BOOKER T. HUDSON, JR. v. MICHIGAN (2006)

![]() |
BOOKER T. HUDSON, JR. v. MICHIGAN |
---|
Term: 2005 |
Important Dates |
Argued: January 9, 2006 |
Decided: June 15, 2006 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
5-4 |
Majority |
Samuel Alito • John Roberts • Antonin Scalia • Clarence Thomas |
Concurring |
Anthony Kennedy |
Dissenting |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • David Souter • John Paul Stevens |
BOOKER T. HUDSON, JR. v. MICHIGAN is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 15, 2006. The case was argued before the court on January 9, 2006.
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Michigan State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - search and seizure (other than as pertains to vehicles or Crime Control Act)
- Petitioner: Person convicted of crime
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: State
- Respondent state: Michigan
- Citation: 547 U.S. 586
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Antonin Scalia
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes