Arizona Proposition 121, Top-Two Primary Elections Initiative (2012)
Arizona Proposition 121 | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic Primary election systems |
|
Status |
|
Type Initiated constitutional amendment |
Origin |
Arizona Proposition 121 was on the ballot as an initiated constitutional amendment in Arizona on November 6, 2012. It was defeated.
A "yes" vote supported this constitutional amendment to replace the party primary election system with a top-two primary election system in which all candidates regardless of party affiliation run in the same primary and the two candidates who receive the most votes proceed to the general election. |
A "no" vote opposed this constitutional amendment to replace the party primary election system with a top-two primary election system. |
Election results
Arizona Proposition 121 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
Yes | 662,366 | 33.07% | ||
1,340,286 | 66.93% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Proposition 121 was as follows:
“ | CREATING AN OPEN PRIMARY GIVING ALL QUALIFIED VOTERS THE RIGHT TO VOTE FOR THE CANDIDATES OF THEIR CHOICE, PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA; AMENDING ARTICLE VII OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA RELATING TO DIRECT PRIMARY ELECTION LAW. | ” |
Ballot summary
The ballot summary for this measure was:
“ | REPLACES THE CURRENT PARTY PRIMARY ELECTION WITH A "TOP-TWO" PRIMARY ELECTION IN WHICH ALL VOTERS, REGARDLESS OF PARTY AFFILIATION, VOTE IN A SINGLE, COMBINED PRIMARY AND THE TOP TWO VOTER-GETTERS FOR EACH SEAT ADVANCE TO THE GENERAL ELECTION BALLOT. | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Constitutional changes
- See also: Article 7, Arizona Constitution
The ballot measure would have repealed and replaced Section 10 of Article 7 of the Arizona Constitution.[1]
Support
Arguments
Opposition
Arguments
Background
- See also: Electoral systems on the ballot
The following is a list of statewide ballot measures to enact top-two primaries:
State | Year | Type | Title | Result | Yes Votes | No Votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FL | 2020 | Amendment 3 |
|
5,854,468 (57%) |
4,410,768 (43%) |
|
AZ | 2012 | Proposition 121 |
|
662,366 (33%) |
1,340,286 (67%) |
|
CA | 2010 | Proposition 14 |
|
2,868,945 (54%) |
2,470,658 (46%) |
|
OR | 2008 | Measure 65 |
|
553,640 (34%) |
1,070,580 (66%) |
|
CA | 2004 | Proposition 62 |
|
5,119,155 (46%) |
5,968,770 (54%) |
|
WA | 2004 | Initiative 872 |
|
1,632,225 (60%) |
1,095,190 (40%) |
Path to the ballot
In Arizona, the number of signatures required for an initiated constitutional amendment is equal to 15 percent of the votes cast at the preceding gubernatorial election.
See also
External links
Footnotes
![]() |
State of Arizona Phoenix (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |