Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey
BERTRAM RICE, WARDEN, et al. v. STEVEN MARTELL COLLINS (2006)

![]() |
BERTRAM RICE, WARDEN, et al. v. STEVEN MARTELL COLLINS |
---|
Term: 2005 |
Important Dates |
Argued: December 5, 2005 |
Decided: January 18, 2006 |
Outcome |
Reversed and remanded |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • Sandra Day O'Connor • John Roberts • Antonin Scalia • John Paul Stevens • Clarence Thomas |
Concurring |
Stephen Breyer • David Souter |
BERTRAM RICE, WARDEN, et al. v. STEVEN MARTELL COLLINS is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 18, 2006. The case was argued before the court on December 5, 2005.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the California Central U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Habeas corpus
- Petitioner: State
- Petitioner state: California
- Respondent type: Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 546 U.S. 333
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Anthony Kennedy
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes