Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Arizona Proposition 121, Top-Two Primary Elections Initiative (2012)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Arizona Proposition 121

Flag of Arizona.png

Election date

November 6, 2012

Topic
Primary election systems
Status

DefeatedDefeated

Type
Initiated constitutional amendment
Origin

Citizens



Arizona Proposition 121 was on the ballot as an initiated constitutional amendment in Arizona on November 6, 2012. It was defeated.

A "yes" vote supported this constitutional amendment to replace the party primary election system with a top-two primary election system in which all candidates regardless of party affiliation run in the same primary and the two candidates who receive the most votes proceed to the general election.

A "no" vote opposed this constitutional amendment to replace the party primary election system with a top-two primary election system.


Election results

Arizona Proposition 121

Result Votes Percentage
Yes 662,366 33.07%

Defeated No

1,340,286 66.93%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Proposition 121 was as follows:

CREATING AN OPEN PRIMARY GIVING ALL QUALIFIED VOTERS THE RIGHT TO VOTE FOR THE CANDIDATES OF THEIR CHOICE, PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA; AMENDING ARTICLE VII OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA RELATING TO DIRECT PRIMARY ELECTION LAW.

Ballot summary

The ballot summary for this measure was:

REPLACES THE CURRENT PARTY PRIMARY ELECTION WITH A "TOP-TWO" PRIMARY ELECTION IN WHICH ALL VOTERS, REGARDLESS OF PARTY AFFILIATION, VOTE IN A SINGLE, COMBINED PRIMARY AND THE TOP TWO VOTER-GETTERS FOR EACH SEAT ADVANCE TO THE GENERAL ELECTION BALLOT.

Full Text

The full text of this measure is available here.


Constitutional changes

See also: Article 7, Arizona Constitution

The ballot measure would have repealed and replaced Section 10 of Article 7 of the Arizona Constitution.[1]

Support

Arguments

  • Paul Johnson, Chairman of the Open Government Committee: "Under the existing taxpayer-funded partisan primaries, small minorities of voters select candidates who often represent the ideological extremes of the parties. Under the current system, Independent voters, who are the fastest growing category of voters in Arizona and the U.S., have little or no role in the process. … Allowing every voter the right to vote in every election will result in elected officials who have to be accessible to all voters not just the powerful few. It will encourage elected officials to be more respectful and listen to views of others for the public good."
  • Carolyn Allen, Vice-Chair of the Grand Canyon Institute, and Jack August, Secretary of the Grand Canyon Institute: “The Open Election Open Government Act, while not a panacea, allows every voter the right to vote in every election. Winning politicians, instead of addressing narrow ideological groups inside partisan primaries, will be required to talk to people in the other party as well as independents. This should moderate Arizona’s politics.”
  • Bill Whitaker, Chairman of Arizona’s Fire Fighters: “This simple change will reduce the influence of political parties and lobbyists, meanwhile encouraging more independent, solution-minded candidates to seek office. Proposition 121 will empower voters, giving us more and better choices and a louder voice in the election process. No more will partisan primaries - paid for by taxpayers and dominated by handpicked candidates from one party - cater to a small group of voters who pick a winner while shutting out independents and the rest of us.”


Opposition

Arguments

  • Gov. Jan Brewer (R): “This measure is an arrack on Arizona’s political parties and an attack on our election process itself. Most disturbing, it threatens to create new opportunities for ‘sham’ candidates whose sole purpose is to mislead voters and fraudulently impact the outcome of Arizona elections. This is not ‘open elections, open government’ at all. Proposition 121 may have a ‘catchy’ title, but it will usher in a selection process that threatens the voice of Arizona voters.”
  • Barbara Klein, President, and Robyn Prud’homme-Bauer, First Vice President of the League of Women Voters of Arizona: “The ‘spoiler effect’ remains. Supporters claim having only two candidates advance to the general election ensures a majority vote without spoiler effect from third candidates. However, as the California election just showed, ‘spoiler effect’ in the primary would be alive and well - and devastating. There are solutions to election structure in Arizona. Just not this!”
  • State Rep. Debbie Lesko (R): “This initiative could prevent whole blocks of voters from voting for someone from their own party in the general election. Many legislative districts are heavy Republican or Democrat leaning. In a heavy Republican-dominant district it is likely a registered Democrat wouldn’t even make it to the General election. Conversely, a registered Republican likely won’t make it to the General election in a Democrat-dominant district, leaving thousands of voters with no one from their party to vote for in the general election.”


Background

See also: Electoral systems on the ballot

The following is a list of statewide ballot measures to enact top-two primaries:

State Year Type Title Result Yes Votes No Votes
FL 2020

CICA

Amendment 3

Defeated

5,854,468 (57%)

4,410,768 (43%)

AZ 2012

CICA

Proposition 121

Defeated

662,366 (33%)

1,340,286 (67%)

CA 2010

LRCA

Proposition 14

Approveda

2,868,945 (54%)

2,470,658 (46%)

OR 2008

CISS

Measure 65

Defeated

553,640 (34%)

1,070,580 (66%)

CA 2004

CICA/SS

Proposition 62

Defeated

5,119,155 (46%)

5,968,770 (54%)

WA 2004

CISS

Initiative 872

Approveda

1,632,225 (60%)

1,095,190 (40%)


Path to the ballot

See also: Signature requirements for ballot measures in Arizona

In Arizona, the number of signatures required for an initiated constitutional amendment is equal to 15 percent of the votes cast at the preceding gubernatorial election.

See also


External links

Footnotes