Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you. Check it out!

Alaska Repeal Top-Four Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative (2026)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Alaska Repeal Top-Four Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative

Flag of Alaska.png

Election date

November 3, 2026

Topic
Campaign finance and Primary election systems
Status

Qualified for the ballot

Type
Indirect initiated state statute
Origin

Citizens



The Alaska Repeal Top-Four Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative has qualified for the ballot in Alaska as an indirect initiated state statute on November 3, 2026.

A "yes" vote supports:

  • eliminating the top-four primaries and ranked-choice voting general elections in Alaska, 
  • establishing a party primary system, and
  • eliminating campaign finance provisions that require persons and entities that contribute more than $2,000 that were themselves derived from donations, contributions, dues, or gifts to disclose the true sources (as defined in law) of the political contributions.

A "no" vote opposes eliminating the campaign finance provisions, top-four primaries, and ranked-choice voting general elections in Alaska, thus keeping top-four primaries, ranked-choice voting general elections, and campaign finance provisions approved by voters in 2020


Overview

How would this ballot measure change Alaska's electoral system?

See also: Measure design

This initiative would eliminate the state's top-four ranked-choice voting (RCV) system, which voters approved in 2020. It would then replace the state's ranked-choice voting system with partisan primaries and general elections in which the candidate who received the highest number of votes won the election, which were in place prior to voters approving RCV in 2020. Known as plurality voting or first-past-the-post, the candidate would not have needed to win an outright majority to be elected. This is the most common voting system used in the United States.[1]

Currently, Alaska uses top-four primaries and ranked-choice voting (RCV) in general elections. Under this system, candidates run in a single primary election, regardless of a candidate's party affiliation. The four candidates that receive the most votes advance to the general election. At the general election, voters elect state and federal candidates using RCV. For state executive, state legislative, and congressional elections, voters rank the four candidates that advanced from their top-four primaries. A candidate needs a simple majority of the vote (50%+1) to be declared the winner of an election. If no candidate wins a simple majority of the vote, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated. People who voted for that candidate as their first choice have their votes redistributed to their second choice. The tabulation process continues in rounds until there are two candidates remaining, and the candidate with the greatest number of votes is declared the winner.[2]

Did Alaska voters decide on RCV before?

See also: Background

In 2020, Alaska voters adopted RCV by approving Ballot Measure 2. Voters approved the measure by 50.55%-49.45%.

In 2024, voters decided on another measure related to RCV, also called Ballot Measure 2. This measure was designed to repeal the top-four primaries and ranked-choice voting system approved by voters in 2020, but was not designed to make changes to the campaign finance disclosure requirements also included in the 2020 Ballot Measure 2. On November 5, 2024, voters rejected the measure with 49.9% voting 'yes' and 50.1% voting 'no'. As of 2026, this was the narrowest ballot measure result in Alaska's history.

Do other states use ranked-choice voting?

See also: Ranked-choice voting (RCV)

One other state, Maine, has adopted ranked-choice voting at the state level. Maine voters approved Question 5 in 2016, which adopted ranked-choice voting for congressional, state legislative, and gubernatorial elections. One other state, Hawaii, has implemented RCV in special federal elections and county council vacancies.

As of 2026, fourteen additional states contained jurisdictions that had implemented RCV at the local level. Seventeen states had enacted legislation banning the use of ranked-choice voting in statewide or local elections.

Measure design

Click on the following sections for summaries of the ballot measure’s provisions.[1]


Expand All
Replace top-four primaries with partisan primaries
Replace ranked-choice voting general elections with plurality voting general elections
Campaign finance disclosure changes


Text of measure

Full text

The full text of the ballot measure is below:[1]


Expand


Support

Supporters

Officials


Arguments

  • Gov. Mike Dunleavy (R): "Ranked-choice voting was pitched as a reform to solve a problem that, frankly, didn’t exist in Alaska. We were told it would reduce partisanship, promote consensus candidates, and make elections more fair. In reality, what we got was a system that confused voters, made outcomes less transparent, and created deep concerns about how votes are tabulated and who ultimately decides an election."
  • Judy Eledge, chair of Repeal Now: "We really feel like there should be one vote, one person in the United States. We're [one] of two states in the United States that has ranked choice voting. It's extremely confusing to people, most certainly people that are maybe older and don't understand it ... we're just wanting to get rid of it because we just don't think it's a fair system."


Opposition

Opponents

Ballotpedia has not located a campaign in opposition to the ballot measure. You can share campaign information or arguments, along with source links for this information, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Arguments

  • Rebecca Braun, member of the Better Elections Board: "It might not be perfect, but I think that it’s better. I don’t think there’s any voting system that like has no distortions. Mathematicians study this, and there’s almost nothing where you have 100% perfect outcomes. But this seems like to me a better system."


Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Alaska ballot measures
The campaign finance information on this page reflects the most recent scheduled reports that Ballotpedia has processed, which covered through October 7, 2025.


Repeal Now is the campaign registered in support of the initiative.[3] The campaign reported $247,356.45 in contributions and 185,455.95 in expenditures.

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $232,870.50 $14,485.95 $247,356.45 $170,970.00 $185,455.95
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total $232,870.50 $14,485.95 $247,356.45 $170,970.00 $185,455.95

Support

The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committees in support of the measure.[3]

Committees in support of Repeal Top-Four Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative
Committee Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Repeal Now $232,870.50 $14,485.95 $247,356.45 $170,970.00 $185,455.95
Total $232,870.50 $14,485.95 $247,356.45 $170,970.00 $185,455.95

Donors

The following were the top donors who contributed to the support committees.[3]

Donor Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions
Aurora Action Network $181,000.00 $0.00 $181,000.00
Beautiful America $7,450.00 $934.70 $8,384.70
Lucy Bauer $5,200.00 $169.00 $5,369.00
Anchorage Republican Womens Club $3,000.00 $0.00 $3,000.00
Capital City Republican Women $3,000.00 $0.00 $3,000.00

Background

2020 Alaska Ballot Measure 2

See also: Alaska Ballot Measure 2 (2020)

In 2020, Alaska voters approved Ballot Measure 2, which established top-four primaries, ranked-choice voting, and new campaign finance disclosure laws in the state. On November 3, 2020, voters approved the measure by 50.55%-49.45%. This measure was a citizen-initiated state statute, and made the ballot after enough valid signatures were submitted by Alaskans for Better Elections, and verified.

Ballot Measure 2 made changes to Alaska's election policies, including:[4]

  • Requiring persons and entities that contribute more than $2,000 that were themselves derived from donations, contributions, dues, or gifts to disclose the true sources (as defined by Measure 2) of the political contributions;
  • Replacing partisan primaries with open top-four primaries for state executive, state legislative, and congressional offices; and
  • Establishing ranked-choice voting for general elections, including for presidential elections, in which voters can rank the candidates that succeeded from the primaries.

In December 2020, a lawsuit was filed by the Alaskan Independence Party, Scott Kohlhaas, Robert M. Bird, and Kenneth P. Jacobus, against the state, declaring that Ballot Measure 2 was unconstitutional. The plaintiffs argued that Ballot Measure 2 violated their rights to free political association, free speech, and due process under the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution and Article 1 of the Alaska Constitution.[5] On July 29, 2021, Ballot Measure 2 was upheld by Judge Gregory Miller, who wrote in his opinion that plaintiffs had "not met their burden of showing that any part of the new law is unconstitutional on its face."[6] The decision was then appealed to the Alaska Supreme Court. On January 19, the Alaska Supreme Court ruled that the measure was constitutional.[7]

2024 Alaska Ballot Measure 2

See also: Alaska Ballot Measure 2 (2024)

In 2024, Alaskan voters rejected a measure to repeal the top-four primaries and RCV that were approved by voters in 2020. This initiative, also called Ballot Measure 2, qualified for the ballot after the Alaskans for Honest Elections campaign submitted enough verified signatures. On November 5, 2024, voters rejected the measure with 49.88% voting 'yes' and 50.12% voting 'no'. As of 2026, this was the narrowest ballot measure result in Alaska's history, with a vote margin of -0.23%.

This measure was designed to repeal the top-four primaries and ranked-choice voting system approved by voters in 2020, but was not designed to make changes to the campaign finance disclosure requirements also included in the 2020 Ballot Measure 2.

Top-four primary

See also: Top-four primary

A top-four primary is a type of primary election where all candidates are listed on the same ballot. Voters are allowed to choose one candidate per office regardless of the candidate's party affiliation. The top four vote-getters advance to the general election, regardless of their partisan affiliations. Consequently, it is possible for four candidates belonging to the same political party to win in a top-four primary and face off in the general election.[8]

Top-four primaries are similar to top-two primaries. As of September 2025, five states used top-two style primaries for at least some or all congressional and statewide primaries. Alaska was the only state that used a top-four system.

Ranked-choice voting (RCV)

See also: Ranked-choice voting (RCV)

A ranked-choice voting system (RCV) is an electoral system in which voters rank candidates by preference on their ballots.

There are multiple forms of ranked-choice voting. In instant-runoff voting, the most commonly used form of RCV for single-winner elections, if a candidate wins a majority of first-preference votes, they are the winner. If no candidate wins a majority of first-preference votes, the candidate with the fewest first-preference votes is eliminated. Ballots that ranked a failed candidate as their first, or highest choice, depending on the round, are then reevaluated and counted as first-preference ballots for the next-highest-ranked candidate in that round. A new tally is conducted to determine whether any candidate has won a majority of ballots. The process is repeated until a candidate wins an outright majority. Elements of this process, such as the number of candidates eliminated in each round, may vary by jurisdiction.[9][10][11]

As of January 2026, eight states had laws authorizing or requiring the use of RCV for certain elections, while 17 states had laws prohibiting or restricting the use of RCV.

  • RCV used statewide: Three states use RCV statewide. Alaska and Maine use RCV in some federal and statewide elections, while Hawaii uses it for certain statewide elections.
  • RCV used (or scheduled for use) in some localities: Fourteen states contain localities that either use or are scheduled to begin using RCV in municipal elections.
  • RCV prohibited: Seventeen states have adopted laws prohibiting the use of RCV in any elections.
  • No laws addressing RCV, not in use: Twenty-two states have no laws addressing RCV, and neither the state nor any localities in the state use it.[12]

History of ranked-choice voting ballot measures

As of 2025, a total of 14 measures regarding RCV were decided at the statewide level. Of these, 12 measures were designed to establish or support RCV, while two measures were designed to repeal or oppose RCV. Of the pro-RCV measures, five (41.7%) were approved and seven (58.3%) were defeated. Of the two anti RCV measures, one was approved, and one was defeated.

State Year Type Title Description Result Yes Votes No Votes
AK 2024

IndISS

Ballot Measure 2 Repeal the top-four ranked-choice voting (RCV) system that was adopted in 2020

Defeated

160,230 (50%)

160,973 (50%)

AZ 2024

CICA

Proposition 140 Require primaries in which candidates, regardless of partisan affiliation, appear on a single ballot and a certain number advance to the general election, and require general election candidates to receive a majority of votes

Defeated

1,284,176 (41%)

1,823,445 (59%)

CO 2024

CISS

Proposition 131 Establish top-four primaries and ranked-choice voting (RCV) for federal and state offices in Colorado

Defeated

1,385,060 (46%)

1,595,256 (54%)

ID 2024

CISS

Proposition 1 Establish top-four primaries and ranked-choice voting (RCV) for federal, state, and certain local offices in Idaho

Defeated

269,960 (30%)

618,753 (70%)

MO 2024

LRCA

Amendment 7 Prohibit the state and local governments from allowing noncitizens to vote and ranked-choice voting

Approveda

1,966,852 (68%)

906,851 (32%)

NV 2024

CICA

Question 3 Establish top-five primaries and ranked-choice voting (RCV) for federal and state offices in Nevada

Defeated

664,011 (47%)

747,719 (53%)

OR 2024

LRSS

Measure 117 Establish ranked-choice voting (RCV) for federal and state offices in Oregon

Defeated

893,668 (42%)

1,219,013 (58%)

NV 2022

CICA

Question 3 Provide for open top-five primaries and ranked-choice voting for general elections

Approveda

524,868 (53%)

466,635 (47%)

AK 2020

IndISS

Ballot Measure 2 Changes to Alaska's election policies, including top-four primaries, ranked-choice voting, and campaign finance laws

Approveda

174,032 (51%)

170,251 (49%)

MA 2020

IndISS

Question 2 Enacts a ranked-choice voting system for elections in Massachusetts

Defeated

1,549,919 (45%)

1,877,447 (55%)

ME 2018

VR

Question 1 Overturn sections of Legislative Document 1646 (LD 1646), which was written to postpone and repeal ranked-choice voting (RCV) unless a constitutional amendment was passed before December 1, 2021, to enable the legislature to determine election methods.

Approveda

149,900 (54%)

128,291 (46%)

ME 2016

IndISS

Question 5 Adopt ranked-choice voting for congressional, state legislative, and gubernatorial elections

Approveda

388,273 (52%)

356,621 (48%)

AK 2002

IndISS

Ballot Measure 1 Establish ranked-choice voting elections for state legislative, congressional, and presidential elections

Defeated

39,666 (36%)

69,683 (64%)

OR 1908

CICA

Measure Nos. 328-329 Allow for alternative state electoral systems

Approveda

48,868 (59%)

34,128 (41%)


Path to the ballot

Process in Alaska

See also: Laws governing the initiative process in Alaska

An indirect initiated state statute is a citizen-initiated ballot measure that amends state statute. There are nine (9) states that allow citizens to initiate indirect state statutes.

While a direct initiative is placed on the ballot once supporters file the required number of valid signatures, an indirect initiative is first presented to the state legislature. Legislators have a certain number of days, depending on the state, to adopt the initiative into law. Should legislators take no action or reject the initiative, the initiative is put on the ballot for voters to decide.

In Alaska, the number of signatures required for an indirect initiated state statute is equal to 10% of the votes cast in the last general election. Furthermore, proponents need to collect signatures in each of three-fourths (30) of Alaska's 40 state House districts. Signatures from each of the districts need to equal 7% of the districtwide vote in the last general election.

If the lieutenant governor certifies enough signatures as valid, the Alaska State Legislature can approve the indirect initiative or equivalent legislation, keeping the measure off the ballot. Otherwise, the initiative is certified to appear on the ballot for the first statewide election 120 days after the legislature's adjournment. A simple majority vote is required for voter approval.

The requirements to get an indirectly initiated state statute certified for the 2026 ballot:

Stages of this ballot initiative

  • December 26, 2024: The ballot initiative was filed with the Division of Elections.[13]
  • February 17, 2025: Lt. Gov. Nancy Dahlstrom approved the initiative for signature gathering.[13]
  • November 6, 2025: Repeal Now members submitted 48,000 signatures to the Division of Elections office.[14]
  • December 31, 2025: Lt. Gov. Nancy Dahlstrom announced that the initiative verified 42,837 qualified signatures across 40 house districts, exceeding the required minimum of 34,098 qualified signatures across 30 house districts.[15]

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Alaska

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Alaska.

How to vote in Alaska


See also

2026 ballot measures

View other measures certified for the 2026 ballot across the U.S. and in Alaska.

Alaska ballot measures

Explore Alaska's ballot measure history, including citizen-initiated ballot measures.

Initiative process

Understand how measures are placed on the ballot and the rules that apply.

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 Alaska Elections, "Initiative Text," accessed January 6, 2026
  2. Alaska Division of Elections, "Alaska's Better Elections Initiative," accessed January 6, 2020
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 APOC Online Reports, "Campaign Disclosure Forms," accessed January 6, 2026
  4. Alaska Division of Elections, "Alaska's Better Elections Initiative," accessed January 6, 2020
  5. Alaska Superior Court, "Kohlhaas v. Alaska," December 1, 2020
  6. Alaska Superior Court, "Kohlhaas v. Alaska," July 29, 2021
  7. ADN, "Alaska Supreme Court upholds elections ballot measure, state will use ranked-choice voting," accessed January 20, 2022
  8. Fairvote, "Top Four," accessed June 12, 2023
  9. Ranked Choice Voting Resource Center, "What is RCV?" November 22, 2022
  10. MinneapolisMN.gov, "Ranked-Choice Voting (RCV)," accessed January 7, 2026
  11. Washington Post, "Arlington reverses use of ranked-choice voting system for fall elections," accessed January 7, 2026
  12. Michigan is included in this category despite numerous local jurisdictions approving the use of RCV. Although Michigan does not explicitly prohibit the use of RCV, state election laws prevent the implementation of RCV. One jurisdiction in the state, Eastpointe, did use RCV between 2019-2023 as a result of federal enforcement under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. The jurisdictions of Ann Arbor, Ferndale, Kalamazoo, East Lansing, and Royal Oak have all authorized the use of RCV and plan to begin using the election method if legislation providing the state's authorization is signed into law.
  13. 13.0 13.1 Alaska Public Media , "Signatures can be gathered for 2026 repeal vote on Alaska voting system, lieutenant governor says," February 18, 2025
  14. ABC Alaska, "Alaska group delivers 48,000 signatures to repeal ranked-choice voting," November 6, 2025
  15. Office of Lt. Governor of Alaska, "Lt. Governor Nancy Dahlstrom Certifies Proper Filing of Ballot Initiative Petition 24ESEG," December 31, 2025
  16. Alaska Division of Elections, "Polling Place Hours," accessed November 24, 2025
  17. The Alaska Legislature, "Alaska Stat. § 15.15.320," accessed November 24, 2025
  18. 18.0 18.1 Alaska Division of Elections, "Who Can Register And Who Can Vote?" accessed November 24, 2025
  19. 19.0 19.1 Alaska Division of Elections, "Voter Registration," accessed November 24, 2025
  20. 20.0 20.1 20.2 Alaska Division of Elections, "State of Alaska Voter Registration Application," accessed November 24, 2025
  21. 21.0 21.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  22. Alaska Department of Revenue, “Automatic voter registration,” accessed November 24, 2025
  23. Alaska Division of Elections, "Presidential Elections," accessed November 24, 2025
  24. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  25. 25.0 25.1 The Alaska Legislature, "Alaska Stat. § 15.15.225," accessed November 25, 2025