state

    This table shows the percentage and amount of each state's total revenue that came from intergovernmental sources—primarily federal grants—in fiscal year 2023. It lists states in descending order by the share of revenue from these sources and includes total state revenue, intergovernmental revenue, and the percentage for each state. The data highlights how dependent each state is on federal funding as a portion of its overall budget.

    Intergovernmental revenue by state, 2023
    State Total revenue (thousands) Intergovernmental revenue (thousands) Percent
    Louisiana $44,396,718 $22,899,720 51.6%
    Arizona $60,891,976 $29,948,016 49.2%
    Missouri $45,073,525 $20,888,653 46.3%
    Wyoming $8,357,625 $3,792,590 45.4%
    Alaska $11,883,137 $5,341,732 45.0%
    Montana $10,689,677 $4,710,013 44.1%
    Kentucky $46,180,553 $20,254,290 43.9%
    Mississippi $26,046,854 $11,310,571 43.4%
    Rhode Island $12,286,091 $5,288,136 43.0%
    Oklahoma $37,833,350 $16,255,253 43.0%
    West Virginia $18,871,691 $8,025,296 42.5%
    Tennessee $48,344,600 $20,223,947 41.8%
    South Dakota $6,278,267 $2,570,818 40.9%
    Arkansas $29,702,938 $12,104,414 40.8%
    Georgia $70,031,565 $28,344,731 40.5%
    Indiana $62,196,503 $25,102,743 40.4%
    Alabama $44,884,391 $17,879,389 39.8%
    Maine $13,604,269 $5,360,431 39.4%
    New Hampshire $10,340,297 $4,052,066 39.2%
    South Carolina $46,113,727 $17,785,656 38.6%
    Nebraska $15,493,777 $5,972,778 38.5%
    Texas $213,481,319 $82,164,797 38.5%
    Pennsylvania $127,986,754 $49,211,832 38.5%
    Ohio $98,348,911 $37,785,734 38.4%
    Florida $141,946,520 $53,706,466 37.8%
    New York $259,552,404 $96,814,839 37.3%
    Michigan $90,192,191 $33,060,736 36.7%
    Vermont $9,063,120 $3,293,531 36.3%
    Colorado $41,909,412 $15,138,043 36.1%
    Maryland $58,597,846 $21,004,254 35.8%
    North Carolina $81,064,214 $28,814,153 35.5%
    Oregon $51,612,303 $17,510,543 33.9%
    New Mexico $40,359,510 $13,628,893 33.8%
    Nevada $24,219,218 $8,040,101 33.2%
    Iowa $31,265,753 $10,333,642 33.1%
    Washington $74,164,396 $24,480,102 33.0%
    California $417,100,727 $137,666,813 33.0%
    Minnesota $60,090,592 $19,468,582 32.4%
    Illinois $111,409,197 $35,838,931 32.2%
    Wisconsin $49,805,740 $15,984,042 32.1%
    Massachusetts $80,850,200 $25,519,880 31.6%
    New Jersey $100,285,531 $31,191,180 31.1%
    Connecticut $38,016,037 $11,800,021 31.0%
    Idaho $14,453,559 $4,456,686 30.8%
    Delaware $13,462,717 $4,105,552 30.5%
    Virginia $81,975,174 $23,958,775 29.2%
    North Dakota $10,349,350 $2,876,346 27.8%
    Utah $31,293,027 $8,603,744 27.5%
    Kansas $27,507,628 $7,524,382 27.4%
    Hawaii $19,221,682 $5,057,226 26.3%

    Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Survey of State Government Finances


    Alabama statutes on federal grant oversight

    Many states have statutory provisions that govern the oversight, approval, transparency, and auditing of federal grants received within the state. These laws typically assign responsibilities to executive agencies, the governor’s office, and the legislature to ensure proper management and accountability of federal funds. This research was last updated in September 2025.

    Executive oversight of federal grants

    Executive oversight of federal grants refers to statutes that assign responsibility to the governor’s office to review, approve, coordinate, or manage federal grants across the state.

    Alabama AL Code § 41-9-208 assigned an oversight role to the Office of State Planning and Federal Programs, which is directly under the Governor's supervision. \[5]

    (a) There is hereby created the Office of State Planning and Federal Programs within the office of the Governor and directly under his supervision and control. The Office of State Planning and Federal Programs shall consist of the Governor as the State Planning and Federal Programs Officer, a chief administrative officer to be designated as Director of the Office of State Planning and Federal Programs, who shall be appointed by the Governor, and serve at his pleasure, at a salary to be set in the same manner and with the same limitations as otherwise provided by law for executive department heads. The Director of the Office of State Planning and Federal Programs shall be a member of such boards and commissions, as they relate to his authority under the provisions of this article, and as required and currently authorized under the various federal programs for the director of the Alabama Development Office, and as approved by the Governor. All other employees necessary to carry out the duties and functions of the Office of State Planning and Federal Programs shall be employed subject to the provisions of the state Merit System laws and shall be entitled to the same rights and benefits thereunder. Salaries set for employees shall not exceed the salary set by law for executive department heads.

    (b) The Governor, through the Office of State Planning and Federal Programs, shall encourage comprehensive and coordinated planning and programming of the affairs of state government.

    (c) The Governor may direct any state department or other agency of state government, directly under his control and supervision, to furnish the Office of State Planning and Federal Programs with such personnel, equipment and services as are necessary to enable it to carry out its responsibilities and duties, and he may prescribe the terms thereof, including reimbursement of costs therefor. [6]


    Alabama AL Code § 41-19-4 assigned an oversight role to the Governor as related to the state budget.[7]

    Section 41-19-4

    Responsibilities of Governor as to Preparation and Administration of State Budget, Etc., Generally.

    The Governor is responsible for the preparation and administration of the state budget and the evaluation of the long range program plans, requested budgets and alternatives to state agency/department policies and programs and formulation and recommendation for consideration by the Legislature of a proposed comprehensive program and financial plan which shall cover all estimated receipts and expenditures of the state government, including all grants, loans and moneys received from the federal government. Proposed expenditures shall not exceed estimated revenues and resources.[6]


    Alabama 41-4-97 assigned an oversight role to the Executive Budget Office to compile and submit a federal funding report.[8]

    Annual Report by Certain State Agencies Regarding Receipt of Federal Funds. (e)(1) The Executive Budget Office, on or before January 1 of each year, shall prepare a report that includes the following:

    a. A compilation and summary of the reports the office receives from each state agency.

    b. A comparison of the aggregate value of federal receipts each state agency received for the previous fiscal year to the aggregate amount of federal funds appropriated by the Legislature to that state agency for that fiscal year.

    c. A list of state agencies that did not submit a report as required by this subsection. [6]

    Legislative oversight and transparency

    Legislative oversight and transparency refers to statutes requiring reports to or involvement from the legislature in managing or approving federal grants.

    Alabama AL Code § 41-4-97 assigned an oversight role to Legislative Council to review the Executive Budget Office report.[9]


    (2) The Executive Budget Office shall submit the report required under subdivision (1) to the Legislative Council by January 1.

    (3) Upon receipt of the report, the Legislative Council shall place the report on the agenda for review and consideration. Upon consideration of the report, the committee may elect to do any of the following:

    a. Recommend that the Legislature revise appropriations for a state agency.

    b. Take no action.

    c. Take any other action upon majority approval of the committee members.[6]

    Audit and financial oversight

    Audit and financial oversight refers to statutes related to auditing, financial tracking, or compliance for federal funds.

    Ballotpedia did not identify any statutes that assigned independent audit responsibilities specific to federal grants to the executive branch. Reporting requirements exist under § 41-4-97.

    Agency oversight of federal grant applications

    Agency oversight of federal grant applications refers to statutes that establish procedures or requirements for how state agencies request or acknowledge federal funding.

    Alabama AL Code § 41-9-207 assigned an oversight role to the Office of State Planning and Federal Programs.[10]

    (b) It is the purpose of this article to promote the development of the state’s human, economic and physical resources, and to promote the health, safety and general welfare of its citizens, by creating within the executive branch, an agency for comprehensive statewide planning and federal assistance oversight. The agency shall act as an advisory, consulting, monitoring and coordinating agency to harmonize activities at all levels of government, render technical assistance to governmental units and political subdivisions of this state and stimulate public interest and participation in the human resource, economic and physical development of the state as these relate to federal programs, federal grants and federal assistance.[6]

    Other state oversight of federal grants

    Click on a state to find out its oversight of federal grants, including how it reviews, approves, and manages federal funding through statutes, executive procedures, and legislative reporting.

    Nevada oversight of federal grantsAlaska oversight of federal grantsHawaii oversight of federal grantsArizona oversight of federal grantsUtah oversight of federal grantsNew Mexico oversight of federal grantsColorado oversight of federal grantsWyoming oversight of federal grantsCalifornia oversight of federal grantsOregon oversight of federal grantsWashington oversight of federal grantsIdaho oversight of federal grantsMontana oversight of federal grantsNorth Dakota oversight of federal grantsSouth Dakota oversight of federal grantsNebraska oversight of federal grantsKansas oversight of federal grantsOklahoma oversight of federal grantsTexas oversight of federal grantsMinnesota oversight of federal grantsIowa oversight of federal grantsMissouri oversight of federal grantsArkansas oversight of federal grantsLouisiana oversight of federal grantsMississippi oversight of federal grantsAlabama oversight of federal grantsWisconsin oversight of federal grantsIllinois oversight of federal grantsTennessee oversight of federal grantsKentucky oversight of federal grantsIndiana oversight of federal grantsMichigan oversight of federal grantsOhio oversight of federal grantsGeorgia oversight of federal grantsFlorida oversight of federal grantsSouth Carolina oversight of federal grantsNorth Carolina oversight of federal grantsVirginia oversight of federal grantsWest Virginia oversight of federal grantsPennsylvania oversight of federal grantsNew York oversight of federal grantsVermont oversight of federal grantsNew Hampshire oversight of federal grantsMassachusetts oversight of federal grantsRhode Island oversight of federal grantsConnecticut oversight of federal grantsNew Jersey oversight of federal grantsDelaware oversight of federal grantsMaryland oversight of federal grantsDistrict of Columbia oversight of federal grantsMaine oversight of federal grantsUS map.png


    See also

    External links

    Footnotes

    1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 U.S. Census Bureau, "2023 Annual Survey of State Government Finances: Historical Tables", accessed July 11, 2025
    2. 2.0 2.1 Every CRS Report, "Impacts of Federal Grants and Other Funds on State and Local Budgets", accessed August 12, 2025
    3. 3.0 3.1 U.S. Census Bureau, "2022 Census of Governments, State and Local Government Finance Tables", accessed July 11, 2025
    4. U.S. Government Publishing Office, "Budget FY 2025 – Table  12.3 – Total Outlays for Grants to State and Local Governments by Function, Agency, and Program: 1940–2024", accessed July 16, 2025
    5. Justia US Law, "Alabama Code § 41‑9‑208 – Office Created; Director; Salary; Comprehensive Planning Encouraged; Other Agencies to Aid Office", accessed July 11, 2025
    6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
    7. Justia US Law, "Alabama Code § 41‑19‑4 – Responsibilities of Governor as to Preparation and Administration of State Budget, Etc., Generally", accessed July 11, 2025
    8. Justia US Law, "Alabama Code § 41‑4‑97 – Annual Report by Certain State Agencies Regarding Receipt of Federal Funds", accessed July 11, 2025
    9. Justia US Law, "Alabama Code § 41‑4‑97 – Annual Report by Certain State Agencies Regarding Receipt of Federal Funds", accessed July 11, 2025
    10. Justia US Law, "Alabama Code § 41‑9‑207 – Legislative Findings and Declarations; Purpose of Article; Agencies; Duties and Goals", accessed July 11, 2025