Arizona Court of Appeals
The Arizona Court of Appeals was established in 1965 and is the intermediate appellate court for the state. It is divided into two divisions, with a total of 22 judges on the court. There are 16 judges for Division One, based in Phoenix, and six for Division Two, based in Tucson.[1][2]
The court decides the cases that come before it in panels of three judges. These panels are called departments. Each three-judge department has a presiding judge who is elected by the three judges of that department. The court hears appeals of civil and criminal cases from the superior courts, except when a death sentence has been imposed. If the superior court imposes a death sentence, the case is always appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court. The court of appeals reviews cases involving juveniles and domestic relations, workers' compensation and unemployment benefits, taxes and some corporation decisions. Finally, it may decide "petitions for special action", or petitions for special writs such as certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.[3]
When litigants disagree with a ruling of this court, they can file an appeal with the Arizona Supreme Court.[4]
| Arizona Court of Appeals | |||
| Court information | |||
| Judges: | 22 | ||
| Founded: | 1965 | ||
| Salary: | $150,000[5] | ||
| Judicial selection | |||
| Method: | Assisted appointment | ||
| Term: | 6 years | ||
Contents
Judges
| Judge | Tenure | Appointed By |
|---|---|---|
|
2006 - Present |
Gov. Janet Napolitano (D) |
|
|
2017 - Present |
Gov. Doug Ducey (R) |
|
|
November 1, 2019 - Present |
Gov. Doug Ducey (R) |
|
|
2017 - Present |
Gov. Doug Ducey (R) |
|
|
2007 - Present |
Gov. Janet Napolitano (D) |
|
|
2017 - Present |
Gov. Doug Ducey (R) |
|
|
December 30, 2020 - Present |
Doug Ducey |
|
|
April 24, 2020 - Present |
Gov. Doug Ducey (R) |
|
|
2017 - Present |
Gov. Doug Ducey (R) |
|
|
September 23, 2008 - Present |
Gov. Janet Napolitano (D) |
|
|
February 8, 2013 - Present |
Gov. Jan Brewer (R) |
|
|
2002 - Present |
Gov. Jane Dee Hull (R) |
|
|
2012 - Present |
Gov. Jan Brewer (R) |
|
|
2018 - Present |
Gov. Doug Ducey (R) |
|
|
2012 - Present |
Gov. Jan Brewer (R) |
|
|
2016 - Present |
Gov. Doug Ducey (R) |
|
|
2017 - Present |
Gov. Doug Ducey (R) |
|
|
2019 - Present |
Gov. Doug Ducey (R) |
|
|
2017 - Present |
Gov. Doug Ducey (R) |
|
|
2003 - Present |
Gov. Janet Napolitano (D) |
|
|
October 20, 2015 - Present |
Gov. Doug Ducey (R) |
|
|
1992 - Present |
Gov. Fife Symington (R) |
Judicial selection
Judges are selected by the commission/appointment method. The Arizona Commission on Appellate Court Appointments interviews applicants and sends a list of nominees to the governor. The governor is required by law to appoint from this list based on merit, without regard to party affiliation. Court of appeals judges serve initial terms of at least two years and subsequent terms of six years.[6] The court of appeals is divided into two divisions. There are 16 judges for Division One, based in Phoenix, and six for Division Two, based in Tucson. In Division One, 10 judges must be residents of Maricopa County, five judges must be residents of the remaining counties, and the final judge may be a resident of any county in Division One. In Division Two, four judges must be residents of Pima County and two judges must be residents of the remaining counties.[1][7][8]
The chief judge of the court of appeals, like that of the supreme court, is selected by peer vote. However, he or she only serves in that capacity for one year.[6]
Qualifications
To be qualified to serve on the Court of Appeals bench, a judge must be:
- at least 30 years old
- of good moral character
- a resident of Arizona who has been licensed to practice law in the state for the five years immediately prior to taking office[1]
Salary
According to a study published by the National Center for State Courts, the annual salary for Arizona Court of Appeals judges is $150,000. These judges are the 26th highest paid intermediate appellate judges in the nation. These figures were accurate as of January 1, 2015.[9]
Elections
2020
The terms of 11 Arizona Court of Appeals justices expired on January 4, 2021. The 11 seats were up for retention election on November 3, 2020. A full term on the court is six years.
Judges with expiring terms
- This is a list of the justices who had to stand for retention election in 2020 in order to remain on the bench. Justices could choose not to stand for election.
■ Samuel A. Thumma
■ Jennifer B. Campbell
■ Maria Elena Cruz
■ Randall M. Howe
■ Paul McMurdie
■ James Morse
■ Jennifer Perkins
■ David Weinzweig
■ Garye Vasquez
■ Karl Eppich
■ Sean Brearcliffe
Division One
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One - Retention elections (November 3, 2020) | |
|
|
| Office | Candidates |
| Division One |
|
| Division One |
|
| Division One |
|
| Division One |
|
| Division One |
|
| Division One |
|
| Division One |
|
| Division One |
|
Division Two
Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two - Retention elections (November 3, 2020) | |
|
|
| Office | Candidates |
| Division Two |
|
| Division Two |
|
| Division Two |
|
2018
- See also: Arizona judicial elections, 2018
Judges with expiring terms
- This is a list of the judges who had to stand for retention in 2018 in order to remain on the bench. Judges may choose not to stand for retention or may retire. In retention elections, a judge stands for a "yes" or "no" vote; no challengers may run in the elections.
■ Philip Espinosa ![]()
■ Peter Eckerstrom ![]()
■ Peter Swann ![]()
■ Christopher P. Staring ![]()
2016
Judges who faced retention
■ Jon Thompson ![]()
■ Kent Cattani ![]()
■ Lawrence Winthrop ![]()
■ Michael J. Brown ![]()
■ Kenton Jones ![]()
■ Michael O. Miller ![]()
Election results
November 8 general election
Jon Thompson was retained in the Arizona Court of Appeals, Thompson's seat election with 79.02% of the vote.| Arizona Court of Appeals, Thompson's seat, 2016 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Name | Yes votes | |
| 79.02% | ||
| Source: Arizona Secretary of State | ||
| Arizona Court of Appeals, Cattani's seat, 2016 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Name | Yes votes | |
| 72.06% | ||
| Source: Arizona Secretary of State | ||
| Arizona Court of Appeals, Winthrop's seat, 2016 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Name | Yes votes | |
| 72.53% | ||
| Source: Arizona Secretary of State | ||
| Arizona Court of Appeals, Brown's seat, 2016 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Name | Yes votes | |
| 79.24% | ||
| Source: Arizona Secretary of State | ||
| Arizona Court of Appeals, Jones' seat, 2016 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Name | Yes votes | |
| 79.27% | ||
| Source: Arizona Secretary of State | ||
| Arizona Court of Appeals, Miller's seat, 2016 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Name | Yes votes | |
| 78.18% | ||
| Source: Arizona Secretary of State | ||
2014
Retention| Judge | Election Vote |
|---|---|
| Diane Johnsen | 66.7% |
| Andrew W. Gould | 77.5% |
| Randall M. Howe | 71.7% |
| Samuel A. Thumma | 68.1% |
| Patricia Orozco | 75.1% |
| Garye Vasquez | 70.4% |
2012
| Judge | Incumbency | Retention vote | Retention Vote % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donn Kessler | Yes | 477,974 | 66.68% |
| Joseph W. Howard | Yes | 121,064 | 76.59% |
| Margaret Downie | Yes | 512,260 | 70.06% |
| Maurice Portley | Yes | 452,943 | 63.13% |
| Patricia Norris | Yes | 507,557 | 69.63% |
| Peter Eckerstrom | Yes | 188,495 | 72.78% |
| Peter Swann | Yes | 463,787 | 64.67% |
| Philip Espinosa | Yes | 194,653 | 75.64% |
| Virginia C. Kelly | Yes | 199,865 | 77.51% |
Ethics
The judges in Arizona must follow the state's judicial code of conduct. It has four canons.
| “ |
|
” |
| —Arizona judiciary[11] | ||
Removal of judges
In Arizona, there are three ways to remove a judge from the bench.
- Judges may be impeached by a majority vote of the Arizona House of Representatives. The judge must then be convicted by a two-thirds vote of the Arizona Senate.
- The Arizona Supreme Court may take action to censure, suspend, remove or forcibly retire a judge upon the recommendation of the Commission on Judicial Conduct.
Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct
This commission receives and investigates complaints of judicial misconduct or wrongdoing. It then makes a recommendation, if appropriate, to the Supreme Court on discipline for the judge. The commission also answers ethical questions as they arise from judges and their staff.[13]
*For a more detailed look at this commission, please see the Commission on Judicial Conduct page.
Noteworthy cases
| • Arizona Court of Appeals rules marijuana users can get DUI even if not impaired (2013) Judge(s):Michael J. Brown (State ex rel. Montgomery v. Harris, No. 1 CA–SA 12–0211) | Click for summary→ |
|---|---|
|
The Arizona Court of Appeals' ruling on February 13, 2013, focused on two chemical compounds found in blood and urine of marijuana users. One compound impairs a driver's senses, while the second compound does not. The second compound, while not impairing the user, still stays in a person's system up to weeks after smoking and is detectable in a blood/urine test. The court of appeals ruled that Arizona law applies to both chemical compounds and that a person can be prosecuted for driving under the influence if marijuana is detectable in their system, even if the person is not actually impaired. This decision overturned the lower court's ruling that prosecuting someone for being under the influence when there was no evidence of impairment was senseless.[14] The Arizona Supreme Court reviewed the court of appeals' decision and affirmed it in an opinion issued April 22, 2014.[15] | |
| • Court orders sheriff to return confiscated marijuana (2013) Judge(s):Diane Johnsen (State v. Okun, No. 1 CA–CV 12–0094) | Click for summary→ |
|---|---|
|
Marijuana confiscated from a California woman was returned after the Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed an earlier ruling by a superior court.[16][17] The marijuana was confiscated at a border checkpoint and the woman was cited for violating Arizona's drug laws. Those charges were dropped after she presented proof of her authorization to use and possess medical marijuana in California, and under Arizona’s 2010 voter-approved medical marijuana law, she was permitted to possess two and a half ounces as a visitor in Arizona. The Yuma County Superior Court ordered the medical marijuana returned, but the sheriff argued that doing so would violate federal drug distribution laws.[16][17] Affirming the superior court's decision, the Arizona Court of Appeals ordered that the marijuana be returned because it should never have been confiscated. The court also stated that "the Sheriff is immune from prosecution under the federal law for acts taken in compliance with a court order."[16][17] | |
State profile
| Demographic data for Arizona | ||
|---|---|---|
| Arizona | U.S. | |
| Total population: | 6,817,565 | 316,515,021 |
| Land area (sq mi): | 113,594 | 3,531,905 |
| Race and ethnicity** | ||
| White: | 78.4% | 73.6% |
| Black/African American: | 4.2% | 12.6% |
| Asian: | 3% | 5.1% |
| Native American: | 4.4% | 0.8% |
| Pacific Islander: | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Two or more: | 3.2% | 3% |
| Hispanic/Latino: | 30.3% | 17.1% |
| Education | ||
| High school graduation rate: | 86% | 86.7% |
| College graduation rate: | 27.5% | 29.8% |
| Income | ||
| Median household income: | $50,255 | $53,889 |
| Persons below poverty level: | 21.2% | 11.3% |
| Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "American Community Survey" (5-year estimates 2010-2015) Click here for more information on the 2020 census and here for more on its impact on the redistricting process in Arizona. **Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here. | ||
Presidential voting pattern
- See also: Presidential voting trends in Arizona
Arizona voted Republican in all five presidential elections between 2000 and 2016.
More Arizona coverage on Ballotpedia
- Elections in Arizona
- United States congressional delegations from Arizona
- Public policy in Arizona
- Influencers in Arizona
- Arizona fact checks
- More...
Recent news
The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Arizona Court of Appeals. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.
See also
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Arizona Courts, "Court of Appeals," accessed May 8, 2015
- ↑ Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two, "Court Information," accessed September 22, 2015
- ↑ Arizona Secretary of State, "Court of Appeals," accessed February 12, 2015
- ↑ Azcourts.gov, "Court of Appeals," accessed July 7, 2014
- ↑ This may vary for the chief judge.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedgen - ↑ Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two, "Court Information," accessed September 22, 2015
- ↑ Arizona Revised Statutes, "Title 12, Chapter 1, Section 12-120.02 - Election of judges," accessed October 6, 2020
- ↑ National Center for State Courts, "Survey of Judicial Salaries," January 1, 2015
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Arizona Courts, "Arizona Code of Judicial Conduct (2014)," accessed May 8, 2015
- ↑ National Center for State Courts, "Removal of Judges in Alabama," accessed May 8, 2015
- ↑ Arizona Courts, "Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct," accessed May 8, 2015
- ↑ AZ Central.com, "Arizona court ruling upholds DUI test for marijuana," February 13, 2013
- ↑ Findlaw.com, "State Montgomery v. Harris," April 22, 2014
- ↑ 16.0 16.1 16.2 The Daily Chronic, "Arizona court orders sheriff to return medical marijuana to California woman," January 12, 2013
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 17.2 The Republic, "Ariz. court orders county sheriff to return pot to California woman," January 10, 2013
Federal courts:
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals • U.S. District Court: District of Arizona • U.S. Bankruptcy Court: District of Arizona
State courts:
Arizona Supreme Court • Arizona Court of Appeals • Arizona Superior Court • Arizona Justice Courts • Arizona Municipal Courts
State resources:
Courts in Arizona • Arizona judicial elections • Judicial selection in Arizona
| |||||||