Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

BLANCO v. HUBBARD, UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR PORTO RICO (1911)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
BLANCO v. HUBBARD, UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR PORTO RICO
Term: 1910
Important Dates
Argued: March 17, 1911
Decided: April 3, 1911
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
9-0
Majority
William Rufus DayJohn Marshall HarlanOliver Wendell HolmesCharles Evans HughesJoseph Rucker LamarHorace Harmon LurtonJoseph McKennaWillis Van DevanterEdward Douglass White

BLANCO v. HUBBARD, UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR PORTO RICO is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 3, 1911. The case was argued before the court on March 17, 1911.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Puerto Rico U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1910s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the White Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Due Process - due process: hearing or notice (other than as pertains to government employees or prisoners' rights)
  • Petitioner: Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Governmental official, or an official of an agency established under an interstate compact
  • Respondent state: United States
  • Citation: 220 U.S. 233
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Edward Douglass White
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Edward Douglass White

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes