Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

Arizona Proposition 109, Right to Hunt and Fish Amendment (2010)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Arizona Proposition 109

Flag of Arizona.png

Election date

November 2, 2010

Topic
Constitutional rights and Right to hunt and fish
Status

DefeatedDefeated

Type
Legislatively referred constitutional amendment
Origin

State legislature



Arizona Proposition 109 was on the ballot as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment in Arizona on November 2, 2010. It was defeated.

A "yes" vote supported the right to lawfully hunt, fish, and harvest wildlife and grant the legislature exclusive authority to regulate such activity.

A "no" vote opposed the right to lawfully hunt, fish, and harvest wildlife and grant the legislature exclusive authority to regulate such activity.


Election results

Arizona Proposition 109

Result Votes Percentage
Yes 714,144 43.52%

Defeated No

926,991 56.48%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Proposition 109 was as follows:

PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA; AMENDING ARTICLE II, CONSTITUITON OF ARIZONA, BY ADDING SECTION 36; RELATING TO HUNTING AND FISHING.

Ballot summary

The ballot summary for this measure was:

ESTABLISHES THE RIGHT OF ARIZONA CITIZENS TO HUNT, FISH AND HARVEST WILDLIFE LAWFULLY; GRANTS EXCLUSIVE AUTHORITY TO THE LEGISLATURE TO REGULATE HUNTING, FISHING AND HARVESTING WILDLIFE; PROHIBITS LAWS THAT UNREASONABLY RESTRICT HUNTING, FISHING AND HARVESTING WILDLIFE; ESTABLISHES LAWFUL HUNTING AND FISHING AS A PREFERRED MEANS OF MANAGING AND CONTROLLING WILDLIFE.

Full Text

The full text of this measure is available here.


Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Arizona Constitution

A simple majority vote was needed in each chamber of the Arizona State Legislature to refer the constitutional amendment to the ballot for voter consideration.

See also


External links

Footnotes