Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
Ava Natalia Bravo
Ava Natalia Bravo ran for election for the Department 2 judge of the Las Vegas Township Justice Court in Nevada. She lost in the primary on June 11, 2024.
Bravo completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2024. Click here to read the survey answers.
Biography
Ava Natalia Bravo was born in Montebello, California. She attended San Diego State University, earned a bachelor's degree from the California State University, Fullerton in 1988, and a law degree from the Western State University College of Law in 1992. Her career experience includes working as an attorney at law, victims advocate, and minors counsel. She has been affiliated with the Las Vegas Latino Bar Association and Nevada Attorneys for Criminal Justice.[1]
Elections
2024
See also: City elections in Las Vegas, Nevada (2024)
General election
General election for Las Vegas Township Justice Court Department 2
Kristal Bradford defeated incumbent Joseph Sciscento in the general election for Las Vegas Township Justice Court Department 2 on November 5, 2024.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Kristal Bradford (Nonpartisan) | 53.3 | 275,695 |
![]() | Joseph Sciscento (Nonpartisan) | 46.7 | 241,312 |
Total votes: 517,007 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Nonpartisan primary election
Nonpartisan primary for Las Vegas Township Justice Court Department 2
Incumbent Joseph Sciscento and Kristal Bradford defeated Ava Natalia Bravo in the primary for Las Vegas Township Justice Court Department 2 on June 11, 2024.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Joseph Sciscento (Nonpartisan) | 42.6 | 53,821 |
✔ | ![]() | Kristal Bradford (Nonpartisan) | 31.3 | 39,502 |
![]() | Ava Natalia Bravo (Nonpartisan) ![]() | 26.1 | 32,903 |
Total votes: 126,226 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Endorsements
Ballotpedia did not identify endorsements for Bravo in this election.
Campaign themes
2024
Ballotpedia survey responses
See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection
Ava Natalia Bravo completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2024. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Bravo's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.
Collapse all
|Furthermore, my work representing minors in the foster system has provided me with invaluable insights into the challenges facing some of the most vulnerable members of our society. I have seen firsthand the importance of ensuring that every individual receives fair and just treatment under the law.
In addition, my tenure as a probation officer, alongside my certification to carry a weapon and work alongside law enforcement officers, has given me a unique perspective on public safety.
Drawing on this diverse background, I am committed to bringing a balanced and nuanced approach to the bench. I believe that my experiences have prepared me well to serve as a neutral arbiter, dedicated to upholding the principles of fairness, justice, and equality for all. With your support, I am confident that together, we can work towards a legal system that truly serves the needs of our community.- Experience and Perspective: With my extensive background as a prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, advocate for minors in the foster system, and former probation officer, I bring a wealth of experience and perspective to the table. My multifaceted career has equipped me with a deep understanding of the intricacies of our legal system, allowing me to serve as a fair and impartial judge who considers all angles of a case.
- Commitment to Impartiality and Fairness: I am unwavering in my commitment to upholding the principles of neutrality, fairness, and justice. If elected, I pledge to be a neutral arbiter who carefully evaluates all evidence and arguments before making decisions. My goal is to ensure that every individual who enters the courtroom receives a fair and just hearing, regardless of their background or circumstances.
- Commitment to Honesty and Integrity: I hold honesty and integrity as paramount values in all aspects of my life, and my judicial candidacy is no exception. I am dedicated to serving with the utmost transparency, honesty, and integrity, ensuring that the trust placed in me by the community is never compromised. I will uphold the highest ethical standards, earning and maintaining the respect and confidence of all those I serve. I firmly believe that judicial decisions must never be influenced by personal relationships. I aim to serve with transparency, ensuring that the judiciary remains fair and unbiased for everyone in our community. I am committed to building a judiciary grounded in honesty, integrity, and trustworthiness.
Furthermore, elected officials must exemplify transparency, accountability, and professionalism in their conduct both on and off the bench, recognizing that respect for the office demands different behavior even in personal life. They should foster a respectful and inclusive courtroom environment and uphold high standards in all aspects. Ultimately, the primary responsibility is to serve as a neutral and impartial arbiter, committed to the rule of law and the fair administration of justice with unwavering integrity.
In this way, my legacy isn't about me but about the impact I've had on others through kindness, integrity, and respect. Ideally, I would like to be remembered as someone who was kind and strived to be the best they could, living a life that, while imperfect, embodies the characteristics everyone values.
My legal philosophy is centered on promoting justice, fairness, and the rule of law in every aspect of the judicial process. I strive to approach each case with an open mind, carefully considering all relevant facts, arguments, and legal principles before reaching a fair and impartial decision.
One notable example that I've learned from is the friendship between Justices Antonin Scalia and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Despite their differing judicial philosophies and often opposing viewpoints, they shared a deep respect for each other and maintained a close friendship. This unique bond serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of civility, collegiality, and intellectual exchange within the judiciary. By examining their relationship, I've gained valuable insights into the importance of maintaining mutual respect and open dialogue, even in the face of ideological differences.
Empathy allows judges to appreciate the circumstances and perspectives of the individuals involved in a case, however, it's important for judges to balance empathy with impartiality and adhere to legal principles and precedent. While empathy can inform judicial discretion, it should not override the rule of law or lead to biased or subjective judgments.
Throughout my career, I have dedicated myself to serving the community and promoting the rule of law. My diverse background as a prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, advocate for minors in the foster system, and former probation officer has equipped me with a comprehensive understanding of the complexities of our legal system and the needs of our community.
I am passionate about ensuring equal access to justice for all individuals, regardless of their background or circumstances. I believe that my experience and commitment to fairness and integrity make me well-suited to serve as a neutral arbiter on the bench, adjudicating cases with impartiality and upholding the rights and liberties of all individuals who come before the court.
Unprofessional behavior, such as incivility, disrespect towards litigants, attorneys, or court personnel, or failure to adhere to established courtroom procedures, can disrupt proceedings, delay justice, and create an atmosphere of hostility and distrust. Additionally, a lack of decorum can reflect poorly on the legal profession as a whole, tarnishing its reputation and diminishing its perceived authority and credibility.
Advancements in technology have the potential to revolutionize the legal profession, making legal services more accessible, affordable, and efficient for all individuals.
By embracing these innovations and leveraging technology to modernize our legal system, we can break down barriers to access to justice. Technology can enable individuals to navigate the legal process more easily, connect with legal resources and services, and access information and assistance remotely, regardless of their geographical location or socioeconomic status.
Additionally, judges' performances can vary across different cases and contexts, and a single rating may not fully capture their overall effectiveness or suitability for the bench. Therefore, while Bar Association ratings can be a useful tool for evaluating judges, they should be considered alongside other factors, such as judicial opinions, courtroom demeanor, and feedback from legal professionals and litigants.
Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.
See also
2024 Elections
External links
Candidate Las Vegas Township Justice Court Department 2 |
Personal |
Footnotes
- ↑ Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on May 17, 2024
Federal courts:
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals • U.S. District Court: District of Nevada • U.S. Bankruptcy Court: District of Nevada
State courts:
Nevada Supreme Court • Nevada Court of Appeals • Nevada District Courts • Nevada Justice Courts • Nevada Municipal Courts • Clark County Family Court, Nevada
State resources:
Courts in Nevada • Nevada judicial elections • Judicial selection in Nevada