Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

Andrew Whitman recall, Ojai, California (2023)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Andrew Whitman recall
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge.png
Officeholders
Andrew Whitman
Recall status
Did not go to a vote
Signature requirement
332 signatures
See also
Recall overview
Political recall efforts, 2023
Recalls in California
California recall laws
City council recalls
Recall reports

An effort to recall District 3 City Councilman Andrew Whitman did not go to a vote in Ojai, California. The Ojai City Clerk's Office rejected the initial notice of intent to circulate the recall petition. Organizers served Whitman with a new notice on October 2, 2023.[1][2][3][4]

Recall supporters

The grounds for the proposed recall listed on the notice of intent were as follows:

Andrew Whitman did a "bait and switch" on District 3 residents. As one constituent told the City Council, Whitman promised to "work productively" with colleagues. But things turned out very differently: "I now see you as an arrogant, disingenuous, petty bully. I am sorry I voted for you."

That regret is common.

Utilizing vulgarity, Whitman intimidated, belittled and insulted two colleagues, Councilwomen Suza Francina and Leslie Rule.

He connived with Mayor Stix to ignore the public good by promoting the narrow views of Simply Ojai. He concealed wrongdoings during closed-door meetings that the Ventura District Attorney determined violated the Brown Act, then supported reversing the Council's commitment to cease and desist from violating that law.

Stifling dissent, Whitman voted to move public comments to the end of council meetings (11 pm); and attempted to remove Councilwoman Francina after she became houseless.

Whitman failed to exert any leadership in solving the district's septic watershed contamination. He falsely smeared an effective planning commissioner to remove him simply out of political revenge.

His intolerance of opposing opinions endangers the free speech rights of all and could cost Ojai thousands in litigation.

Whitman is unfit for office and must be recalled.[5]

Ojai resident Barbara Bowman is organizing the recall effort.[2]

Recall opponents

In Whitman's written response to the recall petition, he wrote, “It is nothing more than an attempt to reverse a fair election.”[6]

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing recall in California

A notice of intention to circulate a recall petition was served to Whitman on August 29, 2023. The notice of intention is the first step in the recall process in California. After the notice of intention was filed, Whitman had seven days to file a response.[1][7]

In a September 12, 2023, letter addressed to Bowman, Ojai City Clerk said, “This letter shall serve as the formal rejection and return of your Notice of Intent to Circulate Recall petition because your Notice of Intent did not meet the statutory requirements."[2]

Recall organizers served Whitman with a new notice of intent to recall on October 2, 2023.[3]

In California, the percentage of registered voters whose signatures are needed to trigger a recall election for a local official depends on the number of registered voters in the jurisdiction:

  • 30% in jurisdictions with 0 - 1,000 registered voters
  • 25% in jurisdictions with 1,000 - 10,000 registered voters
  • 20% in jurisdictions with 10,000 - 50,000 registered voters
  • 15% in jurisdictions with 50,000 - 100,000 registered voters
  • 10% in jurisdictions with 100,000 or more registered voters

Recall organizers submitted 347 signatures, of which 309 were found to be sufficient. The recall effort did not move forward.[4]

See also

External links

Footnotes