Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

BAYSIDE FISH FLOUR CO. v. GENTRY et al. (1936)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
BAYSIDE FISH FLOUR CO. v. GENTRY et al.
Term: 1935
Important Dates
Argued: February 12, 1936
Decided: March 2, 1936
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
9-0
Majority
Louis Dembitz BrandeisPierce ButlerBenjamin Nathan CardozoCharles Evans HughesJames Clark McReynoldsOwen Josephus RobertsHarlan Fiske StoneGeorge SutherlandWillis Van Devanter

BAYSIDE FISH FLOUR CO. v. GENTRY et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 2, 1936. The case was argued before the court on February 12, 1936.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the California Northern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1930s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Hughes Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Economic Activity - Natural resources - environmental protection (cf. national supremacy: natural resources, national supremacy: pollution)
  • Petitioner: Manufacturer
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Governmental employee or job applicant
  • Respondent state: California
  • Citation: 297 U.S. 422
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Charles Evans Hughes
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: George Sutherland

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes