Arizona Proposition 100, Appellate and Trial Court Appointments Amendment (1976)
| Arizona Proposition 100 | |
|---|---|
| Election date |
|
| Topic Administration of government and State judiciary |
|
| Status |
|
| Type Legislatively referred constitutional amendment |
Origin |
Arizona Proposition 100 was on the ballot as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment in Arizona on November 2, 1976. It was approved.
A "yes" vote supported requiring the advice and consent of the Senate on certain appellate and trial court appointments made by the governor. |
A "no" vote opposed requiring the advice and consent of the Senate on certain appellate and trial court appointments made by the governor. |
Election results
|
Arizona Proposition 100 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| 368,505 | 65.94% | |||
| No | 190,326 | 34.06% | ||
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Proposition 100 was as follows:
| “ | A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION PROPOSING AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA RELATING TO APPOINTMENTS TO CERTAIN PUBLIC OFFICES; PROVIDING THAT CERTAIN APPOINTMENTS SHALL BE MADE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW; AMENDING ARTICLE 6, SECTION 36, CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA; AMENDING ARTICLE 6.1, SECTION 1, CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA; AMENDING ARTICLE 11, SECTIONS 3 AND 5, CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA, AND AMENDING ARTICLE 15, SECTION 5, CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA. | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Path to the ballot
- See also: Amending the Arizona Constitution
A simple majority vote was needed in each chamber of the Arizona State Legislature to refer the constitutional amendment to the ballot for voter consideration.
See also
External links
Footnotes
State of Arizona Phoenix (capital) | |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |