Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Alaska Measure 3, Airborne Hunting Restrictions Initiative (1996)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Alaska Measure 3

Flag of Alaska.png

Election date

November 5, 1996

Topic
Hunting regulations
Status

ApprovedApproved

Type
Indirect initiated state statute
Origin

Citizens



Alaska Measure 3 was on the ballot as an indirect initiated state statute in Alaska on November 5, 1996. It was approved.

A "yes" vote supported prohibiting hunting of wild wolves, wolverines, foxes, or lynx on the same day a person was airborne.

A "no" vote opposed prohibiting hunting of wild wolves, wolverines, foxes, or lynx on the same day a person was airborne.


Election results

Alaska Measure 3

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

137,635 58.49%
No 97,690 41.51%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Measure 3 was as follows:

This bill would bar hunting wild wolf, wolverine, fox, or lynx the same day a person was airborne. However, the board of game could allow aerial wolf control if the Commissioner of Fish and Game declared a biological emergency, where wolves in a specific area were causing irreversible loss of a prey population. The Law wouldn’t apply to people airborne the same day on regular, scheduled commercial flights. Breaking the law would be a misdemeanor. The penalty could be jail time up to one year, a fine up to $5000, and forfeiture of aircraft or gear used in the offense.

Full Text

The full text of this measure is available here.


Path to the ballot

See also: Signature requirements for ballot measures in Alaska

An indirect initiated state statute is a citizen-initiated ballot measure that amends state statute. While a direct initiative is placed on the ballot once supporters file the required number of valid signatures, an indirect initiative is first presented to the state legislature. Legislators have a certain number of days, depending on the state, to adopt the initiative into law. Should legislators take no action or reject the initiative, a second round of signatures is required to put the initiative on the ballot for voters to decide.

See also


Footnotes