Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
BIDDLE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (1938)

![]() |
BIDDLE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE |
---|
Term: 1937 |
Important Dates |
Argued: December 9, 1937 |
Decided: January 10, 1938 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
6-3 |
Majority |
Hugo Black • Louis Dembitz Brandeis • Benjamin Nathan Cardozo • Charles Evans Hughes • Owen Josephus Roberts • Harlan Fiske Stone |
Dissenting |
Pierce Butler • James Clark McReynolds • George Sutherland |
BIDDLE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 10, 1938. The case was argued before the court on December 9, 1937.
In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1930s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Hughes Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Federal Taxation - Federal taxation of gifts, personal, business, or professional expenses
- Petitioner: Taxpayer or executor of taxpayer's estate, federal only
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Internal Revenue Service, Collector, Commissioner, or District Director of
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 302 U.S. 573
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Charles Evans Hughes
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Harlan Fiske Stone
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes