BARTNICKI et al. v. VOPPER, AKA WILLIAMS, et al. (2001)

![]() |
BARTNICKI et al. v. VOPPER, AKA WILLIAMS, et al. |
---|
Term: 2000 |
Important Dates |
Argued: December 5, 2000 |
Decided: May 21, 2001 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
6-3 |
Majority |
Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • David Souter • John Paul Stevens |
Concurring |
Stephen Breyer • Sandra Day O'Connor |
Dissenting |
William Rehnquist • Antonin Scalia • Clarence Thomas |
BARTNICKI et al. v. VOPPER, AKA WILLIAMS, et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 21, 2001. The case was argued before the court on December 5, 2000.
In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Pennsylvania Middle U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: First Amendment - Libel, privacy: true and false light invasions of privacy
- Petitioner: Governmental employee or job applicant
- Petitioner state: Pennsylvania
- Respondent type: Journalist, columnist, member of the news media
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 532 U.S. 514
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: John Paul Stevens
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes