Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

BAENDER v. BARNETT, AS SHERIFF OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA (1921)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
BAENDER v. BARNETT, AS SHERIFF OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Term: 1920
Important Dates
Argued: January 11, 1921
Decided: February 28, 1921
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
9-0
Majority
Louis Dembitz BrandeisJohn Hessin ClarkeWilliam Rufus DayOliver Wendell HolmesJoseph McKennaJames Clark McReynoldsMahlon PitneyWillis Van DevanterEdward Douglass White

BAENDER v. BARNETT, AS SHERIFF OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 28, 1921. The case was argued before the court on January 11, 1921.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the California Northern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1920s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the White Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Habeas corpus
  • Petitioner: Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: County government or county governmental unit, except school district
  • Respondent state: California
  • Citation: 255 U.S. 224
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Edward Douglass White
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Willis Van Devanter

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes