Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
BAENDER v. BARNETT, AS SHERIFF OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA (1921)

![]() |
BAENDER v. BARNETT, AS SHERIFF OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA |
---|
Term: 1920 |
Important Dates |
Argued: January 11, 1921 |
Decided: February 28, 1921 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Louis Dembitz Brandeis • John Hessin Clarke • William Rufus Day • Oliver Wendell Holmes • Joseph McKenna • James Clark McReynolds • Mahlon Pitney • Willis Van Devanter • Edward Douglass White |
BAENDER v. BARNETT, AS SHERIFF OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 28, 1921. The case was argued before the court on January 11, 1921.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the California Northern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1920s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the White Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Habeas corpus
- Petitioner: Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: County government or county governmental unit, except school district
- Respondent state: California
- Citation: 255 U.S. 224
- How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Edward Douglass White
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Willis Van Devanter
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes