Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.
Avalon, California, Measure SS, Sales Tax (March 2020)
Avalon Measure SS | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Election date March 3, 2020 | |
Topic Local sales tax | |
Status![]() | |
Type Referral | Origin Lawmakers |
A sales tax measure was on the ballot for Avalon voters in Los Angeles County, California, on March 3, 2020.[1] It was defeated.
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to levy an additional sales tax of 0.25% to fund general city services, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in the city from 10% to 10.25%. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to levy an additional sales tax of 0.25% to fund general city services, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in the city from 10% to 10.25%. |
City officials estimated that the tax would generate $240,000 per year in revenue.[1]
A simple majority vote was required for the approval of Measure SS.
Election results
Avalon Measure SS |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
Yes | 363 | 35.31% | ||
665 | 64.69% |
Text of measure
Ballot question
The ballot question was as follows:[1]
“ |
Shall a measure be adopted by the City of Avalon enacting a one-quarter percent (1/4%) transactions and use (sales) tax, generating approximately $240,000.00 annually for general City services until ended by voters?[2] |
” |
Impartial analysis
The following impartial analysis of the measure was prepared by the office of the Avalon City Attorney:[1]
|
Full text
The full text of the measure is available here.
Path to the ballot
This measure was put on the ballot through a vote of the Avalon City Council.[1]
See also
External links
Footnotes
![]() |
State of California Sacramento (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |