Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

BARTNICKI et al. v. VOPPER, AKA WILLIAMS, et al. (2001)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
BARTNICKI et al. v. VOPPER, AKA WILLIAMS, et al.
Term: 2000
Important Dates
Argued: December 5, 2000
Decided: May 21, 2001
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
6-3
Majority
Ruth Bader GinsburgAnthony KennedyDavid SouterJohn Paul Stevens
Concurring
Stephen BreyerSandra Day O'Connor
Dissenting
William RehnquistAntonin ScaliaClarence Thomas

BARTNICKI et al. v. VOPPER, AKA WILLIAMS, et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 21, 2001. The case was argued before the court on December 5, 2000.

In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Pennsylvania Middle U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: First Amendment - Libel, privacy: true and false light invasions of privacy
  • Petitioner: Governmental employee or job applicant
  • Petitioner state: Pennsylvania
  • Respondent type: Journalist, columnist, member of the news media
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 532 U.S. 514
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: John Paul Stevens

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes