Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Andrew Thomas (California)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Andrew Thomas
Image of Andrew Thomas

Education

Bachelor's

University of Southern California

Graduate

University of California, Los Angeles

Ph.D

University of California, Los Angeles

Personal
Profession
Educator
Contact

Andrew Thomas was a candidate for the District 5 seat on the Los Angeles Unified School District Board of Education in California. He ran against one incumbent and one challenger in the primary election on March 3, 2015. He did not receive enough votes to advance to the general election held on May 19, 2015.[1][2][3][4]

Biography

Email editor@ballotpedia.org to notify us of updates to this biography.

Thomas grew up in Reno, Nev., but moved to Los Angeles to attend the University of Southern California in 1984. He later went on to earn a doctoral degree in urban schooling from the University of California at Los Angeles' School of Education. His work experience includes setting up computer labs and communications centers for the African National Congress (ANC) in Zimbabwe, helping to get computers and networks into schools and community centers in the U.S. and teaching statistics, research methods and educational policy at Walden University.[5]

Thomas and his wife have two children in high school at the Los Angeles Unified School District. He co-founded Silverlake Independent JCC. At the time of his candidacy, Thomas was serving as the ESC-East at-large representative on the Los Angeles Unified School District Parent Advisory Committee, and he has also served on the school site councils for Franklin Elementary School, King Middle School and Marshall High School.[5]

Elections

2015

See also: Los Angeles Unified School District elections (2015)

Four of the seven seats on the Los Angeles Unified School District Board of Education were up for primary election on March 3, 2015. Only one candidate, unopposed District 1 incumbent George J. McKenna III, received more than 50 percent of the votes cast in the primary. Because of this, he won his seat outright, and the top two vote-getters in Districts 3, 5 and 7 advanced to the general election on May 19, 2015.

Incumbents Tamar Galatzan, Bennett Kayser and Richard A. Vladovic from Districts 3, 5 and 7, respectively, received enough votes to advance to the general election. They each faced at least two challengers in the primary. In District 3, Galatzan faced five challengers, Elizabeth Badger Bartels, Filiberto Gonzalez, Ankur Patel, Carl J. Petersen and Scott Mark Schmerelson. She and Schmerelson faced each other again in the general election. Kayser and challenger Ref Rodriguez defeated challenger Andrew Thomas to continue on to the District 5 general election. In the District 7 primary, Vladovic ran against challengers Euna Anderson and Lydia Gutierrez. Gutierrez received enough votes to advance to the general election with Vladovic.

In the general election, both Galatzan and Kayser were unseated by their challengers. Schmerelson won the District 3 seat, and Rodriguez was elected to the District 5 seat. In District 7, Vladovic defeated Gutierrez to secure another term on the board.

Results

Los Angeles Unified School District,
District 5 Primary Election, 5-year term, 2015
Party Candidate Vote % Votes
     Nonpartisan Green check mark transparent.pngRef Rodriguez 38.6% 10,355
     Nonpartisan Green check mark transparent.pngBennett Kayser Incumbent 35.5% 9,510
     Nonpartisan Andrew Thomas 25.9% 6,946
Total Votes 26,811
Source: Los Angeles City Clerk's Office, "Primary Nominating Election: Official Election Results," accessed March 23, 2015

Funding

Thomas reported $101,508.00 in contributions and $36,715.70 in expenditures to the Los Angeles City Ethics Commission, which left his campaign with $64,792.30 as of February 25, 2015.[6]

Endorsements

Thomas was endorsed by the Los Angeles Times and Los Angeles District 4 Council Member Tom LaBonge. He also received endorsements from a number of community members. A full list of his supporters can be found here.[7][8][9]

Campaign themes

2015

Ballotpedia survey responses

Candidate Connection Logo - stacked.png

Thomas participated in Ballotpedia's 2015 survey of school board candidates. The following sections display his responses to the survey questions. When asked what his top priority would be if elected, the candidate made the following statement:

Focusing on a strategic plan for the implementation of Local Control Funding, common core and smart balanced assessment to achieve our goals of graduation and proficiency for all students.[10]
—Andrew Thomas (2015)[11]
Ranking the issues

The candidate was asked to rank the following issues by importance in the school district, with 1 being the most important and 7 being the least important. This table displays this candidate's rankings from most to least important:

Education policy
Education Policy Logo on Ballotpedia.png

Click here to learn more about education policy in California.
Education on the ballot
Issue importance ranking
Candidate's ranking Issue
1
Expanding school choice options
2
Balancing or maintaining the district's budget
3
Expanding arts education
4
Expanding career-technical education
5
Improving college readiness
6
Improving education for special needs students
7
Closing the achievement gap
Positions on the issues

The candidate was asked to answer 10 questions from Ballotpedia regarding significant issues in education and the school district. The questions are in the left column, and the candidate's responses are in the right column of the following table:

Question Response
What is your stance on implementing Common Core standards?
"They should be implemented, but modifications are required, not in the standards, but in the curricula and testing programs associated with them. More professional development is needed."
Should your district approve the creation of new charter schools?
"All candidates agree that no new charters in Los Angeles"
Should the state give money to private schools through a voucher system?
"No"
Are standardized tests an accurate metric of student achievement?
"Yes"
How can the district ensure equal opportunities for high and low achieving students?
"More resources should be spent on low achieving, low-income schools that have high needs."
How should expulsion be used in the district?
"Practices such as positive behavior strategies should be used before expulsion is considered."
If a school is failing in your district, what steps should the school board take to help the students in that school?
"Make sure there are high quality administrators and teachers. High need schools should have school psychologists and/or counselors as appropriate. There may be mental and physical health needs as well. Basically, it should be all-hands-on deck for the highest needs schools."
Do you support merit pay for teachers?
"No"
How should the district handle underperforming teachers?
"A, B & C. Teachers should be terminated if they don’t improve after receiving coaching and additional supports, or if they commit egregious acts."*
How would you work to improve community-school board relations?
"Create a school liaison officer program, create relations between the school board member's office and neighborhood councils and other community groups."
*Note: The "A, B & C" options Thomas referred to were the following: A: Set up a mentorship program for the underperforming teacher with a more experienced teacher in the district, B: Offer additional training options and C: Put underperforming teachers on a probationary period while they seek to improve.

Candidate website

Thomas highlighted the following issues on his campaign website:

Our School Board is in a crisis of leadership.

In just the last few years our schools have been subjected to an embarrassingly blundered and expensive rollout of the new scheduling software (MiSiS) that resulted in thousands of students being forced to waste up to six weeks of instructional time, and has cost the taxpayers $100 million more than expected. The schools have also endured a poorly planned integration of iPads into the classroom, costing $130 million so far and resulting in an investigation by the FBI.

It does not take long to see that the school board is in desperate need of new leadership.

It is a critical time for the district--a new superintendent needs to be hired, new standards need to be taught, and new tests need to be rolled out--all under the shadow of a looming $300 million deficit. The top-down, closed door decision making of this board has resulted in waste, ineffectiveness and worse. Our children cannot afford another term of the games the board plays with their education.

Andrew Thomas is running to give the communities of District 5 a real advocate on the Board of Education. How long will we tolerate the Board’s habit of ignoring parents and operating behind closed doors? These games have already cost generations of graduating classes the high quality education they deserve. It’s time we put this to a stop!

If elected, Andrew will begin giving control back to the community by:

  • Reinvigorating the Field Representative program to connect board members to their constituencies and give schools and parents a real voice.
  • Restructuring the budgeting process to a “zero-based” model to prevent cronyism and to guarantee that educational needs are addressed. Under the current budgeting model, approval is only required for changes to the baseline budget, which means that problematic spending can be carried over from year to year. In the zero-based budgeting model, every line item of the budget must be approved or re-approved.
  • Supporting teachers by establishing high expectations for student achievement that are measured by more than just tests, and giving schools the resources they need to exceed those standards.[10]
—Andrew Thomas' campaign website (2015)[12]

Recent news

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Andrew Thomas Los Angeles Unified School District. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

See also

External links

Footnotes