Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

Arizona Proposition 310, Sales Tax for Fire District Funding Measure (2022)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Arizona Proposition 310
Flag of Arizona.png
Election date
November 8, 2022
Topic
Taxes
Status
Defeatedd Defeated
Type
State statute
Origin
State legislature

Arizona Proposition 310, the Sales Tax for Fire District Funding Measure, was on the ballot in Arizona as a legislatively referred state statute on November 8, 2022. This measure was defeated.

A "yes" vote supported creating a 0.1% sales tax for 20 years to provide funding for the state's fire districts.

A "no" vote opposed creating a 0.1% sales tax for 20 years to provide funding for the state's fire districts.


Election results

Arizona Proposition 310

Result Votes Percentage
Yes 1,144,495 48.20%

Defeated No

1,230,042 51.80%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

How would revenue from the proposed sales tax have been used?

Proposition 310 was designed to enact a 0.1% sales tax for 20 years — January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2042 — and deposit revenue from the tax into a Fire District Safety Fund.[1]

The Arizona State Treasurer would have been required to distribute revenue from the Fire District Safety Fund to individual fire districts at the end of each month.[1]

Proposition 310 would have provided a formula for distributing funds each month: first, in proportion to each district's total property value (but not more than 3% of the total distribution); second, for those districts that received less than 3% in the first distribution, the first step would repeat; and third, any remaining revenue would be distributed equally between the districts.[1]

What is a fire district in Arizona?

See also: Fire districts in Arizona

In Arizona, a fire district is a special taxing district with an elected three- or five-person board. Districts are political subdivisions that are independent of local governments. These are different from fire departments, which are part of a municipal government. Districts receive property tax revenue to hire employees and purchase equipment, land, and buildings to provide fire protection-related and paramedic services.[2][3][4]

Text of measure

Ballot title

The official ballot title was as follows:[1]

Proposition 310
Referred to the people by the legislature relating to taxation benefitting fire districts


Official Title

Amending Title 42, Chapter 5, Article 1, Arizona revised statutes, by adding section 42-5010.02; amending Section 42-5155, Arizona revised statutes; amending Title 48, Chapter 5, Article 1, Arizona revised statutes, by adding section 48-825; relating to taxation benefitting fire districts.

Descriptive Title

The law would establish a fire district safety fund to be funded via an increase of one-tenth of one percent to the state’s transaction privilege (sales) and use tax from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2042. [5]

Ballot summary

The official ballot summary was as follows:[1]

A “YES” vote shall have the effect of establishing a Fire District Safety Fund; increasing the Transaction Privilege (Sales) and Use Tax by onetenth of one percent from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2042 to pay for the Fund; and distributing monies from the Fund to fire districts on a monthly basis.

A “NO” vote shall have the effect of retaining existing law on tax rates and funding for fire districts. [5]

Full text

The full text of the ballot measure was as follows:[1]

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2022

Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.

The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 12, and the FRE is 26. The word count for the ballot title is 83.

The FKGL for the ballot summary is grade level 11, and the FRE is 56. The word count for the ballot summary is 68.


Support

Arizonans for Public Safety Yes on 310 was the campaign in support of the measure.

Supporters

Officials

Political Parties

  • Pima County Democratic Party

Organizations

  • Civic Engagement Beyond Voting

Arguments

  • Will Humble, executive director for the Arizona Public Health Association: “Not every single one of them, but almost all the rural fire districts that do emergency medical services are badly underfunded. A lot of times it’s just volunteers. Their equipment is old, nonfunctional or nonexistent.”
  • State Sen. Paul Boyer (R-20): "Arizona’s 144 fire districts are in the midst of a serious, but largely unknown crisis — a shortage of manpower, equipment and resources our state can and should address to keep residents and visitors safe. ... SCR 1049 will give Arizona voters the opportunity to solve this crisis with a single vote. It will allow us to tangibly improve public safety with minimal impact to household budgets. And it will help fire districts — largely ignored by the federal government when it came to pandemic relief funding — a way to cope with the surging fuel costs, higher equipment costs, and higher insurance costs brought on by COVID-19 and inflation. In fact, this future ballot proposition may very well have a greater impact on saving people’s lives than anything else the Legislature has done during the entire 2022 legislative session."
  • Don Jongewaard, Executive Vice President of the Professional Fire Fighters of Arizona: "This temporary tenth-of-a-penny increase in the state’s sales tax will generate about $150 million annually for the state’s fire districts. These increased resources will take the pressure off our fire fighters and paramedics, and help ensure they have the equipment and training they need to provide fire, emergency and medical services to residents and travelers. As most of you already know, many of the state’s fire districts are strapped for funding and short of manpower, equipment and training."
  • Patrick Moore, president of the Arizona Fire District Association: "Arizona’s Firefighters and the Fire Districts that provide fire and emergency medical services need your help. The firefighters are battling to maintain staffing levels at an safe and acceptable level. Staffing levels directly impact our firefighters ability to safely and effectively respond to medical emergency, motor vehicle collisions, house fires and wilfdfires throughout our State. In most fire districts the number of firefighters on duty in 2022 is considerably less than our staffing levels in 2008. This 1/tenth-of-a-penny increase in the state’s sales tax will generate approximately $150 million annually for the state’s fire districts. The Prop 310 funding will help ensure firefighters and emergency responders have the equipment and training needed to provide the basic fire, emergency and medical services to our residents and travelers. Simply put, firefighters will be able to answer the call for help throughout our State."


Opposition

Opponents

Political Parties

Organizations


Arguments

  • Arizona Free Enterprise Club: "If enacted, all Arizona taxpayers would be forced to subsidize 1.5 million other Arizona taxpayers despite already paying taxes for fire and emergency services in their own communities. This is not only redistributive, but it’s unfair. And that’s not the only problem. This policy is essentially a bailout for fire districts who have recklessly and wastefully spent taxpayer money. Having Arizona’s taxpayers indiscriminately subsidize districts that are not good stewards of taxpayer money is a perverse incentive."
  • Aimee Yentes, vice president of Government Affairs, Arizona Free Enterprise Club: "To the average voter, this may not sound like a big deal. After all, firefighters provide an important service that keep people and their property safe. But this is terrible policy that would set a horrible precedent. Prop 310 would force Arizona taxpayers who already pay for city fire and EMS services to subsidize 1.5 million other Arizona taxpayers in the state. This is redistributive and unfair. Additionally, Prop 310 is a bailout for fire districts who have irresponsibly spent taxpayer money. Forcing responsible districts to subsidize the few irresponsible districts creates a perverse incentive."


Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Arizona ballot measures
The campaign finance information on this page reflects the most recent scheduled reports that Ballotpedia has processed, which covered through December 31, 2022.


Arizonans for Public Safety Yes on 310 was the campaign in support of the measure.[6]

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $475,569.65 $0.00 $475,569.65 $474,862.03 $474,862.03
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total $475,569.65 $0.00 $0.00 $474,862.03 $474,862.03

Support

The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committees in support of the measure.

Committees in support of Proposition 310
Committee Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Arizonans for Public Safety Yes on 310 $475,569.65 $0.00 $475,569.65 $474,862.03 $474,862.03
Total $475,569.65 $0.00 $475,569.65 $474,862.03 $474,862.03

Donors

The following were the top donors who contributed to the support committees.[6]

Donor Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions
PFFA PAC $77,498.00 $0.00 $77,498.00
International Association of Firefighters $50,000.00 $0.00 $50,000.00
Support Arizona Fire Districts $47,667.00 $0.00 $47,667.00
Arizona Fire Districts PAC $25,000.00 $0.00 $25,000.00
United Sun Cities Firefighters, FIRE-PAC $23,500.00 $0.00 $23,500.00

Opposition

Ballotpedia did not identify ballot measure committees registered to oppose the ballot measure.[6]

Methodology

To read Ballotpedia's methodology for covering ballot measure campaign finance information, click here.

Background

Fire districts in Arizona

As of April 5, 2022, there were 141 active fire districts in Arizona, according to the state Department of Forestry and Fire Management.[7] AZGeo Data Hub, the state's geospatial data website, provides a map of where fire districts are located. You can view the map here.

In Arizona, a county board of supervisors must levy a property tax within a fire district's boundaries. The tax amount is based on the district's annual budget, but the amount cannot exceed the lesser of:[2]

  • (a) $33.75 per $100,000 of assessed value in 2022 or $35.000 per $100,000 of assessed value in 2023 and thereafter or
  • (b) the previous years amount multiplied by 108%.

Voters within the district's boundaries can vote to enact a higher property tax for the district.

Referred statutes on the ballot in Arizona

From 1985 to 2020, the state legislature voted to refer 15 statutes to voters, who approved 11 and rejected four. The following table provides information on legislatively referred state statutes in Arizona from 1985 to 2020:

Referred statutes on the ballot in Arizona, 1985-2020
Total number Approved Percent approved Defeated Percent defeated Even-year average Even-year median Even-year minimum Even-year maximum
15 11 73.3% 4 26.7% 0.8 0.5 0 4

Path to the ballot

See also: Legislatively referred state statute

In Arizona, the state Legislature can refer a statute to the ballot. A simple majority vote was required in each legislative chamber.

The ballot measure was introduced into the Legislature as Senate Concurrent Resolution 1049 (SCR 1049) during the 2022 legislative session. Prior to SCR 1049, the group Support Arizona Fire Districts filed a ballot initiative that would have enacted similar legislation.

The House of Representatives voted 34-25 to pass an amended SCR 1049 on June 22. The Senate voted 25-3 to pass the resolution on June 23, 2022.[8] With approval in both the House and Senate, the proposal was referred to the ballot for the election on November 8, 2022.

Vote in the Arizona House of Representatives
June 22, 2022
Requirement: Simple majority vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 31  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total34251
Total percent56.66%41.66%1.66%
Democrat2801
Republican6250

Vote in the Arizona State Senate
June 23, 2022
Requirement: Simple majority vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 16  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total2532
Total percent83.33%10.00%6.67%
Democrat1202
Republican1330

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Arizona

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Arizona.

How to vote in Arizona


See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Arizona State Legislature, "Senate Concurrent Resolution 1049," accessed June 29, 2022
  2. 2.0 2.1 Arizona State Legislature, "Arizona Revised Statutes 48-805," accessed June 29, 2022
  3. Arizona State Legislature, "SCR 1049 Fact Sheet," June 22, 2022
  4. Arizona Fire District Association, "FAQ's," accessed June 29, 2022
  5. 5.0 5.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Arizona Secretary of State, "Campaign Finance," accessed Oct 17, 2022
  7. AZGeo Data Hub, "AZ Fire Service 2019," accessed June 29, 2022
  8. Arizona State Legislature, "SCR 1049 Overview," accessed June 29, 2022
  9. Arizona Revised Statutes, "Title 16, Section 565," accessed July 18, 2024
  10. Arizona generally observes Mountain Standard Time; however, the Navajo Nation observes daylight saving time. Because of this, Mountain Daylight Time is sometimes observed in Arizona.
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 Arizona Secretary of State, "Voters," accessed July 18, 2024
  12. Arizona Secretary of State, "Arizona Voter Registration Instructions," accessed July 18, 2024
  13. Supreme Court of the United States, "No. 24A164," accessed August 22, 2024
  14. The Washington Post, "Supreme Court allows Arizona voter-registration law requiring proof of citizenship," August 22, 2024
  15. Bloomberg Law, "Supreme Court Partly Restores Voter Proof-of-Citizenship Law ," August 22, 2024
  16. Reuters, "US Supreme Court partly revives Arizona's proof of citizenship voter law," August 22, 2024
  17. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  18. ArizonaElections.gov, "What ID Do I Need to Vote Quiz," accessed March 14, 2023
  19. Arizona State Legislature, “Arizona Revised Statutes 16-579,” accessed July 19, 2024