Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

BILL JOHNSON'S RESTAURANTS, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD (1983)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
BILL JOHNSON'S RESTAURANTS, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Term: 1982
Important Dates
Argued: March 29, 1983
Decided: May 31, 1983
Outcome
Vacated and remanded
Vote
9-0
Majority
Harry BlackmunWarren BurgerThurgood MarshallSandra Day O'ConnorLewis PowellWilliam RehnquistJohn Paul StevensByron White
Concurring
William Brennan

BILL JOHNSON'S RESTAURANTS, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 31, 1983. The case was argued before the court on March 29, 1983.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Burger Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Federalism - federal pre-emption of state court jurisdiction
  • Petitioner: employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer.
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: National Labor Relations Board, or regional office or officer
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 461 U.S. 731
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Warren Burger
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Byron White

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes