Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

Andrew Crompton

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Andrew Crompton
Image of Andrew Crompton
Prior offices
Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court

Elections and appointments
Last election

November 2, 2021

Education

Bachelor's

Dickinson College, 1990

Law

Widener University School of Law, 1993

Personal
Birthplace
Pennsylvania
Religion
Christian
Profession
Judge
Contact

Andrew Crompton (also known as Drew) was a judge of the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court. He assumed office on January 7, 2020. He left office on January 3, 2022.

Crompton (Republican Party) ran for re-election for judge of the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court. He lost in the general election on November 2, 2021.

Crompton completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2021. Click here to read the survey answers.

Gov. Tom Wolf (D) nominated him on November 19, 2019, to succeed Robert Simpson on the court. The Pennsylvania State Senate voted to confirm him on December 18, 2019.[1][2]

Biography

Andrew Crompton was born in Abington, Pennsylvania. He earned a bachelor’s degree from Dickinson College in 1990 and a J.D. from Widener University Law School in 1993. Crompton was appointed to the Commonwealth Court in Pennsylvania effective January of 2020.[3]

Elections

2021

See also: Pennsylvania intermediate appellate court elections, 2021

General election

General election for Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court (2 seats)

Stacy Wallace and Lori A. Dumas defeated incumbent Andrew Crompton and David Spurgeon in the general election for Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court on November 2, 2021.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Stacy Wallace
Stacy Wallace (R) Candidate Connection
 
26.6
 
1,355,445
Image of Lori A. Dumas
Lori A. Dumas (D)
 
25.4
 
1,297,253
Image of Andrew Crompton
Andrew Crompton (R) Candidate Connection
 
25.0
 
1,274,899
Image of David Spurgeon
David Spurgeon (D)
 
23.0
 
1,175,974

Total votes: 5,103,571
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court (2 seats)

Lori A. Dumas and David Spurgeon defeated Amanda Green-Hawkins and Sierra Thomas Street in the Democratic primary for Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court on May 18, 2021.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Lori A. Dumas
Lori A. Dumas
 
29.7
 
517,311
Image of David Spurgeon
David Spurgeon
 
26.5
 
460,769
Image of Amanda Green-Hawkins
Amanda Green-Hawkins
 
25.6
 
445,400
Image of Sierra Thomas Street
Sierra Thomas Street
 
18.3
 
318,017
 Other/Write-in votes
 
0.0
 
289

Total votes: 1,741,786
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court (2 seats)

Stacy Wallace and incumbent Andrew Crompton advanced from the Republican primary for Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court on May 18, 2021.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Stacy Wallace
Stacy Wallace Candidate Connection
 
50.3
 
704,706
Image of Andrew Crompton
Andrew Crompton Candidate Connection
 
49.7
 
695,748

Total votes: 1,400,454
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Campaign themes

2021

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Andrew Crompton completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2021. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Crompton's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

For the past almost two years I have had the honor of serving as a Judge on the Commonwealth Court. I was appointed and confirmed by a strong bi-partisan vote in 2019 for a two year term ending January 2022. But if you want to serve a for a full ten year term, you must be elected. I am seeking a full term for the position I currently hold.

Prior to serving as a Commonwealth Court Judge, I was General Counsel in the Senate of Pennsylvania. I focused on drafting numerous laws that benefited families and small businesses across Pennsylvania and also wrote several laws that increased the openness of government.

As counsel, I also litigated dozens of cases before the Commonwealth and Supreme Courts, as well as in federal court. What does this all mean? The Commonwealth Court ensures that the government is following the law! I have worked in the Legislative, Executive and now Judicial branch. I have the right experience to ensure that government agencies and elected officials adhere to the rule of law.

On the personal side, I call myself a “regular dad”. I have been married for almost twenty years and have two fantastic daughters that I enjoy coaching in basketball. We are members of a church in Silver Spring. I was born and raised in Montgomery County. I have lived in Dauphin and Cumberland counties for the past 30 years. I try to volunteer as much as time permits for a variety of local charities.
  • During the last two years as Judge on the Commonwealth Court, I have drafted over 125 written decisions. I believe they have been well reasoned and thoughtful. As a judge, it is imperative that I “stay in my lane”. Judges are not to take the powers of the Legislative or Executive branches. I am a strict constructionist that believes my job is to interpret the law in the case before me—nothing more or less. I do not editorialize in my opinions, I simply state the legal facts and issue my determination. Even though most of my judicial service has been via Zoom, I have the right balanced temperament and have shown respect to each lawyer and litigant that has appeared before me.
  • As state above, I have extensive government experience which marries well to the type of issues before the Commonwealth Court. I am proud to have been endorsed by a broad range of organizations including business, labor, law enforcement and educators. Why is that important? These groups have spoken to my acumen and independence as a senate lawyer and now has a Judge. I am also proud to have been recommended by the Pennsylvania Bar Association.
  • People trust their government to a higher degree when they have public access to their government. Last year during the pandemic the Commonwealth Court began live streaming our arguments on YouTube. This should continue even as we return to in person arguments. We must also continue to allow the public wide access to the documents filed by the litigants in each case. Some people are distrustful of judges. I understand that concern and I have done all I am able to do to write clear opinions and make the right decisions for the right reasons. Each and every judge must cast away any bias and call balls and strikes as required under our Constitution. If given a full term by the voters I will continue to do just that.
I enjoy all aspects of state government. I have devoted my career to public service and serving as a Commonwealth Court Judge has been an honor of a lifetime.

I have taught hundreds of high schools students over the past twenty years a seminar on the separation of powers. I am passionate about the Pennsylvania Constitution and the brilliance of our founding authors to delicately give each branch of government very specific duties and responsibilities.

Government functions in an appropriate manner only when the Legislative, Executive and Judicial branches respect each other and do not attempt to have powers not given to it.

As a sitting judge, I have heard cases and disputes between the branches of government and have attempted to ensure that each branch is following the Constitution and state law when it is exercising its powers.

Judges are powerful but that power must also be kept in check. I have told others that I have an important job as a judge, but that does not make me an important person. Judges must show humility and guard the powers of each branch so that the people of Pennsylvanian can trust those elected to make decisions on their behalf.
During my career in the Senate of Pennsylvania, I was required to deal with numerous difficult and stressful situations. A quality I developed over 20 years which has served me well is that I remain very calm during crisis. This has served me well as a judge.

Appearing before a judge can be stressful and often emotional. I work hard to assure the litigants that all will be well and I attempt to maintain a stable disposition. This quality has carried over to dealing with situations not associated with the judiciary as well.
Each judge on the Commonwealth Court should have an extensive knowledge of state government. But that is the professional requirement. There are personal traits that are equally as important.

Judges should be very slow to anger. Judges need to be prepared for every argument. Judges must respect all that appear before him or her.

Some people are losing some trust in the judiciary. And judges must shed all political leanings and be free from bias. The people of Pennsylvania must have judges who are credible and even-handed if we want citizens to trust our judges.
I was in 7th grade when President Reagan was shot. I remember hearing the news during one of my classes. We all scrambled to the nearest tv to hear of the details. It was a day of reflection and fear even for a 12 year old kid.
Like most young people, I held a variety of jobs during high school and college. I was a bus boy at a local nursing home. I was also a waiter at a dining establishment. During college I delivered spas from a wholesaler to distributors.

I held each job for a year or so. These different positions all taught me the value of hard work, being on time and responsibility.

As I went through college and law school, I had the opportunity to intern at a congressman’s office and I spent several years clerking at different law firms in Harrisburg and Philadelphia. My first job after graduation from law school was as a policy lawyer in the Senate of Pennsylvania.

All of these experiences helped me become the lawyer and judge I am today.
I have been a fan of the band Barenaked Ladies for the past 30 years. And don’t blame me for their name, ask them.
I have labeled myself a strict constructionist but labels sometimes mean different things to different people. I believe words matter. Often the primary role of a judge is to interpret the law or regulation. Nothing more and nothing less. Judges should not insert words into a statute that are not there.

I also believe the role of precedent matters. Courts should be very slow to overrule precedent. I believe in rare cases, overruling precedent may be appropriate but these instances should be well explained and seldom. Precedent allows lawyers and individuals the legal consistency that is necessary.
I received the recommendation of the Pennsylvania Bar Association. The bar’s process is rigorous. The application was extensive and there were several in person interviews with the members of the committee.

The bar association stated the following about me: The candidate’s writings are thorough and well-structured. He presented himself to the commission as intelligent, well-spoken and sincere.
I believe I have the particular skill set to be a quality Commonwealth Court Judge. I do not have the experience or expertise to be on the Superior Court because my 26 years as a lawyer was not focused on criminal law.

However for the reasons stated in answers above, I have had experience in all three branches of government and in Pennsylvania, the Commonwealth Court is the government court. All state agencies and local governments appeal their cases to the Commonwealth Court.

I have been told by many others that the Commonwealth Court is well served in light of the knowledge I bring as a judge on this court.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

See also


External links

Footnotes