Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.
Alaska Measure 2, Move Legislature to Matanuska-Susitna Borough Initiative (2002)
| Alaska Measure 2 | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
| Election date |
|
| Topic State legislative processes and sessions |
|
| Status |
|
| Type Indirect initiated state statute |
Origin |
Alaska Measure 2 was on the ballot as an indirect initiated state statute in Alaska on November 5, 2002. It was defeated.
A "yes" vote supported moving all sessions of the Alaska State Legislature to the Matanuska-Susitna Borough. |
A "no" vote opposed moving all sessions of the Alaska State Legislature to the Matanuska-Susitna Borough. |
Election results
|
Alaska Measure 2 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| Yes | 74,650 | 32.77% | ||
|
|
153,127 | 67.23% | ||
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Measure 2 was as follows:
| “ | BALLOT MEASURE NO. 2 Initiative Moving Location of Legislative Sessions 01CHGE This bill would move all sessions of the state legislature to the Matanuska-Susitna (Mat-Su) Borough. If facilities fit for these sessions can not be found in that borough, sessions would be held in Anchorage until facilities are available in the Mat-Su Borough. The bill would repeal the requirements that before the state can spend money to move the legislature, the voters must be informed of the total costs as would be determined by a commission, and approve a bond issue for all bondable costs of the move. Should this initiative become law? YES NO | ” |
Background
State capitals ballot measures in Alaska
Between 1960 and 2025, nine measures have been on the Alaska ballot that concern the location of the state capital. One additional measure, from 2002, concerned the location of the state legislative sessions.
Of the measures, three (33.3%) were approved, and six (66.6%) were defeated. One of the measures, the 1976 referral, was neither approved nor defeated. In that measure, voters decided between three potential sites for a state capital.
| Year | Measure | Yes vote | No vote |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960 | Initiative 1, Cook Inlet State Capital Measure | 44.1% | 55.9% |
| 1962 | Initiative 1, State Capital Relocation Measure | 45.1% | 54.9% |
| 1974 | Initiative 1, New State Capital in Western Alaska Initiative | 56.7% | 43.3% |
| 1976 | Capital Relocation Site Selection Measure | N/A | N/A |
| 1978 | Bonding Proposition 10, New State Capital Bond Measure | 26.2% | 73.8% |
| 1978 | Ballot Proposition 3, Voter Approval Requirement for Capital Relocation Costs Initiative | 55.7% | 44.3% |
| 1982 | Measure 8, Relocation of State Capital Advisory Question | 47.1% | 52.9% |
| 1994 | Measure 3, State Capital in Wasilla Initiative | 45.3% | 54.7% |
| 1994 | Measure 5, Voter Approval Requirement for Capital Relocation Bonds Initiative | 77.4% | 22.6% |
| 2002 | Measure 2, Move Legislature to Matanuska-Susitna Borough Initiative | 32.8% | 67.2% |
Locations of proposed Alaskans capitals
Sitka was the capital of the territory of Alaska until 1906, when the capital city changed to Juneau. Between 1960 and 2002, six different locations were proposed as potential capital cities for the State of Alaska.
A 1960 ballot initiative would have moved the capital to the Cook Inlet-Railbelt region, which was described in contemporary news articles as the Anchorage, Alaska area.[1]
In 1976, voters chose between three cities potential cities for the new state capital: Larson Lake, Mount Yenlo, and Willow. Willow won the majority vote with 53.2% of voters selecting the city.
A 1994 ballot initiative would have moved the state capital to Wasilla, Alaska.
In 2002, Alaskan voters decided Measure 2. That measure would not moved the state capital, but it would have moved the location of the state legislative sessions to the Matanuska-Susitna Borough. In Alaska, boroughs act as a form of local government and function in the same way that counties do in other states.
State capitals ballot measures by state
- See also: State capitals ballot measures
Of the nine states that have placed measures on the ballot that concern the location of the capital city, Alaskans have seen the most on the ballot. Omitting the 2002 initiative, which would have moved the state's legislative sessions and not the capital city, Alaskans have decided nine ballot measures. Oklahomans, with the next largest amount of ballot measures, have decided five.
| State | Measures on the ballot | Approved by voters | Percentage approved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alaska | 9 | 4 | 44.4% |
| California | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Colorado | 1 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Maine | 1 | 1 | 100.0% |
| North Dakota | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Oklahoma | 5 | 1 | 20.0% |
| Oregon | 1 | 1 | 100.0% |
| South Dakota | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Washington | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Total | 22 | 9 | 40.9% |
Path to the ballot
An indirect initiated state statute is a citizen-initiated ballot measure that amends state statute. While a direct initiative is placed on the ballot once supporters file the required number of valid signatures, an indirect initiative is first presented to the state legislature. Legislators have a certain number of days, depending on the state, to adopt the initiative into law. Should legislators take no action or reject the initiative, a second round of signatures is required to put the initiative on the ballot for voters to decide.
See also
External links
Footnotes
 |
State of Alaska Juneau (capital) |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |
