Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

BOISE ARTESIAN HOT AND COLD WATER CO., LIMITED, v. BOISE CITY (1913)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
BOISE ARTESIAN HOT AND COLD WATER CO., LIMITED, v. BOISE CITY
Term: 1912
Important Dates
Argued: May 7, 1913
Decided: June 16, 1913
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
9-0
Majority
William Rufus DayOliver Wendell HolmesCharles Evans HughesJoseph Rucker LamarHorace Harmon LurtonJoseph McKennaMahlon PitneyWillis Van DevanterEdward Douglass White

BOISE ARTESIAN HOT AND COLD WATER CO., LIMITED, v. BOISE CITY is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 16, 1913. The case was argued before the court on May 7, 1913.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Idaho U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1910s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the White Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Economic Activity - state or local government tax
  • Petitioner: Public utility
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit
  • Respondent state: Idaho
  • Citation: 230 U.S. 84
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Edward Douglass White
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Horace Harmon Lurton

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes