Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

Alameda Unified School District board recall, Alameda County, California, 2010

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Alameda Unified School District School Board recall
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge.png
Officeholders
Tracy Jensen
Niel Tam
Ron Mooney
Recall status
Did not go to a vote
See also
Recall overview
Political recall efforts, 2010
Recalls in California
California recall laws
School board recalls
Recall reports

An effort to recall three members of the Alameda Unified School District (AUSD) school board in California was launched in August 2009. The recall effort was ended by its supporters in December 2009.[1][2]

Recall supporters

The recall effort was led by a group called S.E.R.V.E. Alameda. It was directed against three of the five school board members: Tracy Jensen, Niel Tam, and Ron Mooney.[3] The group reported in December 2009, "We have teams currently working hard towards getting the necessary signatures to qualify for the ballot."[4]

The reason given for launching the recall effort was an anti-bullying curriculum that Jensen, Tam, and Mooney voted to adopt. The curriculum included nine lesson plans. One of the lesson plans, Lesson 9, focused on anti-gay bullying. Those who supported the recall effort said they were upset that none of the lesson plans focused on race, ethnicity, gender, disability, nationality, or religion.[5]

Anti-bullying recommendations offered by district Superintendent Kirsten Vital in December 2009 included the recommendation to "Teach Lesson 9 as adopted by the Board of Education until we adopt literature lists for all six protected classes."[6][7]

Recall opponents

In response to the recall effort, Jensen said, "Sixty-two percent of Alameda teachers asked the school board to give them curriculum to teach students to respect others...The school board voted to make schools safer by adopting an anti-bullying curriculum that was approved by the California Department of Education.."[8]

In response to the recall effort, Tam said, "As a member of the Alameda Unified School District school board, it is my responsibility to think about the good of our children, teachers and parents. Providing a safe inclusive school environment is a top priority."[8]

In response to the recall effort, Mooney said, "Simply put, proponents of the recall have their facts wrong...Based on feedback I received, my vote represents the will of the majority of our families and residents — not the opinion of a small, vocal group." Mooney also said that his vote made "sure our schools are inclusive and safe for all children and families. I voted to support our teachers and administration, and to provide the tools they need to educate our youth."[8]

Opponents of the recall organized into a group called "No on Alameda Recall Campaign."[9]

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing recall in California

A total of 8,447 signatures, or 20% of Alameda voters, would have to have been collected per board member by December 12, 2009, in order for recall organizers to force recall elections.[8] A special recall election would have cost approximately $500,000.[10]

Background

Lesson 9 lawsuit

Some parents who objected to the Lesson 9 curriculum went to court to withdraw their children from the classes. In order for that to happen, the anti-bullying lesson plan would have had to have been defined as health education. In California, parents are allowed to withdraw their children from health education classes if their religious beliefs conflict with the content of a particular health education lesson plan. On November 25, 2009, Alameda County Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch issued a temporary ruling in which he said that Lesson 9 could not reasonably be construed as health education. This meant that parents could not withdraw their children from classes that taught this material.[11]

See also

External links

Footnotes